常规培养与核酸扩增试验筛查无症状男男性行为者尿道淋病奈瑟菌感染的比较

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Pragmatic and Observational Research Pub Date : 2017-09-01 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2147/POR.S137377
Jiratha Budkaew, Bandit Chumworathayi, Chamsai Pientong, Tipaya Ekalaksananan
{"title":"常规培养与核酸扩增试验筛查无症状男男性行为者尿道淋病奈瑟菌感染的比较","authors":"Jiratha Budkaew,&nbsp;Bandit Chumworathayi,&nbsp;Chamsai Pientong,&nbsp;Tipaya Ekalaksananan","doi":"10.2147/POR.S137377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many methods are used to detect urethral <i>Neisseria gonorrhea</i> (<i>NG</i>) infection among asymptomatic men who have sex with men (MSM). The objective of this study was to define the performance of conventional culture compared to real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for diagnosis of asymptomatic urethral gonorrhea among MSM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 147 clinical specimens for <i>NG</i> testing from asymptomatic participants were evaluated. MSM >18 years old who consented to undergo urethral swab and collection of urine samples from two clinics (one was the sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) mobile clinic and the second was the antiretroviral clinic) located in Khon Kaen, Thailand, were recruited. For conventional culture, 147 swab specimens from urethra were analyzed. For real-time PCR, the same samples and collected urine (147 urethral swab and 62 urine) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were predominately older aged (mean age: 28.79 years, range: 18-54), asymptomatic (99.3%), and engaged in sex with multiple partners (63% had at least two partners and 36% had at least three partners during the previous 3 months). Twenty-five MSM (17%) had history of STD, mainly human immunodeficiency virus infection. Of the 147 specimens, 42 were positive for <i>NG</i> detected by real-time PCR (prevalence: 28.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.8%-32.4%), while none of the 147 MSM were positive for <i>NG</i> detected by conventional culture (prevalence: 0.0%, 95% CI: 0.0%-7.3%). These findings indicated that conventional culture had low sensitivity but high specificity (0.0% and 100%, respectively). We could not demonstrate that many of the factors that were identified in other studies were associated to increased (or decreased) risk of urethral gonococcal infection in our population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In asymptomatic MSM, nucleic acid amplification tests are more appropriate for screening of urethral <i>NG</i> infection than conventional culture. However, the culture method is necessary for monitoring emerging antimicrobial resistance and to inform gonorrhea treatment guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"8 ","pages":"167-173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/POR.S137377","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conventional culture versus nucleic acid amplification tests for screening of urethral <i>Neisseria gonorrhea</i> infection among asymptomatic men who have sex with men.\",\"authors\":\"Jiratha Budkaew,&nbsp;Bandit Chumworathayi,&nbsp;Chamsai Pientong,&nbsp;Tipaya Ekalaksananan\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/POR.S137377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many methods are used to detect urethral <i>Neisseria gonorrhea</i> (<i>NG</i>) infection among asymptomatic men who have sex with men (MSM). The objective of this study was to define the performance of conventional culture compared to real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for diagnosis of asymptomatic urethral gonorrhea among MSM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 147 clinical specimens for <i>NG</i> testing from asymptomatic participants were evaluated. MSM >18 years old who consented to undergo urethral swab and collection of urine samples from two clinics (one was the sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) mobile clinic and the second was the antiretroviral clinic) located in Khon Kaen, Thailand, were recruited. For conventional culture, 147 swab specimens from urethra were analyzed. For real-time PCR, the same samples and collected urine (147 urethral swab and 62 urine) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were predominately older aged (mean age: 28.79 years, range: 18-54), asymptomatic (99.3%), and engaged in sex with multiple partners (63% had at least two partners and 36% had at least three partners during the previous 3 months). Twenty-five MSM (17%) had history of STD, mainly human immunodeficiency virus infection. Of the 147 specimens, 42 were positive for <i>NG</i> detected by real-time PCR (prevalence: 28.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.8%-32.4%), while none of the 147 MSM were positive for <i>NG</i> detected by conventional culture (prevalence: 0.0%, 95% CI: 0.0%-7.3%). These findings indicated that conventional culture had low sensitivity but high specificity (0.0% and 100%, respectively). We could not demonstrate that many of the factors that were identified in other studies were associated to increased (or decreased) risk of urethral gonococcal infection in our population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In asymptomatic MSM, nucleic acid amplification tests are more appropriate for screening of urethral <i>NG</i> infection than conventional culture. However, the culture method is necessary for monitoring emerging antimicrobial resistance and to inform gonorrhea treatment guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatic and Observational Research\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"167-173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/POR.S137377\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatic and Observational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S137377\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S137377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:无症状男男性行为者(MSM)尿道淋病奈瑟菌(NG)感染检测方法较多。本研究的目的是确定常规培养与实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)在男男性接触者无症状尿道淋病诊断中的作用。方法:在这项横断面研究中,对147例无症状参与者的NG检测临床标本进行评估。研究招募了18岁以上的男男性行为者,他们同意在泰国孔凯的两个诊所(一个是性传播疾病流动诊所,另一个是抗逆转录病毒诊所)接受尿道拭子和尿液样本采集。常规培养147份尿道拭子标本进行分析。real-time PCR对采集的尿液(147份尿道拭子和62份尿液)进行评估。结果:参与者主要是年龄较大(平均年龄:28.79岁,范围:18-54岁),无症状(99.3%),与多个伴侣发生性行为(63%至少有两个伴侣,36%至少有三个伴侣在过去3个月内)。男男性行为者有性病史25例(17%),主要为人类免疫缺陷病毒感染。147例MSM中,实时荧光定量PCR检测NG阳性42例(阳性率28.6%,95%可信区间[CI]: 24.8% ~ 32.4%),常规培养检测NG阴性147例(阳性率0.0%,95%可信区间[CI]: 0.0% ~ 7.3%)。结果表明,常规培养敏感性低,特异性高(分别为0.0%和100%)。我们无法证明在其他研究中发现的许多因素与我们人群中尿道淋球菌感染风险的增加(或降低)有关。结论:在无症状男男性接触者中,核酸扩增试验比常规培养更适合筛查尿道NG感染。然而,培养方法对于监测新出现的抗菌素耐药性和告知淋病治疗指南是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Conventional culture versus nucleic acid amplification tests for screening of urethral <i>Neisseria gonorrhea</i> infection among asymptomatic men who have sex with men.

Conventional culture versus nucleic acid amplification tests for screening of urethral Neisseria gonorrhea infection among asymptomatic men who have sex with men.

Background: Many methods are used to detect urethral Neisseria gonorrhea (NG) infection among asymptomatic men who have sex with men (MSM). The objective of this study was to define the performance of conventional culture compared to real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for diagnosis of asymptomatic urethral gonorrhea among MSM.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 147 clinical specimens for NG testing from asymptomatic participants were evaluated. MSM >18 years old who consented to undergo urethral swab and collection of urine samples from two clinics (one was the sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) mobile clinic and the second was the antiretroviral clinic) located in Khon Kaen, Thailand, were recruited. For conventional culture, 147 swab specimens from urethra were analyzed. For real-time PCR, the same samples and collected urine (147 urethral swab and 62 urine) were evaluated.

Results: Participants were predominately older aged (mean age: 28.79 years, range: 18-54), asymptomatic (99.3%), and engaged in sex with multiple partners (63% had at least two partners and 36% had at least three partners during the previous 3 months). Twenty-five MSM (17%) had history of STD, mainly human immunodeficiency virus infection. Of the 147 specimens, 42 were positive for NG detected by real-time PCR (prevalence: 28.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.8%-32.4%), while none of the 147 MSM were positive for NG detected by conventional culture (prevalence: 0.0%, 95% CI: 0.0%-7.3%). These findings indicated that conventional culture had low sensitivity but high specificity (0.0% and 100%, respectively). We could not demonstrate that many of the factors that were identified in other studies were associated to increased (or decreased) risk of urethral gonococcal infection in our population.

Conclusion: In asymptomatic MSM, nucleic acid amplification tests are more appropriate for screening of urethral NG infection than conventional culture. However, the culture method is necessary for monitoring emerging antimicrobial resistance and to inform gonorrhea treatment guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pragmatic and Observational Research
Pragmatic and Observational Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Pragmatic and Observational Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes data from studies designed to closely reflect medical interventions in real-world clinical practice, providing insights beyond classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While RCTs maximize internal validity for cause-and-effect relationships, they often represent only specific patient groups. This journal aims to complement such studies by providing data that better mirrors real-world patients and the usage of medicines, thus informing guidelines and enhancing the applicability of research findings across diverse patient populations encountered in everyday clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信