Ahmad E. Mostafa , Gert Richardt , Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣植入术后瓣旁主动脉瓣反流预测模型的临床应用","authors":"Ahmad E. Mostafa , Gert Richardt , Mohamed Abdel-Wahab","doi":"10.1016/j.ehj.2017.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A predictive model for Paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) integrating the left ventricular outflow tract-to-ascending aorta angle (LVOT-AO) and depth to the non-coronary cusp (NCC) after TAVI with CoreValve prosthesis (MCP) was retrospectively identified (2<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->∠LVOT-AO<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->[depth to NCC-10]2; cutoff<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->50). However, the validity and clinical utility of this model remain unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 100 patients (79.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7<!--> <!-->years, mean EuroScore 24.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->16.3%, 41 males) constituted a validation cohort for the predictive model. Both angle (LVOT-AO) and depth to NCC were considered during patient selection and device implantation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Significant AR occurred in 16% (group A) vs. 84% (group B). Angle ∠LVOT-AO and depth to NCC were larger in group A compared to group B (16.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.2 vs. 11.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.1, <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001, and 9.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.8<!--> <!-->mm vs. 6.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.7<!--> <!-->mm, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.004). The model showed a sensitivity of 68.7% and a specificity of 88.1% in prediction of PAR. Comparing the derivation cohort (initial experience, <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->50) and validation cohort (later experience, <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->100) it is showed that the ∠LVOT-AO, valve depth and PAR were significantly lower (12.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.9 and 6.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.2<!--> <!-->mm vs. 19.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.9 and 10.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.7<!--> <!-->mm, 40% vs. 16% respectively, all <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001) in the validation cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The predictive model for significant PAR after TAVI using MCP is valid with a reassuring specificity and an acceptable sensitivity. A strategy incorporating these anatomical and procedural variables improves PAR after TAVI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44962,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Heart Journal","volume":"69 4","pages":"Pages 253-259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehj.2017.06.004","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical utility of a predictive model for paravalvular aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a self-expandable prosthesis\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad E. Mostafa , Gert Richardt , Mohamed Abdel-Wahab\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ehj.2017.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A predictive model for Paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) integrating the left ventricular outflow tract-to-ascending aorta angle (LVOT-AO) and depth to the non-coronary cusp (NCC) after TAVI with CoreValve prosthesis (MCP) was retrospectively identified (2<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->∠LVOT-AO<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->[depth to NCC-10]2; cutoff<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->50). However, the validity and clinical utility of this model remain unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 100 patients (79.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7<!--> <!-->years, mean EuroScore 24.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->16.3%, 41 males) constituted a validation cohort for the predictive model. Both angle (LVOT-AO) and depth to NCC were considered during patient selection and device implantation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Significant AR occurred in 16% (group A) vs. 84% (group B). Angle ∠LVOT-AO and depth to NCC were larger in group A compared to group B (16.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.2 vs. 11.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.1, <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001, and 9.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.8<!--> <!-->mm vs. 6.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.7<!--> <!-->mm, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.004). The model showed a sensitivity of 68.7% and a specificity of 88.1% in prediction of PAR. Comparing the derivation cohort (initial experience, <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->50) and validation cohort (later experience, <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->100) it is showed that the ∠LVOT-AO, valve depth and PAR were significantly lower (12.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.9 and 6.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.2<!--> <!-->mm vs. 19.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.9 and 10.4<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.7<!--> <!-->mm, 40% vs. 16% respectively, all <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001) in the validation cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The predictive model for significant PAR after TAVI using MCP is valid with a reassuring specificity and an acceptable sensitivity. A strategy incorporating these anatomical and procedural variables improves PAR after TAVI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Heart Journal\",\"volume\":\"69 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 253-259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehj.2017.06.004\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110260817300716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110260817300716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical utility of a predictive model for paravalvular aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a self-expandable prosthesis
Background
A predictive model for Paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) integrating the left ventricular outflow tract-to-ascending aorta angle (LVOT-AO) and depth to the non-coronary cusp (NCC) after TAVI with CoreValve prosthesis (MCP) was retrospectively identified (2 × ∠LVOT-AO + [depth to NCC-10]2; cutoff = 50). However, the validity and clinical utility of this model remain unknown.
Methods
A total of 100 patients (79.6 ± 7 years, mean EuroScore 24.9 ± 16.3%, 41 males) constituted a validation cohort for the predictive model. Both angle (LVOT-AO) and depth to NCC were considered during patient selection and device implantation.
Results
Significant AR occurred in 16% (group A) vs. 84% (group B). Angle ∠LVOT-AO and depth to NCC were larger in group A compared to group B (16.4 ± 7.2 vs. 11.8 ± 4.1, p < 0.001, and 9.1 ± 4.8 mm vs. 6.6 ± 2.7 mm, p = 0.004). The model showed a sensitivity of 68.7% and a specificity of 88.1% in prediction of PAR. Comparing the derivation cohort (initial experience, n = 50) and validation cohort (later experience, n = 100) it is showed that the ∠LVOT-AO, valve depth and PAR were significantly lower (12.5 ± 4.9 and 6.9 ± 3.2 mm vs. 19.7 ± 7.9 and 10.4 ± 3.7 mm, 40% vs. 16% respectively, all p < 0.001) in the validation cohort.
Conclusion
The predictive model for significant PAR after TAVI using MCP is valid with a reassuring specificity and an acceptable sensitivity. A strategy incorporating these anatomical and procedural variables improves PAR after TAVI.
期刊介绍:
The Egyptian Heart Journal is the official journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology. It is an international journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies and translational investigations. The journal publishes research, review articles, case reports and commentary articles, as well as editorials interpreting and commenting on the research presented. In addition, it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational issues.