目前的OCT方法不能可靠地识别tcfa。

Mark E Brezinski, Kishore J Harjai
{"title":"目前的OCT方法不能可靠地识别tcfa。","authors":"Mark E Brezinski,&nbsp;Kishore J Harjai","doi":"10.4172/2155-9880.1000350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is now clearly established that Thin-Capped Fibroatheromas (TCFAs) lead to most Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACSs). The ability to selectively intervene on TCFAs predisposed to rupture and ACSs would dramatically alter the practice of cardiology. While the ability of OCT to identify thin walled plaques at micron scale resolutions has represented a major advance, it is a misconception that it can reliably identify TCFAs. One major reason is that the 'diffuse border' criteria currently used to determine 'lipid plaque' is almost undoubtedly from high scattering in the intima and not because of core composition (necrotic core). A second reason is that, rather than looking at lipid collections, studies need to be focused on identifying necrotic cores with OCT. Necrotic cores are characteristic of TCFAs and not lipid collections. Numerous other OCT approaches are available which can potentially accurately assess TCFAs, but these have not been aggressively pursed which we believe likely stems in part from the misconceptions over the efficacy of 'diffuse borders'.</p>","PeriodicalId":89581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical & experimental cardiology","volume":"5 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2155-9880.1000350","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current OCT Approaches Do Not Reliably Identify TCFAs.\",\"authors\":\"Mark E Brezinski,&nbsp;Kishore J Harjai\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-9880.1000350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It is now clearly established that Thin-Capped Fibroatheromas (TCFAs) lead to most Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACSs). The ability to selectively intervene on TCFAs predisposed to rupture and ACSs would dramatically alter the practice of cardiology. While the ability of OCT to identify thin walled plaques at micron scale resolutions has represented a major advance, it is a misconception that it can reliably identify TCFAs. One major reason is that the 'diffuse border' criteria currently used to determine 'lipid plaque' is almost undoubtedly from high scattering in the intima and not because of core composition (necrotic core). A second reason is that, rather than looking at lipid collections, studies need to be focused on identifying necrotic cores with OCT. Necrotic cores are characteristic of TCFAs and not lipid collections. Numerous other OCT approaches are available which can potentially accurately assess TCFAs, but these have not been aggressively pursed which we believe likely stems in part from the misconceptions over the efficacy of 'diffuse borders'.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical & experimental cardiology\",\"volume\":\"5 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2155-9880.1000350\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical & experimental cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9880.1000350\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical & experimental cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9880.1000350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

现在已经清楚地确定薄帽纤维粥样硬化(TCFAs)导致大多数急性冠脉综合征(ACSs)。选择性干预易发生破裂和ACSs的TCFAs的能力将极大地改变心脏病学的实践。虽然OCT在微米级分辨率下识别薄壁斑块的能力已经取得了重大进展,但认为它可以可靠地识别TCFAs是一种误解。一个主要原因是目前用于确定“脂质斑块”的“弥漫性边界”标准几乎毫无疑问是来自内膜的高散射,而不是因为核心成分(坏死核心)。第二个原因是,与其观察脂质收集,研究需要集中在识别坏死核心与oct,坏死核心是TCFAs的特征,而不是脂质收集。有许多其他OCT方法可以准确地评估tcfa,但这些方法并没有得到积极的应用,我们认为这可能部分源于对“弥散边界”有效性的误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Current OCT Approaches Do Not Reliably Identify TCFAs.

Current OCT Approaches Do Not Reliably Identify TCFAs.

Current OCT Approaches Do Not Reliably Identify TCFAs.

Current OCT Approaches Do Not Reliably Identify TCFAs.

It is now clearly established that Thin-Capped Fibroatheromas (TCFAs) lead to most Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACSs). The ability to selectively intervene on TCFAs predisposed to rupture and ACSs would dramatically alter the practice of cardiology. While the ability of OCT to identify thin walled plaques at micron scale resolutions has represented a major advance, it is a misconception that it can reliably identify TCFAs. One major reason is that the 'diffuse border' criteria currently used to determine 'lipid plaque' is almost undoubtedly from high scattering in the intima and not because of core composition (necrotic core). A second reason is that, rather than looking at lipid collections, studies need to be focused on identifying necrotic cores with OCT. Necrotic cores are characteristic of TCFAs and not lipid collections. Numerous other OCT approaches are available which can potentially accurately assess TCFAs, but these have not been aggressively pursed which we believe likely stems in part from the misconceptions over the efficacy of 'diffuse borders'.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信