完全不运动和低运动量老年男性之间的差异及其对运动干预的反应:退伍军人 LIFE 研究。

Healthy aging research Pub Date : 2015-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-09-07 DOI:10.12715/har.2015.4.36
Matthew J Peterson, Carl F Pieper, Richard Sloane, Gail M Crowley, Patricia A Cowper, Eleanor S McConnell, Hayden B Bosworth, Carola C Ekelund, Megan P Pearson, Katherine S Hall, Miriam C Morey
{"title":"完全不运动和低运动量老年男性之间的差异及其对运动干预的反应:退伍军人 LIFE 研究。","authors":"Matthew J Peterson, Carl F Pieper, Richard Sloane, Gail M Crowley, Patricia A Cowper, Eleanor S McConnell, Hayden B Bosworth, Carola C Ekelund, Megan P Pearson, Katherine S Hall, Miriam C Morey","doi":"10.12715/har.2015.4.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity interventions typically do not report behavioral changes in activity sub-groups. The aim of this study was to compare baseline differences and changes in physical activity between truly physically inactive men and low active men enrolled in a twelve-month, home-based physical activity intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Veterans with a mean age of 77.6 years were randomized to either a physical activity intervention or usual care. Measures included self-reported physical activity, physical function, and physical performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the physically inactive group reported more symptoms and poorer functioning than the low active group. At 12 months, physically inactive men randomized to the intervention group increased their physical activity to an average of 73.3 minutes per week. Physically inactive individuals randomized to the control group were eight times more likely to remain inactive compared to the low active group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Completely physically inactive older men can markedly increase physical activity levels with a long-term intervention. Without such intervention, the likelihood of this group remaining inactive is eightfold.</p>","PeriodicalId":90841,"journal":{"name":"Healthy aging research","volume":"4 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5650070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences between completely physically inactive and low active older men and their response to an exercise intervention: the Veterans LIFE study.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew J Peterson, Carl F Pieper, Richard Sloane, Gail M Crowley, Patricia A Cowper, Eleanor S McConnell, Hayden B Bosworth, Carola C Ekelund, Megan P Pearson, Katherine S Hall, Miriam C Morey\",\"doi\":\"10.12715/har.2015.4.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity interventions typically do not report behavioral changes in activity sub-groups. The aim of this study was to compare baseline differences and changes in physical activity between truly physically inactive men and low active men enrolled in a twelve-month, home-based physical activity intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Veterans with a mean age of 77.6 years were randomized to either a physical activity intervention or usual care. Measures included self-reported physical activity, physical function, and physical performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the physically inactive group reported more symptoms and poorer functioning than the low active group. At 12 months, physically inactive men randomized to the intervention group increased their physical activity to an average of 73.3 minutes per week. Physically inactive individuals randomized to the control group were eight times more likely to remain inactive compared to the low active group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Completely physically inactive older men can markedly increase physical activity levels with a long-term intervention. Without such intervention, the likelihood of this group remaining inactive is eightfold.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthy aging research\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5650070/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthy aging research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12715/har.2015.4.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/9/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthy aging research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12715/har.2015.4.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:体力活动干预通常不会报告活动亚组的行为变化。本研究的目的是比较参加为期 12 个月的家庭体育锻炼干预的真正缺乏体育锻炼的男性和缺乏体育锻炼的男性在体育锻炼方面的基线差异和变化:方法:平均年龄为 77.6 岁的退伍军人被随机分配到体育锻炼干预或常规护理中。测量指标包括自我报告的体力活动、身体功能和体能表现:结果:基线时,不参加体育锻炼组比不参加体育锻炼组报告的症状更多,功能更差。12 个月后,被随机分配到干预组的非运动男性的运动量增加到平均每周 73.3 分钟。与低活动量组相比,被随机分配到对照组的不运动者保持不运动的可能性要高出八倍:结论:完全不运动的老年男性可以通过长期干预显著提高运动水平。结论:完全不参加体育活动的老年男性可以通过长期干预显著提高体育活动水平,如果不采取这种干预措施,该群体继续不参加体育活动的可能性会增加八倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences between completely physically inactive and low active older men and their response to an exercise intervention: the Veterans LIFE study.

Background: Physical activity interventions typically do not report behavioral changes in activity sub-groups. The aim of this study was to compare baseline differences and changes in physical activity between truly physically inactive men and low active men enrolled in a twelve-month, home-based physical activity intervention.

Methods: Veterans with a mean age of 77.6 years were randomized to either a physical activity intervention or usual care. Measures included self-reported physical activity, physical function, and physical performance.

Results: At baseline, the physically inactive group reported more symptoms and poorer functioning than the low active group. At 12 months, physically inactive men randomized to the intervention group increased their physical activity to an average of 73.3 minutes per week. Physically inactive individuals randomized to the control group were eight times more likely to remain inactive compared to the low active group.

Conclusions: Completely physically inactive older men can markedly increase physical activity levels with a long-term intervention. Without such intervention, the likelihood of this group remaining inactive is eightfold.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信