SD BIOLINE幽门螺杆菌抗原快速检测与SD幽门螺杆菌抗原ELISA和EZ-STEP幽门螺杆菌抗原ELISA双酶联免疫吸附试验的比较

Q2 Medicine
BMC Clinical Pathology Pub Date : 2018-03-05 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s12907-018-0071-6
Markos Negash, Afework Kassu, Bemnet Amare, Gizachew Yismaw, Beyene Moges
{"title":"SD BIOLINE幽门螺杆菌抗原快速检测与SD幽门螺杆菌抗原ELISA和EZ-STEP幽门螺杆菌抗原ELISA双酶联免疫吸附试验的比较","authors":"Markos Negash,&nbsp;Afework Kassu,&nbsp;Bemnet Amare,&nbsp;Gizachew Yismaw,&nbsp;Beyene Moges","doi":"10.1186/s12907-018-0071-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Helicobacter pylori</i> antibody titters fall very slowly even after successful treatment. Therefore, tests detecting <i>H. pylori</i> antibody lack specificity and sensitivity. On the other hand, <i>H. pylori</i> stool antigen tests are reported as an alternative assay because of their reliability and simplicity. However, the comparative performance of <i>H. pylori</i> stool antigen tests for detecting the presence of the bacterium in clinical specimens in the study area is not assessed. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the performance of SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag rapid test with reference to the commercially available EZ- STEP ELISA and SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag ELISA tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Stool samples were collected to analyse the diagnostic performance of SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag rapid test kit using SD <i>H. pylori</i> Ag ELISA kit and EZ- STEP ELISA tests as a gold standard. Serum samples were also collected from each patient to test for the presence of <i>H. pylori</i> antibodies using dBest <i>H. pylori</i> Test Disk. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and kappa value are assessed. <i>P</i> values < 0.05 were taken statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stool and serum samples were collected from 201 dyspeptic patients and analysed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag rapid test were: 95.6% (95% CI, 88.8-98.8), 92.5% (95%CI, 89-94.1%), 86.7% (95% CI, 80.5-89.6), and 97.6% (95% CI, 993.9-99.3) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The performance of SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag rapid test was better than the currently available antibody test in study area. Therefore, the SD BIOLINE Ag rapid stool test could replace and be used to diagnose active <i>H. pylori</i> infection before the commencement of therapy among dyspeptic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":35804,"journal":{"name":"BMC Clinical Pathology","volume":"18 ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12907-018-0071-6","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag rapid test against double ELISA with SD <i>H. pylori</i> Ag ELISA and EZ-STEP <i>H. pylori</i> Ag ELISA tests.\",\"authors\":\"Markos Negash,&nbsp;Afework Kassu,&nbsp;Bemnet Amare,&nbsp;Gizachew Yismaw,&nbsp;Beyene Moges\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12907-018-0071-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Helicobacter pylori</i> antibody titters fall very slowly even after successful treatment. Therefore, tests detecting <i>H. pylori</i> antibody lack specificity and sensitivity. On the other hand, <i>H. pylori</i> stool antigen tests are reported as an alternative assay because of their reliability and simplicity. However, the comparative performance of <i>H. pylori</i> stool antigen tests for detecting the presence of the bacterium in clinical specimens in the study area is not assessed. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the performance of SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag rapid test with reference to the commercially available EZ- STEP ELISA and SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag ELISA tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Stool samples were collected to analyse the diagnostic performance of SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag rapid test kit using SD <i>H. pylori</i> Ag ELISA kit and EZ- STEP ELISA tests as a gold standard. Serum samples were also collected from each patient to test for the presence of <i>H. pylori</i> antibodies using dBest <i>H. pylori</i> Test Disk. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and kappa value are assessed. <i>P</i> values < 0.05 were taken statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stool and serum samples were collected from 201 dyspeptic patients and analysed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag rapid test were: 95.6% (95% CI, 88.8-98.8), 92.5% (95%CI, 89-94.1%), 86.7% (95% CI, 80.5-89.6), and 97.6% (95% CI, 993.9-99.3) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The performance of SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag rapid test was better than the currently available antibody test in study area. Therefore, the SD BIOLINE Ag rapid stool test could replace and be used to diagnose active <i>H. pylori</i> infection before the commencement of therapy among dyspeptic patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Clinical Pathology\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12907-018-0071-6\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Clinical Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12907-018-0071-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12907-018-0071-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

背景:即使治疗成功,幽门螺杆菌抗体滴度也会缓慢下降。因此,检测幽门螺杆菌抗体的方法缺乏特异性和敏感性。另一方面,幽门螺杆菌粪便抗原检测由于其可靠性和简单性被报道为一种替代检测方法。然而,在研究地区的临床标本中,幽门螺杆菌粪便抗原检测检测细菌存在的比较性能没有得到评估。因此,在本研究中,我们参考市售的EZ- STEP ELISA和SD BIOLINE幽门螺杆菌抗原ELISA检测来评估SD BIOLINE幽门螺杆菌抗原快速检测的性能。方法:收集粪便标本,以SD幽门螺杆菌抗原酶联免疫吸附测定试剂盒和EZ- STEP酶联免疫吸附测定试剂盒为金标准,分析SD BIOLINE幽门螺杆菌抗原快速检测试剂盒的诊断效果。同时采集每位患者的血清样本,使用dBest幽门螺杆菌检测盘检测是否存在幽门螺杆菌抗体。评估敏感性、特异性、预测值和kappa值。结果:对201例消化不良患者的粪便和血清进行分析。SD BIOLINE幽门螺杆菌抗原快速检测的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为95.6% (95%CI, 88.8 ~ 98.8)、92.5% (95%CI, 89 ~ 94.1%)、86.7% (95%CI, 80.5 ~ 89.6)和97.6% (95%CI, 993.9 ~ 99.3)。结论:SD BIOLINE幽门螺杆菌抗原快速检测方法的检测效果优于研究地区现有的抗体检测方法。因此,SD BIOLINE Ag快速大便试验可替代并用于消化不良患者开始治疗前诊断活动性幽门螺杆菌感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of SD BIOLINE H. pylori Ag rapid test against double ELISA with SD H. pylori Ag ELISA and EZ-STEP H. pylori Ag ELISA tests.

Background: Helicobacter pylori antibody titters fall very slowly even after successful treatment. Therefore, tests detecting H. pylori antibody lack specificity and sensitivity. On the other hand, H. pylori stool antigen tests are reported as an alternative assay because of their reliability and simplicity. However, the comparative performance of H. pylori stool antigen tests for detecting the presence of the bacterium in clinical specimens in the study area is not assessed. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the performance of SD BIOLINE H. pylori Ag rapid test with reference to the commercially available EZ- STEP ELISA and SD BIOLINE H. pylori Ag ELISA tests.

Methods: Stool samples were collected to analyse the diagnostic performance of SD BIOLINE H. pylori Ag rapid test kit using SD H. pylori Ag ELISA kit and EZ- STEP ELISA tests as a gold standard. Serum samples were also collected from each patient to test for the presence of H. pylori antibodies using dBest H. pylori Test Disk. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and kappa value are assessed. P values < 0.05 were taken statistically significant.

Results: Stool and serum samples were collected from 201 dyspeptic patients and analysed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the SD BIOLINE H. pylori Ag rapid test were: 95.6% (95% CI, 88.8-98.8), 92.5% (95%CI, 89-94.1%), 86.7% (95% CI, 80.5-89.6), and 97.6% (95% CI, 993.9-99.3) respectively.

Conclusion: The performance of SD BIOLINE H. pylori Ag rapid test was better than the currently available antibody test in study area. Therefore, the SD BIOLINE Ag rapid stool test could replace and be used to diagnose active H. pylori infection before the commencement of therapy among dyspeptic patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Clinical Pathology
BMC Clinical Pathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BMC Clinical Pathology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of histopathology, haematology, clinical biochemistry, and medical microbiology (including virology, parasitology, and infection control). BMC Clinical Pathology (ISSN 1472-6890) is indexed/tracked/covered by PubMed, CAS, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信