Tatevik Balayan, Hacsi Horvath, George W Rutherford
{"title":"利托那韦加达鲁那韦加两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂与其他治疗方案对艾滋病病毒感染者的初始抗逆转录病毒疗法的比较:系统回顾。","authors":"Tatevik Balayan, Hacsi Horvath, George W Rutherford","doi":"10.1155/2017/2345617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Darunavir is a second-generation protease-inhibitor used with ritonavir (DRV/r) and two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors as an option in first-line antiretroviral treatment (ART).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DRV/r versus other regimens in patients initiating ART. We searched five bibliographic databases and other key resources. We had no language limitations. We assessed bias risk with the Cochrane tool and used GRADE to assess evidence quality. We report findings in terms of risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Three RCTs met inclusion criteria. In plasma viral load suppression, DRV/r outperformed ritonavir-boosted lopinavir at 48 weeks (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.25), 96 weeks (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21), and 192 weeks (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.07-1.35). DRV/r was similar to dolutegravir at 48 weeks (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.87-1.06) but less effective at 96 weeks (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.93). At 96 weeks, DRV/r underperformed raltegravir (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-0.99) but was similar to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.96-1.09). Overall bias risk was moderate. Evidence quality was also moderate.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Initial ART regimens using DRV/r should be considered in future World Health Organization guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":46303,"journal":{"name":"AIDS Research and Treatment","volume":"2017 ","pages":"2345617"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5634582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ritonavir-Boosted Darunavir Plus Two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors versus Other Regimens for Initial Antiretroviral Therapy for People with HIV Infection: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Tatevik Balayan, Hacsi Horvath, George W Rutherford\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2017/2345617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Darunavir is a second-generation protease-inhibitor used with ritonavir (DRV/r) and two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors as an option in first-line antiretroviral treatment (ART).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DRV/r versus other regimens in patients initiating ART. We searched five bibliographic databases and other key resources. We had no language limitations. We assessed bias risk with the Cochrane tool and used GRADE to assess evidence quality. We report findings in terms of risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Three RCTs met inclusion criteria. In plasma viral load suppression, DRV/r outperformed ritonavir-boosted lopinavir at 48 weeks (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.25), 96 weeks (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21), and 192 weeks (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.07-1.35). DRV/r was similar to dolutegravir at 48 weeks (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.87-1.06) but less effective at 96 weeks (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.93). At 96 weeks, DRV/r underperformed raltegravir (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-0.99) but was similar to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.96-1.09). Overall bias risk was moderate. Evidence quality was also moderate.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Initial ART regimens using DRV/r should be considered in future World Health Organization guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIDS Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\"2017 \",\"pages\":\"2345617\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5634582/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIDS Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2345617\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2345617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:达芦那韦是第二代蛋白酶抑制剂,与利托那韦(DRV/r)和两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂一起使用,是一线抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的一种选择:我们系统回顾了在开始接受抗逆转录病毒疗法的患者中使用 DRV/r 与其他疗法的随机对照试验 (RCT)。我们检索了五个文献数据库和其他重要资源。我们没有语言限制。我们使用 Cochrane 工具评估了偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 评估了证据质量。我们以风险比(RR)和 95% 置信区间(CI)来报告研究结果:三项 RCT 符合纳入标准。在血浆病毒载量抑制方面,48周(RR 1.13,95% CI 1.03-1.25)、96周(RR 1.11,95% CI 1.02-1.21)和192周(RR 1.20,95% CI 1.07-1.35)时,DRV/r的疗效优于利托那韦增强型洛匹那韦。在48周时,DRV/r与多罗替拉韦相似(RR 0.96,95% CI 0.87-1.06),但在96周时效果较差(RR 0.84,95% CI 0.75-0.93)。在96周时,DRV/r的疗效低于雷特格韦(RR为0.94,95% CI为0.88-0.99),但与利托那韦增效的阿扎那韦(RR为1.02,95% CI为0.96-1.09)相似。总体偏倚风险为中度。证据质量也为中等:解读:世界卫生组织未来的指南应考虑使用DRV/r的初始抗逆转录病毒疗法。
Ritonavir-Boosted Darunavir Plus Two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors versus Other Regimens for Initial Antiretroviral Therapy for People with HIV Infection: A Systematic Review.
Background: Darunavir is a second-generation protease-inhibitor used with ritonavir (DRV/r) and two nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors as an option in first-line antiretroviral treatment (ART).
Methods: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DRV/r versus other regimens in patients initiating ART. We searched five bibliographic databases and other key resources. We had no language limitations. We assessed bias risk with the Cochrane tool and used GRADE to assess evidence quality. We report findings in terms of risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Findings: Three RCTs met inclusion criteria. In plasma viral load suppression, DRV/r outperformed ritonavir-boosted lopinavir at 48 weeks (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.25), 96 weeks (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21), and 192 weeks (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.07-1.35). DRV/r was similar to dolutegravir at 48 weeks (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.87-1.06) but less effective at 96 weeks (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.93). At 96 weeks, DRV/r underperformed raltegravir (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-0.99) but was similar to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.96-1.09). Overall bias risk was moderate. Evidence quality was also moderate.
Interpretation: Initial ART regimens using DRV/r should be considered in future World Health Organization guidelines.
期刊介绍:
AIDS Research and Treatment is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focused on all aspects of HIV and AIDS, from the molecular basis of disease to translational and clinical research. In addition, articles relating to prevention, education, and behavior change will be considered