老年人生活在养老院中虚弱、多药和处方不足的关系。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2018-07-01 Epub Date: 2018-03-27 DOI:10.1007/s00228-018-2452-2
Marta Gutiérrez-Valencia, Mikel Izquierdo, Esther Lacalle-Fabo, Itxaso Marín-Epelde, María Fernanda Ramón-Espinoza, Thamara Domene-Domene, Álvaro Casas-Herrero, Arkaitz Galbete, Nicolás Martínez-Velilla
{"title":"老年人生活在养老院中虚弱、多药和处方不足的关系。","authors":"Marta Gutiérrez-Valencia,&nbsp;Mikel Izquierdo,&nbsp;Esther Lacalle-Fabo,&nbsp;Itxaso Marín-Epelde,&nbsp;María Fernanda Ramón-Espinoza,&nbsp;Thamara Domene-Domene,&nbsp;Álvaro Casas-Herrero,&nbsp;Arkaitz Galbete,&nbsp;Nicolás Martínez-Velilla","doi":"10.1007/s00228-018-2452-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Frailty, polypharmacy, and underprescription are considered a major matter of concern in nursing homes, but the possible relationships between them are not well known. The aim is to examine the possible association between medication underprescription, polypharmacy, and frailty in older people living in nursing homes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis from a concurrent cohort study, including 110 subjects ≥ 65 years living in two nursing homes. Four frailty scales were applied; polypharmacy was defined as ≥ 5 medications and underprescription was measured with Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (START) criteria. Logistic regression models were performed to assess the associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 86.3 years (SD 7.3) and 71.8% were female. 73.6% of subjects took ≥ 5 chronic medications and 60.9% met one or more START criteria. The non-frail participants took more medications than the frail subjects according to the imputated frailty Fried criteria (8.1 vs 6.7, p = 0.042) and the FRAIL-NH scale (7.8 vs 6.8, p = 0.026). Multivariate analyses did not find an association between frailty and polypharmacy. Frail participants according to the Fried criteria met a higher number of START criteria (1.9 vs 1.0, p = 0.017), and had a higher prevalence of underprescription (87.5 vs 50.0%), reaching the limit of statistical significance in multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The positive association found in previous studies between frailty and polypharmacy cannot be extrapolated to institutionalized populations. There is a trend towards higher rates of underprescription in frail subjects. Underprescription in frail older adults should be redefined and new strategies to measure it should be developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11857,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"74 7","pages":"961-970"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00228-018-2452-2","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between frailty, polypharmacy, and underprescription in older adults living in nursing homes.\",\"authors\":\"Marta Gutiérrez-Valencia,&nbsp;Mikel Izquierdo,&nbsp;Esther Lacalle-Fabo,&nbsp;Itxaso Marín-Epelde,&nbsp;María Fernanda Ramón-Espinoza,&nbsp;Thamara Domene-Domene,&nbsp;Álvaro Casas-Herrero,&nbsp;Arkaitz Galbete,&nbsp;Nicolás Martínez-Velilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00228-018-2452-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Frailty, polypharmacy, and underprescription are considered a major matter of concern in nursing homes, but the possible relationships between them are not well known. The aim is to examine the possible association between medication underprescription, polypharmacy, and frailty in older people living in nursing homes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis from a concurrent cohort study, including 110 subjects ≥ 65 years living in two nursing homes. Four frailty scales were applied; polypharmacy was defined as ≥ 5 medications and underprescription was measured with Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (START) criteria. Logistic regression models were performed to assess the associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 86.3 years (SD 7.3) and 71.8% were female. 73.6% of subjects took ≥ 5 chronic medications and 60.9% met one or more START criteria. The non-frail participants took more medications than the frail subjects according to the imputated frailty Fried criteria (8.1 vs 6.7, p = 0.042) and the FRAIL-NH scale (7.8 vs 6.8, p = 0.026). Multivariate analyses did not find an association between frailty and polypharmacy. Frail participants according to the Fried criteria met a higher number of START criteria (1.9 vs 1.0, p = 0.017), and had a higher prevalence of underprescription (87.5 vs 50.0%), reaching the limit of statistical significance in multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The positive association found in previous studies between frailty and polypharmacy cannot be extrapolated to institutionalized populations. There is a trend towards higher rates of underprescription in frail subjects. Underprescription in frail older adults should be redefined and new strategies to measure it should be developed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"74 7\",\"pages\":\"961-970\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00228-018-2452-2\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-018-2452-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-018-2452-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

目的:虚弱、多药和处方不足被认为是养老院关注的主要问题,但它们之间可能的关系尚不清楚。目的是研究在养老院生活的老年人中,药物处方不足、多种用药和虚弱之间可能存在的联系。方法:对一项同期队列研究进行横断面分析,包括110名≥65岁、住在两家养老院的受试者。采用四种虚弱量表;多药定义为≥5种药物,使用筛查工具提醒正确治疗(START)标准测量处方不足。采用Logistic回归模型评估相关性。结果:平均年龄86.3岁(SD 7.3),女性占71.8%。73.6%的受试者服用≥5种慢性药物,60.9%的受试者符合一项或多项START标准。根据设定的虚弱Fried标准(8.1 vs 6.7, p = 0.042)和frail - nh量表(7.8 vs 6.8, p = 0.026),非虚弱的参与者比虚弱的受试者服用更多的药物。多变量分析没有发现虚弱和多药之间的关联。根据Fried标准,体弱多病的参与者符合更高数量的START标准(1.9 vs 1.0, p = 0.017),并且处方不足的患病率更高(87.5 vs 50.0%),在多变量分析中达到了统计学意义的极限。结论:先前研究中发现的虚弱与多种药物之间的正相关不能外推到制度化人群中。在身体虚弱的受试者中,处方不足的比率有较高的趋势。应重新定义体弱多病的老年人的处方不足,并制定新的策略来衡量它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationship between frailty, polypharmacy, and underprescription in older adults living in nursing homes.

Purpose: Frailty, polypharmacy, and underprescription are considered a major matter of concern in nursing homes, but the possible relationships between them are not well known. The aim is to examine the possible association between medication underprescription, polypharmacy, and frailty in older people living in nursing homes.

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis from a concurrent cohort study, including 110 subjects ≥ 65 years living in two nursing homes. Four frailty scales were applied; polypharmacy was defined as ≥ 5 medications and underprescription was measured with Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (START) criteria. Logistic regression models were performed to assess the associations.

Results: The mean age was 86.3 years (SD 7.3) and 71.8% were female. 73.6% of subjects took ≥ 5 chronic medications and 60.9% met one or more START criteria. The non-frail participants took more medications than the frail subjects according to the imputated frailty Fried criteria (8.1 vs 6.7, p = 0.042) and the FRAIL-NH scale (7.8 vs 6.8, p = 0.026). Multivariate analyses did not find an association between frailty and polypharmacy. Frail participants according to the Fried criteria met a higher number of START criteria (1.9 vs 1.0, p = 0.017), and had a higher prevalence of underprescription (87.5 vs 50.0%), reaching the limit of statistical significance in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: The positive association found in previous studies between frailty and polypharmacy cannot be extrapolated to institutionalized populations. There is a trend towards higher rates of underprescription in frail subjects. Underprescription in frail older adults should be redefined and new strategies to measure it should be developed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology publishes original papers on all aspects of clinical pharmacology and drug therapy in humans. Manuscripts are welcomed on the following topics: therapeutic trials, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics, drug metabolism, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, all aspects of drug development, development relating to teaching in clinical pharmacology, pharmacoepidemiology, and matters relating to the rational prescribing and safe use of drugs. Methodological contributions relevant to these topics are also welcomed. Data from animal experiments are accepted only in the context of original data in man reported in the same paper. EJCP will only consider manuscripts describing the frequency of allelic variants in different populations if this information is linked to functional data or new interesting variants. Highly relevant differences in frequency with a major impact in drug therapy for the respective population may be submitted as a letter to the editor. Straightforward phase I pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic studies as parts of new drug development will only be considered for publication if the paper involves -a compound that is interesting and new in some basic or fundamental way, or -methods that are original in some basic sense, or -a highly unexpected outcome, or -conclusions that are scientifically novel in some basic or fundamental sense.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信