Maciej Orzechowski, Anna Knafel, Tomasz Banas, Robert Jach, Kazimierz Pitynski, Marcin Wiechec
{"title":"妊娠11-13周(+6天)正常胎儿下面角(IFA)的超声评价。","authors":"Maciej Orzechowski, Anna Knafel, Tomasz Banas, Robert Jach, Kazimierz Pitynski, Marcin Wiechec","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Retrognathia is a common feature\nof many fetal anomalies that may be\ndiagnosed during ultrasound examination.\nThe most common method\nused for the diagnosis of this condition\nis the inferior facial angle (IFA). The\nexisting reference ranges for IFA have\nbeen established for the fetuses at 18-\n28 weeks gestation and may be not applicable\nin the first trimester. The aim\nof the study was to document changes\nof IFA from 11+0 to 13+6 weeks gestation,\nto verify the reproducibility of IFA\ncalculations obtained by the same examiner\nand to investigate the possible\nassociation between IFA values at the\nfirst and second trimester scans.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective\nstudy was performed in 512 singleton\npregnancies during the first\ntrimester ultrasound exam. IFA was\ncalculated by measuring the angle\nmade by the cross-section of a line\northogonal to the forehead at the level\nof nasofrontal suture and the line from\nthe tip of the mentum to the anterior\nborder of the more protrusive lip. In\n100 cases, stored images were used\nto calculate IFA twice by the same\nexaminer. In a second trimester scan,\nIFA was measured again in 215 fetuses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median IFA value at\nthe time of the first trimester (IFA-1)\nwas 880 (IQR: 8.0) and decreased with\ncrown-rump length (CRL) and biparietal\ndiameter (BPD). A moderate negative\ncorrelation was shown between\nIFA-1 and CRL (r= 0.3; p<0.001) as well\nas between IFA-1 and BPD-1 (r= 0.176;\np=0.010). An intraclass correlation\ncoefficient (ICC) of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81\n– 0.91) confirmed strong intraobserver\nagreement between two IFA measurements.\nIn 215 fetuses that underwent\na second trimester screening, the\nmedian IFA-2 was significantly lower\ncompared to IFA-1(215) (750; IQR: 10.0\nvs.870; IQR: 8.0; p<0.001), and there\nwas no correlation between IFA1215 and\nIFA-2 (r= -0.024; p=0.731).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the first trimester,\nIFA decreases with CRL and BPD.\nWhen performed by the same operator,\nmeasurement of IFA is reproducible. There is no correlation\nbetween the IFA values in the first and second trimesters.</p>","PeriodicalId":21148,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad lekarski","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound evaluation of inferior facial angle (IFA) in a population of normal fetuses at 11-13 weeks (+6 days) gestation.\",\"authors\":\"Maciej Orzechowski, Anna Knafel, Tomasz Banas, Robert Jach, Kazimierz Pitynski, Marcin Wiechec\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Retrognathia is a common feature\\nof many fetal anomalies that may be\\ndiagnosed during ultrasound examination.\\nThe most common method\\nused for the diagnosis of this condition\\nis the inferior facial angle (IFA). The\\nexisting reference ranges for IFA have\\nbeen established for the fetuses at 18-\\n28 weeks gestation and may be not applicable\\nin the first trimester. The aim\\nof the study was to document changes\\nof IFA from 11+0 to 13+6 weeks gestation,\\nto verify the reproducibility of IFA\\ncalculations obtained by the same examiner\\nand to investigate the possible\\nassociation between IFA values at the\\nfirst and second trimester scans.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective\\nstudy was performed in 512 singleton\\npregnancies during the first\\ntrimester ultrasound exam. IFA was\\ncalculated by measuring the angle\\nmade by the cross-section of a line\\northogonal to the forehead at the level\\nof nasofrontal suture and the line from\\nthe tip of the mentum to the anterior\\nborder of the more protrusive lip. In\\n100 cases, stored images were used\\nto calculate IFA twice by the same\\nexaminer. In a second trimester scan,\\nIFA was measured again in 215 fetuses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median IFA value at\\nthe time of the first trimester (IFA-1)\\nwas 880 (IQR: 8.0) and decreased with\\ncrown-rump length (CRL) and biparietal\\ndiameter (BPD). A moderate negative\\ncorrelation was shown between\\nIFA-1 and CRL (r= 0.3; p<0.001) as well\\nas between IFA-1 and BPD-1 (r= 0.176;\\np=0.010). An intraclass correlation\\ncoefficient (ICC) of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81\\n– 0.91) confirmed strong intraobserver\\nagreement between two IFA measurements.\\nIn 215 fetuses that underwent\\na second trimester screening, the\\nmedian IFA-2 was significantly lower\\ncompared to IFA-1(215) (750; IQR: 10.0\\nvs.870; IQR: 8.0; p<0.001), and there\\nwas no correlation between IFA1215 and\\nIFA-2 (r= -0.024; p=0.731).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the first trimester,\\nIFA decreases with CRL and BPD.\\nWhen performed by the same operator,\\nmeasurement of IFA is reproducible. There is no correlation\\nbetween the IFA values in the first and second trimesters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przeglad lekarski\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przeglad lekarski\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad lekarski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ultrasound evaluation of inferior facial angle (IFA) in a population of normal fetuses at 11-13 weeks (+6 days) gestation.
Retrognathia is a common feature
of many fetal anomalies that may be
diagnosed during ultrasound examination.
The most common method
used for the diagnosis of this condition
is the inferior facial angle (IFA). The
existing reference ranges for IFA have
been established for the fetuses at 18-
28 weeks gestation and may be not applicable
in the first trimester. The aim
of the study was to document changes
of IFA from 11+0 to 13+6 weeks gestation,
to verify the reproducibility of IFA
calculations obtained by the same examiner
and to investigate the possible
association between IFA values at the
first and second trimester scans.
Material and methods: A prospective
study was performed in 512 singleton
pregnancies during the first
trimester ultrasound exam. IFA was
calculated by measuring the angle
made by the cross-section of a line
orthogonal to the forehead at the level
of nasofrontal suture and the line from
the tip of the mentum to the anterior
border of the more protrusive lip. In
100 cases, stored images were used
to calculate IFA twice by the same
examiner. In a second trimester scan,
IFA was measured again in 215 fetuses.
Results: The median IFA value at
the time of the first trimester (IFA-1)
was 880 (IQR: 8.0) and decreased with
crown-rump length (CRL) and biparietal
diameter (BPD). A moderate negative
correlation was shown between
IFA-1 and CRL (r= 0.3; p<0.001) as well
as between IFA-1 and BPD-1 (r= 0.176;
p=0.010). An intraclass correlation
coefficient (ICC) of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81
– 0.91) confirmed strong intraobserver
agreement between two IFA measurements.
In 215 fetuses that underwent
a second trimester screening, the
median IFA-2 was significantly lower
compared to IFA-1(215) (750; IQR: 10.0
vs.870; IQR: 8.0; p<0.001), and there
was no correlation between IFA1215 and
IFA-2 (r= -0.024; p=0.731).
Conclusions: In the first trimester,
IFA decreases with CRL and BPD.
When performed by the same operator,
measurement of IFA is reproducible. There is no correlation
between the IFA values in the first and second trimesters.