Madhuri Thakar, Francis Angira, Kovit Pattanapanyasat, Alan H B Wu, Maurice O'Gorman, Hui Zeng, Chenxue Qu, Bharati Mahajan, Kasama Sukapirom, Danying Chen, Yu Hao, Yan Gong, Monika De Arruda Indig, Sharon Graminske, Diana Orta, Nicole d'Empaire, Beverly Lu, Imelda Omana-Zapata, Clement Zeh
{"title":"CD4淋巴细胞计数和血红蛋白评估辅助优先决策:BD FACSPresto™系统的多位点评估","authors":"Madhuri Thakar, Francis Angira, Kovit Pattanapanyasat, Alan H B Wu, Maurice O'Gorman, Hui Zeng, Chenxue Qu, Bharati Mahajan, Kasama Sukapirom, Danying Chen, Yu Hao, Yan Gong, Monika De Arruda Indig, Sharon Graminske, Diana Orta, Nicole d'Empaire, Beverly Lu, Imelda Omana-Zapata, Clement Zeh","doi":"10.2174/1874613601711010076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The BD FACSPresto<sup>™</sup> system uses capillary and venous blood to measure CD4 absolute counts (CD4), %CD4 in lymphocytes, and hemoglobin (Hb) in approximately 25 minutes. CD4 cell count is used with portable CD4 counters in resource-limited settings to manage HIV/AIDS patients. A method comparison was performed using capillary and venous samples from seven clinical laboratories in five countries. The BD FACSPresto system was assessed for variability between laboratory, instrument/operators, cartridge lots and within-run at four sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Samples were collected under approved voluntary consent. EDTA-anticoagulated venous samples were tested for CD4 and %CD4 T cells using the gold-standard BD FACSCalibur<sup>™</sup> system, and for Hb, using the Sysmex<sup>®</sup> KX-21N<sup>™</sup> analyzer. Venous and capillary samples were tested on the BD FACSPresto system. Matched data was analyzed for bias (Deming linear regression and Bland-Altman methods), and for concordance around the clinical decision point. The coefficient of variation was estimated per site, instrument/operator, cartridge-lot and between-runs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For method comparison, 93% of the 720 samples were from HIV-positive and 7% from HIV-negative or normal subjects. CD4 and %CD4 T cells venous and capillary results gave slopes within 0.96-1.05 and R<sup>2</sup> ≥0.96; Hb slopes were ≥1.00 and R<sup>2</sup> ≥0.89. Variability across sites/operators gave %CV <5.8% for CD4 counts, <1.9% for %CD4 and <3.2% for Hb. The total %CV was <7.7% across instrument/cartridge lot.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BD FACSPresto system provides accurate, reliable, precise CD4/%CD4/Hb results compared to gold-standard methods, irrespective of venous or capillary blood sampling. The data showed good agreement between the BD FACSPresto, BD FACSCalibur and Sysmex systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":515834,"journal":{"name":"The Open AIDS Journal","volume":"11 ","pages":"76-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730955/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CD4 Lymphocyte Enumeration and Hemoglobin Assessment Aid for Priority Decisions: A Multisite Evaluation of the BD FACSPresto<sup>™</sup> System.\",\"authors\":\"Madhuri Thakar, Francis Angira, Kovit Pattanapanyasat, Alan H B Wu, Maurice O'Gorman, Hui Zeng, Chenxue Qu, Bharati Mahajan, Kasama Sukapirom, Danying Chen, Yu Hao, Yan Gong, Monika De Arruda Indig, Sharon Graminske, Diana Orta, Nicole d'Empaire, Beverly Lu, Imelda Omana-Zapata, Clement Zeh\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874613601711010076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The BD FACSPresto<sup>™</sup> system uses capillary and venous blood to measure CD4 absolute counts (CD4), %CD4 in lymphocytes, and hemoglobin (Hb) in approximately 25 minutes. CD4 cell count is used with portable CD4 counters in resource-limited settings to manage HIV/AIDS patients. A method comparison was performed using capillary and venous samples from seven clinical laboratories in five countries. The BD FACSPresto system was assessed for variability between laboratory, instrument/operators, cartridge lots and within-run at four sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Samples were collected under approved voluntary consent. EDTA-anticoagulated venous samples were tested for CD4 and %CD4 T cells using the gold-standard BD FACSCalibur<sup>™</sup> system, and for Hb, using the Sysmex<sup>®</sup> KX-21N<sup>™</sup> analyzer. Venous and capillary samples were tested on the BD FACSPresto system. Matched data was analyzed for bias (Deming linear regression and Bland-Altman methods), and for concordance around the clinical decision point. The coefficient of variation was estimated per site, instrument/operator, cartridge-lot and between-runs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For method comparison, 93% of the 720 samples were from HIV-positive and 7% from HIV-negative or normal subjects. CD4 and %CD4 T cells venous and capillary results gave slopes within 0.96-1.05 and R<sup>2</sup> ≥0.96; Hb slopes were ≥1.00 and R<sup>2</sup> ≥0.89. Variability across sites/operators gave %CV <5.8% for CD4 counts, <1.9% for %CD4 and <3.2% for Hb. The total %CV was <7.7% across instrument/cartridge lot.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BD FACSPresto system provides accurate, reliable, precise CD4/%CD4/Hb results compared to gold-standard methods, irrespective of venous or capillary blood sampling. The data showed good agreement between the BD FACSPresto, BD FACSCalibur and Sysmex systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":515834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open AIDS Journal\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"76-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730955/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open AIDS Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874613601711010076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open AIDS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874613601711010076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
CD4 Lymphocyte Enumeration and Hemoglobin Assessment Aid for Priority Decisions: A Multisite Evaluation of the BD FACSPresto™ System.
Background: The BD FACSPresto™ system uses capillary and venous blood to measure CD4 absolute counts (CD4), %CD4 in lymphocytes, and hemoglobin (Hb) in approximately 25 minutes. CD4 cell count is used with portable CD4 counters in resource-limited settings to manage HIV/AIDS patients. A method comparison was performed using capillary and venous samples from seven clinical laboratories in five countries. The BD FACSPresto system was assessed for variability between laboratory, instrument/operators, cartridge lots and within-run at four sites.
Methods: Samples were collected under approved voluntary consent. EDTA-anticoagulated venous samples were tested for CD4 and %CD4 T cells using the gold-standard BD FACSCalibur™ system, and for Hb, using the Sysmex® KX-21N™ analyzer. Venous and capillary samples were tested on the BD FACSPresto system. Matched data was analyzed for bias (Deming linear regression and Bland-Altman methods), and for concordance around the clinical decision point. The coefficient of variation was estimated per site, instrument/operator, cartridge-lot and between-runs.
Results: For method comparison, 93% of the 720 samples were from HIV-positive and 7% from HIV-negative or normal subjects. CD4 and %CD4 T cells venous and capillary results gave slopes within 0.96-1.05 and R2 ≥0.96; Hb slopes were ≥1.00 and R2 ≥0.89. Variability across sites/operators gave %CV <5.8% for CD4 counts, <1.9% for %CD4 and <3.2% for Hb. The total %CV was <7.7% across instrument/cartridge lot.
Conclusion: The BD FACSPresto system provides accurate, reliable, precise CD4/%CD4/Hb results compared to gold-standard methods, irrespective of venous or capillary blood sampling. The data showed good agreement between the BD FACSPresto, BD FACSCalibur and Sysmex systems.