{"title":"针、内激活器和激光激活灌洗过度根管的安全性比较。","authors":"Ozgur Genc Sen, Melih Kaya","doi":"10.1089/pho.2017.4380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) irrigation using three different techniques during the final rinse in overinstrumented root canals.</p><p><strong>Background data: </strong>The effect of irrigant activation on irrigant extrusion from overinstrumented root canals is still unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 single-rooted teeth were decoronated. The working lengths were determined and the roots were divided into two groups of 15 teeth each: group 1, instrumentation 0.5 mm short of the apical foramen and group 2, instrumentation 0.5 mm beyond the apical foramen (overinstrumented). Needle irrigation (NI), sonic irrigation with EndoActivator (EAI), and laser-activated irrigation (LAI) were used for the final rinse in each group; each root underwent the three irrigation procedures in a randomized crossover manner. A modified container-foam model was used to collect apically extruded NaOCl. The weight of the extruded NaOCl was calculated by subtracting the initial weights of the containers from their final weights. All data were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The amount of NaOCl extrusion was similar with all three irrigation systems in group 1. In group 2, the amount of extruded NaOCl was significantly greater with EAI than with NI and LAI. EAI and LAI caused significantly greater extrusion in group 2 than in group 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EAI, NI, and LAI are equally safe for irrigating canals with intact apices. However, the risk of irrigant extrusion can increase in overinstrumented canals, with EAI associated with a greater risk compared with NI and LAI.</p>","PeriodicalId":20117,"journal":{"name":"Photomedicine and laser surgery","volume":"36 4","pages":"198-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/pho.2017.4380","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Safety of Needle, EndoActivator, and Laser-Activated Irrigation in Overinstrumented Root Canals.\",\"authors\":\"Ozgur Genc Sen, Melih Kaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/pho.2017.4380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) irrigation using three different techniques during the final rinse in overinstrumented root canals.</p><p><strong>Background data: </strong>The effect of irrigant activation on irrigant extrusion from overinstrumented root canals is still unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 single-rooted teeth were decoronated. The working lengths were determined and the roots were divided into two groups of 15 teeth each: group 1, instrumentation 0.5 mm short of the apical foramen and group 2, instrumentation 0.5 mm beyond the apical foramen (overinstrumented). Needle irrigation (NI), sonic irrigation with EndoActivator (EAI), and laser-activated irrigation (LAI) were used for the final rinse in each group; each root underwent the three irrigation procedures in a randomized crossover manner. A modified container-foam model was used to collect apically extruded NaOCl. The weight of the extruded NaOCl was calculated by subtracting the initial weights of the containers from their final weights. All data were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The amount of NaOCl extrusion was similar with all three irrigation systems in group 1. In group 2, the amount of extruded NaOCl was significantly greater with EAI than with NI and LAI. EAI and LAI caused significantly greater extrusion in group 2 than in group 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EAI, NI, and LAI are equally safe for irrigating canals with intact apices. However, the risk of irrigant extrusion can increase in overinstrumented canals, with EAI associated with a greater risk compared with NI and LAI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photomedicine and laser surgery\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"198-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/pho.2017.4380\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photomedicine and laser surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2017.4380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/12/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photomedicine and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2017.4380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
目的:评价次氯酸钠(NaOCl)灌洗在过度根管根管冲洗中三种不同技术的安全性。背景资料:灌洗剂激活对从过度器械根管中挤出灌洗剂的影响尚不清楚。方法:对30颗单根牙进行修复。确定工作长度,将牙根分为两组,每组15颗牙:1组内固定距根尖孔0.5 mm, 2组内固定距根尖孔0.5 mm(过度内固定)。各组最后冲洗采用针冲洗(NI)、超声冲洗(EAI)和激光冲洗(LAI);每个根以随机交叉的方式进行三次灌溉。采用改进的容器-泡沫模型收集顶尖挤压的NaOCl。通过从容器的最终重量减去容器的初始重量来计算挤出的NaOCl的重量。所有资料均进行统计学分析。结果:1组三种灌洗方式下NaOCl挤出量基本相同。在2组中,EAI组的NaOCl挤压量明显大于NI组和LAI组。EAI和LAI对2组的挤压作用明显大于1组。结论:EAI、NI和LAI在根尖完好的灌渠中同样安全。然而,灌溉水挤压的风险在过度器械化的管道中会增加,与NI和LAI相比,EAI的风险更大。
Comparative Safety of Needle, EndoActivator, and Laser-Activated Irrigation in Overinstrumented Root Canals.
Objective: To evaluate the safety of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) irrigation using three different techniques during the final rinse in overinstrumented root canals.
Background data: The effect of irrigant activation on irrigant extrusion from overinstrumented root canals is still unclear.
Methods: A total of 30 single-rooted teeth were decoronated. The working lengths were determined and the roots were divided into two groups of 15 teeth each: group 1, instrumentation 0.5 mm short of the apical foramen and group 2, instrumentation 0.5 mm beyond the apical foramen (overinstrumented). Needle irrigation (NI), sonic irrigation with EndoActivator (EAI), and laser-activated irrigation (LAI) were used for the final rinse in each group; each root underwent the three irrigation procedures in a randomized crossover manner. A modified container-foam model was used to collect apically extruded NaOCl. The weight of the extruded NaOCl was calculated by subtracting the initial weights of the containers from their final weights. All data were statistically analyzed.
Results: The amount of NaOCl extrusion was similar with all three irrigation systems in group 1. In group 2, the amount of extruded NaOCl was significantly greater with EAI than with NI and LAI. EAI and LAI caused significantly greater extrusion in group 2 than in group 1.
Conclusions: EAI, NI, and LAI are equally safe for irrigating canals with intact apices. However, the risk of irrigant extrusion can increase in overinstrumented canals, with EAI associated with a greater risk compared with NI and LAI.
期刊介绍:
Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery (formerly Photomedicine and Laser Surgery) is the essential journal for cutting-edge advances and research in phototherapy, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), and laser medicine and surgery. The Journal delivers basic and clinical findings and procedures to improve the knowledge and application of these techniques in medicine.