准备瞄准!射击!瞄准正确的医学科学杂志。

Cardiovascular endocrinology Pub Date : 2017-09-01 Epub Date: 2016-06-29 DOI:10.1097/XCE.0000000000000083
Timothy C Hardman, James M Serginson
{"title":"准备瞄准!射击!瞄准正确的医学科学杂志。","authors":"Timothy C Hardman, James M Serginson","doi":"10.1097/XCE.0000000000000083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Inadvertently submitting a paper to a journal that is unlikely to publish it is a waste of resources and ultimately delays dissemination of one's research. A high proportion of manuscripts are rejected by their author's first-choice journal. The aim of the present work was to review guidance provided within the literature for journal selection that might minimize the chance of manuscript rejection. We also consider papers that encompass more than one main medical science and describe the selection process that we used with a paper that was published in <i>Cardiovascular Endocrinology</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A database search (Embase, PubMed and Medworm) was performed for all articles published in the scientific literature providing guidance on journal selection. Articles were identified that either had journal selection as their principal topic or included journal selection as part of a broader discussion of publishing. The relative performance of four free-to-use, web-based applications that claim to provide guidance on journal selection was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The searches identified 286 hits, of which 249 were in English. Of these papers, 16 discussed journal selection and a further 10 articles were identified from citations within the original 16 articles. Only one article described a comprehensive model for submission decision-making. Identification of appropriate candidate journals by various web-based applications was erratic, with the Jane database providing the most robust suggestions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our work suggests that little attention has been focused in the scientific literature on the mechanisms that authors use to select a journal for their work. Nevertheless, scientists for the most part seem to have a good sense of where their papers are most likely to be accepted. Beyond ensuring that a manuscript fulfils all the target journal's requirements, the literature suggests that it is important to have an objective view of the scientific contribution or 'value' of your work.</p>","PeriodicalId":72529,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular endocrinology","volume":"6 3","pages":"95-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4c/79/ce-6-095.PMC5567399.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ready! Aim! Fire! targeting the right medical science journal.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy C Hardman, James M Serginson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/XCE.0000000000000083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Inadvertently submitting a paper to a journal that is unlikely to publish it is a waste of resources and ultimately delays dissemination of one's research. A high proportion of manuscripts are rejected by their author's first-choice journal. The aim of the present work was to review guidance provided within the literature for journal selection that might minimize the chance of manuscript rejection. We also consider papers that encompass more than one main medical science and describe the selection process that we used with a paper that was published in <i>Cardiovascular Endocrinology</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A database search (Embase, PubMed and Medworm) was performed for all articles published in the scientific literature providing guidance on journal selection. Articles were identified that either had journal selection as their principal topic or included journal selection as part of a broader discussion of publishing. The relative performance of four free-to-use, web-based applications that claim to provide guidance on journal selection was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The searches identified 286 hits, of which 249 were in English. Of these papers, 16 discussed journal selection and a further 10 articles were identified from citations within the original 16 articles. Only one article described a comprehensive model for submission decision-making. Identification of appropriate candidate journals by various web-based applications was erratic, with the Jane database providing the most robust suggestions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our work suggests that little attention has been focused in the scientific literature on the mechanisms that authors use to select a journal for their work. Nevertheless, scientists for the most part seem to have a good sense of where their papers are most likely to be accepted. Beyond ensuring that a manuscript fulfils all the target journal's requirements, the literature suggests that it is important to have an objective view of the scientific contribution or 'value' of your work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"95-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4c/79/ce-6-095.PMC5567399.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCE.0000000000000083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/6/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCE.0000000000000083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:无意中向不可能发表论文的期刊投稿是一种资源浪费,最终会延误研究成果的传播。很大一部分稿件都被作者首选的期刊退稿。本研究旨在回顾文献中提供的期刊选择指南,以尽量减少稿件被拒的几率。我们还考虑了包含多个主要医学科学的论文,并介绍了我们在《心血管内分泌学》上发表的一篇论文的选择过程:我们在数据库(Embase、PubMed 和 Medworm)中搜索了科学文献中发表的所有文章,为期刊选择提供指导。所发现的文章要么以期刊选择为主要议题,要么将期刊选择作为更广泛的出版讨论的一部分。比较了四种声称提供期刊选择指导的免费网络应用程序的相对性能:搜索发现了 286 篇论文,其中 249 篇为英文论文。在这些论文中,有 16 篇讨论了期刊选择问题,另有 10 篇文章是通过引用这 16 篇文章中的原文获得的。只有一篇文章介绍了投稿决策的综合模型。各种网络应用程序对合适候选期刊的识别并不稳定,简数据库提供的建议最为可靠:我们的研究表明,科学文献很少关注作者为其作品选择期刊的机制。不过,大多数科学家似乎都很清楚自己的论文最有可能被哪家期刊录用。除了确保稿件符合目标期刊的所有要求外,文献还表明,客观看待自己工作的科学贡献或 "价值 "也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ready! Aim! Fire! targeting the right medical science journal.

Ready! Aim! Fire! targeting the right medical science journal.

Ready! Aim! Fire! targeting the right medical science journal.

Ready! Aim! Fire! targeting the right medical science journal.

Objective: Inadvertently submitting a paper to a journal that is unlikely to publish it is a waste of resources and ultimately delays dissemination of one's research. A high proportion of manuscripts are rejected by their author's first-choice journal. The aim of the present work was to review guidance provided within the literature for journal selection that might minimize the chance of manuscript rejection. We also consider papers that encompass more than one main medical science and describe the selection process that we used with a paper that was published in Cardiovascular Endocrinology.

Methods: A database search (Embase, PubMed and Medworm) was performed for all articles published in the scientific literature providing guidance on journal selection. Articles were identified that either had journal selection as their principal topic or included journal selection as part of a broader discussion of publishing. The relative performance of four free-to-use, web-based applications that claim to provide guidance on journal selection was compared.

Results: The searches identified 286 hits, of which 249 were in English. Of these papers, 16 discussed journal selection and a further 10 articles were identified from citations within the original 16 articles. Only one article described a comprehensive model for submission decision-making. Identification of appropriate candidate journals by various web-based applications was erratic, with the Jane database providing the most robust suggestions.

Conclusion: Our work suggests that little attention has been focused in the scientific literature on the mechanisms that authors use to select a journal for their work. Nevertheless, scientists for the most part seem to have a good sense of where their papers are most likely to be accepted. Beyond ensuring that a manuscript fulfils all the target journal's requirements, the literature suggests that it is important to have an objective view of the scientific contribution or 'value' of your work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信