持续血糖监测在英国被低估了吗?

Q2 Medicine
European Endocrinology Pub Date : 2017-08-01 Epub Date: 2017-08-22 DOI:10.17925/EE.2017.13.02.76
Christopher G Parkin, Melissa Holloway, Jeffrey Truesdell, Tomas C Walker
{"title":"持续血糖监测在英国被低估了吗?","authors":"Christopher G Parkin,&nbsp;Melissa Holloway,&nbsp;Jeffrey Truesdell,&nbsp;Tomas C Walker","doi":"10.17925/EE.2017.13.02.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Information about continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use in the UK is limited. We conducted an online survey of a representative sample of current CGM users in England, Scotland and Wales to address this deficit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 29-item online survey was conducted between 29 December 2016 and 25 January 2017. Persons with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and caregivers of T1D children/adolescents were recruited from mailing lists, using Nielsen and Harris Polling databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>315 patients and caregivers responded to the survey - 170 adult patients and 145 caregivers. Among respondents, 144 received full funding for CGM use, 72 received partial funding and 83 received no funding. Most reported improvements in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (67.0%), fewer hypoglycaemia episodes (70.2%), improved hypoglycaemia awareness (77.5%) and better diabetes management (92.4%). Self-funders reported significantly higher CGM use (76.1%) than those who were fully funded (58.9%) and/or partially funded (65.9%), p=0.0008. Fewer than 50% of all respondents reported receiving guidance in interpreting CGM data from their diabetes care team; 30.1% of self-funders reported receiving no CGM support from their diabetes team compared with fully funded (2.8%) and partially funded (1.4%) respondents, p<0.0001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with T1D and their caregivers are realising benefits from CGM use but are largely unsupported by the UK healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":38860,"journal":{"name":"European Endocrinology","volume":"13 2","pages":"76-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7a/44/euendo-13-76.PMC5813469.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Continuous Glucose Monitoring Underappreciated in the UK?\",\"authors\":\"Christopher G Parkin,&nbsp;Melissa Holloway,&nbsp;Jeffrey Truesdell,&nbsp;Tomas C Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.17925/EE.2017.13.02.76\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Information about continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use in the UK is limited. We conducted an online survey of a representative sample of current CGM users in England, Scotland and Wales to address this deficit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 29-item online survey was conducted between 29 December 2016 and 25 January 2017. Persons with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and caregivers of T1D children/adolescents were recruited from mailing lists, using Nielsen and Harris Polling databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>315 patients and caregivers responded to the survey - 170 adult patients and 145 caregivers. Among respondents, 144 received full funding for CGM use, 72 received partial funding and 83 received no funding. Most reported improvements in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (67.0%), fewer hypoglycaemia episodes (70.2%), improved hypoglycaemia awareness (77.5%) and better diabetes management (92.4%). Self-funders reported significantly higher CGM use (76.1%) than those who were fully funded (58.9%) and/or partially funded (65.9%), p=0.0008. Fewer than 50% of all respondents reported receiving guidance in interpreting CGM data from their diabetes care team; 30.1% of self-funders reported receiving no CGM support from their diabetes team compared with fully funded (2.8%) and partially funded (1.4%) respondents, p<0.0001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with T1D and their caregivers are realising benefits from CGM use but are largely unsupported by the UK healthcare system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"76-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7a/44/euendo-13-76.PMC5813469.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17925/EE.2017.13.02.76\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/EE.2017.13.02.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

简介:关于连续血糖监测(CGM)在英国使用的信息是有限的。我们对英格兰、苏格兰和威尔士的当前CGM用户的代表性样本进行了一项在线调查,以解决这一问题。方法:于2016年12月29日至2017年1月25日进行29项在线调查。使用尼尔森和哈里斯民意调查数据库,从邮件列表中招募1型糖尿病患者(T1D)和T1D儿童/青少年的照顾者。结果:315名患者和护理人员回应了调查- 170名成年患者和145名护理人员。在答复者中,144人获得了CGM使用的全额资助,72人获得了部分资助,83人没有获得资助。大多数报告糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)改善(67.0%),低血糖发作减少(70.2%),低血糖意识改善(77.5%)和糖尿病管理改善(92.4%)。自筹者报告的CGM使用率(76.1%)明显高于全额资助者(58.9%)和部分资助者(65.9%),p=0.0008。不到50%的应答者报告从他们的糖尿病护理小组获得了解释CGM数据的指导;与全额资助(2.8%)和部分资助(1.4%)的受访者相比,30.1%的自资者报告没有从他们的糖尿病团队获得CGM支持。结论:T1D患者及其护理人员正在从CGM使用中获益,但在很大程度上没有得到英国医疗保健系统的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Is Continuous Glucose Monitoring Underappreciated in the UK?

Is Continuous Glucose Monitoring Underappreciated in the UK?

Introduction: Information about continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use in the UK is limited. We conducted an online survey of a representative sample of current CGM users in England, Scotland and Wales to address this deficit.

Methods: The 29-item online survey was conducted between 29 December 2016 and 25 January 2017. Persons with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and caregivers of T1D children/adolescents were recruited from mailing lists, using Nielsen and Harris Polling databases.

Results: 315 patients and caregivers responded to the survey - 170 adult patients and 145 caregivers. Among respondents, 144 received full funding for CGM use, 72 received partial funding and 83 received no funding. Most reported improvements in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (67.0%), fewer hypoglycaemia episodes (70.2%), improved hypoglycaemia awareness (77.5%) and better diabetes management (92.4%). Self-funders reported significantly higher CGM use (76.1%) than those who were fully funded (58.9%) and/or partially funded (65.9%), p=0.0008. Fewer than 50% of all respondents reported receiving guidance in interpreting CGM data from their diabetes care team; 30.1% of self-funders reported receiving no CGM support from their diabetes team compared with fully funded (2.8%) and partially funded (1.4%) respondents, p<0.0001.

Conclusions: Patients with T1D and their caregivers are realising benefits from CGM use but are largely unsupported by the UK healthcare system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Endocrinology
European Endocrinology Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信