化学教育研究与实践中定量数据研究效度的思考

IF 3.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Scott E. Lewis
{"title":"化学教育研究与实践中定量数据研究效度的思考","authors":"Scott E. Lewis","doi":"10.1039/D2RP90009B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >An explicit account of validity considerations within a published paper allows readers to evaluate the evidence that supports the interpretation and use of the data collected within a project. This editorial is meant to provide considerations on how validity has been presented and reviewed among papers submitted to <em>Chemistry Education Research and Practice</em> (CERP) that analyze quantitative data. Authors submitting to CERP are encouraged to make an explicit case for validity and this editorial describes the varying sources of evidence that can be used to organize the evidence presented for validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 4","pages":" 764-767"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considerations on validity for studies using quantitative data in chemistry education research and practice\",\"authors\":\"Scott E. Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D2RP90009B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >An explicit account of validity considerations within a published paper allows readers to evaluate the evidence that supports the interpretation and use of the data collected within a project. This editorial is meant to provide considerations on how validity has been presented and reviewed among papers submitted to <em>Chemistry Education Research and Practice</em> (CERP) that analyze quantitative data. Authors submitting to CERP are encouraged to make an explicit case for validity and this editorial describes the varying sources of evidence that can be used to organize the evidence presented for validity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":69,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemistry Education Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\" 4\",\"pages\":\" 764-767\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemistry Education Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/rp/d2rp90009b\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/rp/d2rp90009b","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在已发表的论文中对有效性考虑的明确说明允许读者评估支持解释和使用项目中收集的数据的证据。这篇社论旨在对提交给化学教育研究与实践(CERP)的分析定量数据的论文的有效性如何提出和审查提供一些考虑。向CERP提交的作者被鼓励对有效性提出明确的案例,本社论描述了可用于组织有效性证据的不同证据来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Considerations on validity for studies using quantitative data in chemistry education research and practice

An explicit account of validity considerations within a published paper allows readers to evaluate the evidence that supports the interpretation and use of the data collected within a project. This editorial is meant to provide considerations on how validity has been presented and reviewed among papers submitted to Chemistry Education Research and Practice (CERP) that analyze quantitative data. Authors submitting to CERP are encouraged to make an explicit case for validity and this editorial describes the varying sources of evidence that can be used to organize the evidence presented for validity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信