{"title":"SD BIOLINE幽门螺杆菌抗原快速检测与SD幽门螺杆菌抗原ELISA和EZ-STEP幽门螺杆菌抗原ELISA双酶联免疫吸附试验的比较","authors":"Markos Negash, Afework Kassu, Bemnet Amare, Gizachew Yismaw, Beyene Moges","doi":"10.1186/s12907-018-0071-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Helicobacter pylori</i> antibody titters fall very slowly even after successful treatment. Therefore, tests detecting <i>H. pylori</i> antibody lack specificity and sensitivity. On the other hand, <i>H. pylori</i> stool antigen tests are reported as an alternative assay because of their reliability and simplicity. However, the comparative performance of <i>H. pylori</i> stool antigen tests for detecting the presence of the bacterium in clinical specimens in the study area is not assessed. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the performance of SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag rapid test with reference to the commercially available EZ- STEP ELISA and SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag ELISA tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Stool samples were collected to analyse the diagnostic performance of SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag rapid test kit using SD <i>H. pylori</i> Ag ELISA kit and EZ- STEP ELISA tests as a gold standard. Serum samples were also collected from each patient to test for the presence of <i>H. pylori</i> antibodies using dBest <i>H. pylori</i> Test Disk. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and kappa value are assessed. <i>P</i> values < 0.05 were taken statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stool and serum samples were collected from 201 dyspeptic patients and analysed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag rapid test were: 95.6% (95% CI, 88.8-98.8), 92.5% (95%CI, 89-94.1%), 86.7% (95% CI, 80.5-89.6), and 97.6% (95% CI, 993.9-99.3) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The performance of SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag rapid test was better than the currently available antibody test in study area. Therefore, the SD BIOLINE Ag rapid stool test could replace and be used to diagnose active <i>H. pylori</i> infection before the commencement of therapy among dyspeptic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":35804,"journal":{"name":"BMC Clinical Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12907-018-0071-6","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag rapid test against double ELISA with SD <i>H. pylori</i> Ag ELISA and EZ-STEP <i>H. pylori</i> Ag ELISA tests.\",\"authors\":\"Markos Negash, Afework Kassu, Bemnet Amare, Gizachew Yismaw, Beyene Moges\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12907-018-0071-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Helicobacter pylori</i> antibody titters fall very slowly even after successful treatment. Therefore, tests detecting <i>H. pylori</i> antibody lack specificity and sensitivity. On the other hand, <i>H. pylori</i> stool antigen tests are reported as an alternative assay because of their reliability and simplicity. However, the comparative performance of <i>H. pylori</i> stool antigen tests for detecting the presence of the bacterium in clinical specimens in the study area is not assessed. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the performance of SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag rapid test with reference to the commercially available EZ- STEP ELISA and SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag ELISA tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Stool samples were collected to analyse the diagnostic performance of SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag rapid test kit using SD <i>H. pylori</i> Ag ELISA kit and EZ- STEP ELISA tests as a gold standard. Serum samples were also collected from each patient to test for the presence of <i>H. pylori</i> antibodies using dBest <i>H. pylori</i> Test Disk. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and kappa value are assessed. <i>P</i> values < 0.05 were taken statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stool and serum samples were collected from 201 dyspeptic patients and analysed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag rapid test were: 95.6% (95% CI, 88.8-98.8), 92.5% (95%CI, 89-94.1%), 86.7% (95% CI, 80.5-89.6), and 97.6% (95% CI, 993.9-99.3) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The performance of SD BIOLINE <i>H. pylori</i> Ag rapid test was better than the currently available antibody test in study area. Therefore, the SD BIOLINE Ag rapid stool test could replace and be used to diagnose active <i>H. pylori</i> infection before the commencement of therapy among dyspeptic patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Clinical Pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12907-018-0071-6\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Clinical Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12907-018-0071-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12907-018-0071-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of SD BIOLINE H. pylori Ag rapid test against double ELISA with SD H. pylori Ag ELISA and EZ-STEP H. pylori Ag ELISA tests.
Background: Helicobacter pylori antibody titters fall very slowly even after successful treatment. Therefore, tests detecting H. pylori antibody lack specificity and sensitivity. On the other hand, H. pylori stool antigen tests are reported as an alternative assay because of their reliability and simplicity. However, the comparative performance of H. pylori stool antigen tests for detecting the presence of the bacterium in clinical specimens in the study area is not assessed. Therefore, in this study we evaluated the performance of SD BIOLINE H. pylori Ag rapid test with reference to the commercially available EZ- STEP ELISA and SD BIOLINE H. pylori Ag ELISA tests.
Methods: Stool samples were collected to analyse the diagnostic performance of SD BIOLINE H. pylori Ag rapid test kit using SD H. pylori Ag ELISA kit and EZ- STEP ELISA tests as a gold standard. Serum samples were also collected from each patient to test for the presence of H. pylori antibodies using dBest H. pylori Test Disk. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and kappa value are assessed. P values < 0.05 were taken statistically significant.
Results: Stool and serum samples were collected from 201 dyspeptic patients and analysed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the SD BIOLINE H. pylori Ag rapid test were: 95.6% (95% CI, 88.8-98.8), 92.5% (95%CI, 89-94.1%), 86.7% (95% CI, 80.5-89.6), and 97.6% (95% CI, 993.9-99.3) respectively.
Conclusion: The performance of SD BIOLINE H. pylori Ag rapid test was better than the currently available antibody test in study area. Therefore, the SD BIOLINE Ag rapid stool test could replace and be used to diagnose active H. pylori infection before the commencement of therapy among dyspeptic patients.
期刊介绍:
BMC Clinical Pathology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of histopathology, haematology, clinical biochemistry, and medical microbiology (including virology, parasitology, and infection control). BMC Clinical Pathology (ISSN 1472-6890) is indexed/tracked/covered by PubMed, CAS, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar.