{"title":"动机性访谈或咨询、药物治疗或不干预以改善成人和青少年的戒烟。","authors":"Abigail R Norris, Jan Estes Miller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CLINICAL QUESTION: In adults and adolescents using cigarettes and/or smokeless tobacco, is motivational interviewing (MI) more effective compared to counseling, medical therapies or no intervention for improving tobacco cessation? ANSWER: yes. Evidence is modest but conclusive that using MI alone or in conjunction with other therapies results in greater rates of tobacco cessation compared to interventions that did not include MI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE OF THE ANSWER: A. DATE SEARCH WAS CONDUCTED: September 2015. LIMITS: Human, English, publication dates 2008 to present, meta-analyses, randomized-control trials, systematic reviews. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Meta-analyses, randomized-control trials, or systematic reviews published during or after 2008 comparing the use of MI to other therapies for tobacco cessation in humans. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies published before 2008, MI used in other substance use disorders besides tobacco.</p>","PeriodicalId":75127,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association","volume":"110 3","pages":"142-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482356/pdf/nihms870861.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motivational interviewing or counseling, medical therapies or no intervention to improve tobacco cessation in adults and adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Abigail R Norris, Jan Estes Miller\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>CLINICAL QUESTION: In adults and adolescents using cigarettes and/or smokeless tobacco, is motivational interviewing (MI) more effective compared to counseling, medical therapies or no intervention for improving tobacco cessation? ANSWER: yes. Evidence is modest but conclusive that using MI alone or in conjunction with other therapies results in greater rates of tobacco cessation compared to interventions that did not include MI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE OF THE ANSWER: A. DATE SEARCH WAS CONDUCTED: September 2015. LIMITS: Human, English, publication dates 2008 to present, meta-analyses, randomized-control trials, systematic reviews. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Meta-analyses, randomized-control trials, or systematic reviews published during or after 2008 comparing the use of MI to other therapies for tobacco cessation in humans. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies published before 2008, MI used in other substance use disorders besides tobacco.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"110 3\",\"pages\":\"142-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5482356/pdf/nihms870861.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Motivational interviewing or counseling, medical therapies or no intervention to improve tobacco cessation in adults and adolescents.
CLINICAL QUESTION: In adults and adolescents using cigarettes and/or smokeless tobacco, is motivational interviewing (MI) more effective compared to counseling, medical therapies or no intervention for improving tobacco cessation? ANSWER: yes. Evidence is modest but conclusive that using MI alone or in conjunction with other therapies results in greater rates of tobacco cessation compared to interventions that did not include MI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE OF THE ANSWER: A. DATE SEARCH WAS CONDUCTED: September 2015. LIMITS: Human, English, publication dates 2008 to present, meta-analyses, randomized-control trials, systematic reviews. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Meta-analyses, randomized-control trials, or systematic reviews published during or after 2008 comparing the use of MI to other therapies for tobacco cessation in humans. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies published before 2008, MI used in other substance use disorders besides tobacco.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
