埃塞俄比亚迪尔达瓦镇社区对洪水灾害的应急准备:一项定性研究。

Luche Tadesse Ejeta
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚迪尔达瓦镇社区对洪水灾害的应急准备:一项定性研究。","authors":"Luche Tadesse Ejeta","doi":"10.1371/currents.dis.3843ad9fc823c8c853970148b350750c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency preparedness at all levels (individuals and communities) is the corner stone of effective response to the increasing trends of global disasters due to man-made and natural hazards. It is determined by different factors, including (among others) past direct and indirect exposures to hazards. This study was carried out in Dire Dawa town, Ethiopia, which in the past experienced frequent flooding events, yet dearth of information exists about preparedness in the area.  The aim of the study was to assess the levels of emergency preparedness for flood hazards at households and communities levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in a qualitative approach and was conducted in Dire Dawa town, which has been divided into nine administrative-units called Kebeles. Two focus group discussions were held in two of these units (Kebele-05 and 06), each focus group comprising twelve people (all above 18 years of age), and in total 24 people (13 females and 11 males) took part in the study. Open ended questions were used that could guide the discussions, and the discussions were audio-taped and transcribed. The results were translated from local language to English and qualitatively presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings of focus group discussions showed that the local government in collaboration with the federal government built the flood protection dams in areas where flood hazards have been thought to be repeatedly wreaking havoc, specifically after the flood disaster of the year 2006. In addition, in Kebele-05, where one Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) was operating on flood hazards prevention and mitigation program, some non-structural emergency preparedness measures were undertaken by the communities. These non-structural measures (the major ones) entailed: establishment of committees recruited from residents and training them to raise awareness among communities on emergency preparedness; some residents made changes to their own houses (retrofitted) and put sandbags around their houses to temporarily protect the flooding; establishment of communication channels between communities to alarm each other in the event of flood disaster; and reforestation of the already deforested mountainous areas surrounding the town. However, concerns were raised by study participants about strengths of the constructed flood protection dams. Furthermore, the non-structural emergency preparedness measures identified by this study were not comprehensive; for example, residents were not trained in first aid, first aid kits were not provided, there was no linkage being established between communities and health facilities so as to provide emergency medical care to victims in the event of flood disaster.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings of this study concur with some of the previous quantitative studies' results in that the past direct and indirect disaster experiences invoke preparedness intention and actual preparedness for flood hazards at individuals, communities and organizations levels. The only one quantitative and behavioral based study conducted thus far in Dire Dawa town reported the strong association of past flood disaster experience with household emergency preparedness. Among the residents there was a tendency to rely on the dams to be constructed with \"good quality\" and \"higher strength\" than making preparedness efforts on their own at their households. Structural measures such as building of dams, dikes, levees, and channel improvements could be means of mitigation measures; however, solely relying on these measures could have far reaching consequences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To mitigate flood hazards, dams were built and in addition, in Kebele-05 where an NGO was operating, some non-structural emergency preparedness measures were undertaken. In the course of construction of flood protection dams, ensuring communities<b>'</b> involvement is needed<b>;</b> and at the same time undertaking comprehensive non-structural emergency preparedness measures in all Kebeles is highly recommended.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Emergency, Preparedness, Flood, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":74464,"journal":{"name":"PLoS currents","volume":"10 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5843487/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community's Emergency Preparedness for Flood Hazards in Dire-dawa Town, Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Luche Tadesse Ejeta\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/currents.dis.3843ad9fc823c8c853970148b350750c\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency preparedness at all levels (individuals and communities) is the corner stone of effective response to the increasing trends of global disasters due to man-made and natural hazards. It is determined by different factors, including (among others) past direct and indirect exposures to hazards. This study was carried out in Dire Dawa town, Ethiopia, which in the past experienced frequent flooding events, yet dearth of information exists about preparedness in the area.  The aim of the study was to assess the levels of emergency preparedness for flood hazards at households and communities levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in a qualitative approach and was conducted in Dire Dawa town, which has been divided into nine administrative-units called Kebeles. Two focus group discussions were held in two of these units (Kebele-05 and 06), each focus group comprising twelve people (all above 18 years of age), and in total 24 people (13 females and 11 males) took part in the study. Open ended questions were used that could guide the discussions, and the discussions were audio-taped and transcribed. The results were translated from local language to English and qualitatively presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings of focus group discussions showed that the local government in collaboration with the federal government built the flood protection dams in areas where flood hazards have been thought to be repeatedly wreaking havoc, specifically after the flood disaster of the year 2006. In addition, in Kebele-05, where one Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) was operating on flood hazards prevention and mitigation program, some non-structural emergency preparedness measures were undertaken by the communities. These non-structural measures (the major ones) entailed: establishment of committees recruited from residents and training them to raise awareness among communities on emergency preparedness; some residents made changes to their own houses (retrofitted) and put sandbags around their houses to temporarily protect the flooding; establishment of communication channels between communities to alarm each other in the event of flood disaster; and reforestation of the already deforested mountainous areas surrounding the town. However, concerns were raised by study participants about strengths of the constructed flood protection dams. Furthermore, the non-structural emergency preparedness measures identified by this study were not comprehensive; for example, residents were not trained in first aid, first aid kits were not provided, there was no linkage being established between communities and health facilities so as to provide emergency medical care to victims in the event of flood disaster.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings of this study concur with some of the previous quantitative studies' results in that the past direct and indirect disaster experiences invoke preparedness intention and actual preparedness for flood hazards at individuals, communities and organizations levels. The only one quantitative and behavioral based study conducted thus far in Dire Dawa town reported the strong association of past flood disaster experience with household emergency preparedness. Among the residents there was a tendency to rely on the dams to be constructed with \\\"good quality\\\" and \\\"higher strength\\\" than making preparedness efforts on their own at their households. Structural measures such as building of dams, dikes, levees, and channel improvements could be means of mitigation measures; however, solely relying on these measures could have far reaching consequences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To mitigate flood hazards, dams were built and in addition, in Kebele-05 where an NGO was operating, some non-structural emergency preparedness measures were undertaken. In the course of construction of flood protection dams, ensuring communities<b>'</b> involvement is needed<b>;</b> and at the same time undertaking comprehensive non-structural emergency preparedness measures in all Kebeles is highly recommended.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Emergency, Preparedness, Flood, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS currents\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5843487/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS currents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.3843ad9fc823c8c853970148b350750c\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS currents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.3843ad9fc823c8c853970148b350750c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:各级(个人和社区)的应急准备是有效应对人为和自然灾害造成的全球灾害日益增加的趋势的基石。它是由不同的因素决定的,包括(除其他外)过去直接和间接暴露于危险。这项研究是在埃塞俄比亚的Dire Dawa镇进行的,该镇过去经常发生洪水事件,但缺乏有关该地区备灾的信息。这项研究的目的是评估家庭和社区一级对洪水灾害的应急准备水平。方法:本研究采用定性方法,在被划分为9个行政单位的迪勒达瓦镇进行。在其中两个单元(Kebele-05和06)举行了两次焦点小组讨论,每个焦点小组由12人组成(年龄均在18岁以上),共有24人(13名女性和11名男性)参加了研究。使用开放式问题来指导讨论,并对讨论进行录音和转录。结果从当地语言翻译成英语并定性呈现。结果:焦点小组讨论的结果表明,地方政府与联邦政府合作,在洪水灾害被认为是反复造成破坏的地区建造了防洪大坝,特别是在2006年的洪水灾害之后。此外,在Kebele-05,一个非政府组织正在执行防洪和减灾方案,社区采取了一些非结构性应急准备措施。这些非结构性措施(主要措施)包括:建立从居民中招募的委员会,并对他们进行培训,以提高社区对应急准备的认识;一些居民对自己的房屋进行了改造(改造),并在房屋周围放置了沙袋,以暂时保护洪水;建立社区之间的沟通渠道,在发生洪水灾害时相互报警;在城镇周围已经被砍伐的山区重新造林。然而,研究参与者对已建成的防洪大坝的强度提出了担忧。此外,本研究确定的非结构性应急准备措施并不全面;例如,居民没有接受急救培训,没有提供急救包,社区和保健设施之间没有建立联系,以便在发生洪水灾害时向受害者提供紧急医疗服务。讨论:本研究的结果与之前一些定量研究的结果一致,即过去的直接和间接灾害经历在个人、社区和组织层面唤起了对洪水灾害的准备意图和实际准备。迄今为止在迪勒达瓦镇进行的唯一一项基于数量和行为的研究报告称,过去的洪水灾害经验与家庭应急准备密切相关。居民倾向于依赖“质量好”和“强度高”的水坝,而不是自己在家里做准备工作。结构措施,如建造水坝、堤防、防洪堤和改善航道,可作为缓解措施的手段;然而,仅仅依靠这些措施可能会产生深远的后果。结论:为了减轻洪水危害,修建了水坝,此外,在一家非政府组织开展业务的Kebele-05,采取了一些非结构性应急准备措施。在防洪大坝的建设过程中,需要确保社区的参与;同时,强烈建议在所有Kebeles进行全面的非结构性应急准备措施。关键词:应急,准备,洪水,德勒达瓦,埃塞俄比亚
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community's Emergency Preparedness for Flood Hazards in Dire-dawa Town, Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study.

Background: Emergency preparedness at all levels (individuals and communities) is the corner stone of effective response to the increasing trends of global disasters due to man-made and natural hazards. It is determined by different factors, including (among others) past direct and indirect exposures to hazards. This study was carried out in Dire Dawa town, Ethiopia, which in the past experienced frequent flooding events, yet dearth of information exists about preparedness in the area.  The aim of the study was to assess the levels of emergency preparedness for flood hazards at households and communities levels.

Methods: The study was conducted in a qualitative approach and was conducted in Dire Dawa town, which has been divided into nine administrative-units called Kebeles. Two focus group discussions were held in two of these units (Kebele-05 and 06), each focus group comprising twelve people (all above 18 years of age), and in total 24 people (13 females and 11 males) took part in the study. Open ended questions were used that could guide the discussions, and the discussions were audio-taped and transcribed. The results were translated from local language to English and qualitatively presented.

Results: The findings of focus group discussions showed that the local government in collaboration with the federal government built the flood protection dams in areas where flood hazards have been thought to be repeatedly wreaking havoc, specifically after the flood disaster of the year 2006. In addition, in Kebele-05, where one Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) was operating on flood hazards prevention and mitigation program, some non-structural emergency preparedness measures were undertaken by the communities. These non-structural measures (the major ones) entailed: establishment of committees recruited from residents and training them to raise awareness among communities on emergency preparedness; some residents made changes to their own houses (retrofitted) and put sandbags around their houses to temporarily protect the flooding; establishment of communication channels between communities to alarm each other in the event of flood disaster; and reforestation of the already deforested mountainous areas surrounding the town. However, concerns were raised by study participants about strengths of the constructed flood protection dams. Furthermore, the non-structural emergency preparedness measures identified by this study were not comprehensive; for example, residents were not trained in first aid, first aid kits were not provided, there was no linkage being established between communities and health facilities so as to provide emergency medical care to victims in the event of flood disaster.

Discussion: The findings of this study concur with some of the previous quantitative studies' results in that the past direct and indirect disaster experiences invoke preparedness intention and actual preparedness for flood hazards at individuals, communities and organizations levels. The only one quantitative and behavioral based study conducted thus far in Dire Dawa town reported the strong association of past flood disaster experience with household emergency preparedness. Among the residents there was a tendency to rely on the dams to be constructed with "good quality" and "higher strength" than making preparedness efforts on their own at their households. Structural measures such as building of dams, dikes, levees, and channel improvements could be means of mitigation measures; however, solely relying on these measures could have far reaching consequences.

Conclusions: To mitigate flood hazards, dams were built and in addition, in Kebele-05 where an NGO was operating, some non-structural emergency preparedness measures were undertaken. In the course of construction of flood protection dams, ensuring communities' involvement is needed; and at the same time undertaking comprehensive non-structural emergency preparedness measures in all Kebeles is highly recommended.

Key words: Emergency, Preparedness, Flood, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信