缓解疼痛的最佳激光光疗参数。

Q2 Medicine
Photomedicine and laser surgery Pub Date : 2018-07-01 Epub Date: 2018-03-27 DOI:10.1089/pho.2017.4399
Rohit J Kate, Sarah Rubatt, Chukuka S Enwemeka, Wendy E Huddleston
{"title":"缓解疼痛的最佳激光光疗参数。","authors":"Rohit J Kate,&nbsp;Sarah Rubatt,&nbsp;Chukuka S Enwemeka,&nbsp;Wendy E Huddleston","doi":"10.1089/pho.2017.4399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Studies on laser phototherapy for pain relief have used parameters that vary widely and have reported varying outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal parameter ranges of laser phototherapy for pain relief by analyzing data aggregated from existing primary literature.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Original studies were gathered from available sources and were screened to meet the pre-established inclusion criteria. The included articles were then subjected to meta-analysis using Cohen's d statistic for determining treatment effect size. From these studies, ranges of the reported parameters that always resulted into large effect sizes were determined. These optimal ranges were evaluated for their accuracy using leave-one-article-out cross-validation procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 96 articles met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis and yielded 232 effect sizes. The average effect size was highly significant: d = +1.36 [confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.04-1.68]. Among all the parameters, total energy was found to have the greatest effect on pain relief and had the most prominent optimal ranges of 120-162 and 15.36-20.16 J, which always resulted in large effect sizes. The cross-validation accuracy of the optimal ranges for total energy was 68.57% (95% CI = 53.19-83.97). Fewer and less-prominent optimal ranges were obtained for the energy density and duration parameters. None of the remaining parameters was found to be independently related to pain relief outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of meta-analysis indicate that laser phototherapy is highly effective for pain relief. Based on the analysis of parameters, total energy can be optimized to yield the largest effect on pain relief.</p>","PeriodicalId":20117,"journal":{"name":"Photomedicine and laser surgery","volume":"36 7","pages":"354-362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/pho.2017.4399","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Laser Phototherapy Parameters for Pain Relief.\",\"authors\":\"Rohit J Kate,&nbsp;Sarah Rubatt,&nbsp;Chukuka S Enwemeka,&nbsp;Wendy E Huddleston\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/pho.2017.4399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Studies on laser phototherapy for pain relief have used parameters that vary widely and have reported varying outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal parameter ranges of laser phototherapy for pain relief by analyzing data aggregated from existing primary literature.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Original studies were gathered from available sources and were screened to meet the pre-established inclusion criteria. The included articles were then subjected to meta-analysis using Cohen's d statistic for determining treatment effect size. From these studies, ranges of the reported parameters that always resulted into large effect sizes were determined. These optimal ranges were evaluated for their accuracy using leave-one-article-out cross-validation procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 96 articles met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis and yielded 232 effect sizes. The average effect size was highly significant: d = +1.36 [confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.04-1.68]. Among all the parameters, total energy was found to have the greatest effect on pain relief and had the most prominent optimal ranges of 120-162 and 15.36-20.16 J, which always resulted in large effect sizes. The cross-validation accuracy of the optimal ranges for total energy was 68.57% (95% CI = 53.19-83.97). Fewer and less-prominent optimal ranges were obtained for the energy density and duration parameters. None of the remaining parameters was found to be independently related to pain relief outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of meta-analysis indicate that laser phototherapy is highly effective for pain relief. Based on the analysis of parameters, total energy can be optimized to yield the largest effect on pain relief.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photomedicine and laser surgery\",\"volume\":\"36 7\",\"pages\":\"354-362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/pho.2017.4399\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photomedicine and laser surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2017.4399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photomedicine and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2017.4399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

背景和目的:激光光疗缓解疼痛的研究使用了不同的参数,并报道了不同的结果。本研究的目的是通过分析现有主要文献的数据,确定激光光疗缓解疼痛的最佳参数范围。材料和方法:从现有来源收集原始研究,并进行筛选以符合预先确定的纳入标准。然后使用Cohen's d统计量对纳入的文章进行meta分析,以确定治疗效果大小。从这些研究中,确定了总是导致大效应量的报告参数的范围。使用留一篇文章交叉验证程序评估这些最佳范围的准确性。结果:共有96篇文章符合meta分析的纳入标准,产生232个效应量。平均效应量非常显著:d = +1.36[置信区间(95% CI) = 1.04-1.68]。在所有参数中,总能量对疼痛的缓解效果最大,其最优范围为120 ~ 162 J和15.36 ~ 20.16 J,且总是产生较大的效应量。总能量最佳范围的交叉验证准确率为68.57% (95% CI = 53.19 ~ 83.97)。能量密度和持续时间参数的最优范围较少且不突出。其余参数均未发现与疼痛缓解结果独立相关。结论:荟萃分析结果表明,激光光疗对缓解疼痛非常有效。在参数分析的基础上,可以优化总能量,以产生最大的疼痛缓解效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal Laser Phototherapy Parameters for Pain Relief.

Background and objective: Studies on laser phototherapy for pain relief have used parameters that vary widely and have reported varying outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal parameter ranges of laser phototherapy for pain relief by analyzing data aggregated from existing primary literature.

Materials and methods: Original studies were gathered from available sources and were screened to meet the pre-established inclusion criteria. The included articles were then subjected to meta-analysis using Cohen's d statistic for determining treatment effect size. From these studies, ranges of the reported parameters that always resulted into large effect sizes were determined. These optimal ranges were evaluated for their accuracy using leave-one-article-out cross-validation procedure.

Results: A total of 96 articles met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis and yielded 232 effect sizes. The average effect size was highly significant: d = +1.36 [confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.04-1.68]. Among all the parameters, total energy was found to have the greatest effect on pain relief and had the most prominent optimal ranges of 120-162 and 15.36-20.16 J, which always resulted in large effect sizes. The cross-validation accuracy of the optimal ranges for total energy was 68.57% (95% CI = 53.19-83.97). Fewer and less-prominent optimal ranges were obtained for the energy density and duration parameters. None of the remaining parameters was found to be independently related to pain relief outcomes.

Conclusions: The findings of meta-analysis indicate that laser phototherapy is highly effective for pain relief. Based on the analysis of parameters, total energy can be optimized to yield the largest effect on pain relief.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery (formerly Photomedicine and Laser Surgery) is the essential journal for cutting-edge advances and research in phototherapy, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), and laser medicine and surgery. The Journal delivers basic and clinical findings and procedures to improve the knowledge and application of these techniques in medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信