Kyra A Knutson, Olivia A Petritz, Andrea Thomson, James Robertson, Julie A Balko
{"title":"与咪达唑仑和布托啡诺肌肉注射对罗得岛红母鸡(Gallus Gallus domestic)的影响比较。","authors":"Kyra A Knutson, Olivia A Petritz, Andrea Thomson, James Robertson, Julie A Balko","doi":"10.1647/20-00087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chickens (<i>Gallus gallus domesticus</i>) often undergo veterinary procedures requiring sedation; however, there is little published research evaluating the efficacy of sedation protocols in this species. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of intramuscular alfaxalone and midazolam compared with intramuscular butorphanol and midazolam in chickens. In a complete crossover study, 11 healthy adult hens were randomly administered midazolam 2.5 mg/kg IM combined with either alfaxalone 15 mg/kg IM (AM, n = 11) or butorphanol 3 mg/kg IM (BM, n = 11), with a 35-day washout period between groups. Time to first effects, recumbency, standing, and recovery were recorded. Physiologic parameters and sedation scores were recorded every 5 minutes by 2 blinded investigators. Fifteen minutes after injection, positioning for sham whole body radiographs was attempted. At 30 minutes, flumazenil 0.05 mg/kg IM was administered to all hens. Peak total sedation score was significantly higher for AM compared with BM (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Mean ± SD or median (range) time to initial effects, recumbency, standing, and recovery in AM and BM were 1.9 ± 0.6 and 2.6 ± 0.9 (<i>P</i> = 0.02), 3.5 (1.6-7.6) and 4.8 (2.2-13.0) (<i>P</i> = 0.10), 40.3 (28.0-77.8) and 33.2 (5.2-41.3) (<i>P</i> = 0.15), and 71.2 (45.7-202.3) and 39.9 (35.9-45.9) minutes (<i>P</i> = 0.05), respectively. Radiographic positioning was successful in 6 of 11 (54.5%) and 0 of 11 (0%) birds in the AM and BM groups at 15 minutes, respectively. Heart and respiratory rates remained within acceptable clinical limits for all birds. Intramuscular AM resulted in significantly faster onset of sedative effects, significantly longer duration of recumbency, significantly higher peak sedation, and improved success of radiographic positioning compared with intramuscular BM. Intramuscular AM produces clinically effective sedation in chickens without clinically significant cardiorespiratory effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":15102,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Intramuscular Alfaxalone and Midazolam Compared With Midazolam and Butorphanol in Rhode Island Red Hens (<i>Gallus gallus domesticus</i>).\",\"authors\":\"Kyra A Knutson, Olivia A Petritz, Andrea Thomson, James Robertson, Julie A Balko\",\"doi\":\"10.1647/20-00087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chickens (<i>Gallus gallus domesticus</i>) often undergo veterinary procedures requiring sedation; however, there is little published research evaluating the efficacy of sedation protocols in this species. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of intramuscular alfaxalone and midazolam compared with intramuscular butorphanol and midazolam in chickens. In a complete crossover study, 11 healthy adult hens were randomly administered midazolam 2.5 mg/kg IM combined with either alfaxalone 15 mg/kg IM (AM, n = 11) or butorphanol 3 mg/kg IM (BM, n = 11), with a 35-day washout period between groups. Time to first effects, recumbency, standing, and recovery were recorded. Physiologic parameters and sedation scores were recorded every 5 minutes by 2 blinded investigators. Fifteen minutes after injection, positioning for sham whole body radiographs was attempted. At 30 minutes, flumazenil 0.05 mg/kg IM was administered to all hens. Peak total sedation score was significantly higher for AM compared with BM (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Mean ± SD or median (range) time to initial effects, recumbency, standing, and recovery in AM and BM were 1.9 ± 0.6 and 2.6 ± 0.9 (<i>P</i> = 0.02), 3.5 (1.6-7.6) and 4.8 (2.2-13.0) (<i>P</i> = 0.10), 40.3 (28.0-77.8) and 33.2 (5.2-41.3) (<i>P</i> = 0.15), and 71.2 (45.7-202.3) and 39.9 (35.9-45.9) minutes (<i>P</i> = 0.05), respectively. Radiographic positioning was successful in 6 of 11 (54.5%) and 0 of 11 (0%) birds in the AM and BM groups at 15 minutes, respectively. Heart and respiratory rates remained within acceptable clinical limits for all birds. Intramuscular AM resulted in significantly faster onset of sedative effects, significantly longer duration of recumbency, significantly higher peak sedation, and improved success of radiographic positioning compared with intramuscular BM. Intramuscular AM produces clinically effective sedation in chickens without clinically significant cardiorespiratory effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1647/20-00087\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1647/20-00087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
鸡(Gallus Gallus domesticus)经常接受需要镇静的兽医程序;然而,很少有发表的研究评估镇静方案对该物种的疗效。本研究的目的是比较肌注阿法沙龙和咪达唑仑与肌注丁托啡诺和咪达唑仑对鸡的影响。在完全交叉试验中,11只健康成年母鸡随机给予咪达唑仑2.5 mg/kg IM与阿法沙龙15 mg/kg IM (AM, n = 11)或丁托啡诺3 mg/kg IM (BM, n = 11),试验期35 d。记录起效时间、平卧时间、站立时间和恢复时间。2名盲法研究人员每5分钟记录一次生理参数和镇静评分。注射后15分钟,尝试定位假全身x线片。30分钟时,所有母鸡均饲喂氟马西尼0.05 mg/kg IM。AM组的峰值总镇静评分明显高于BM组(P < 0.001)。AM和BM的平均±SD或中位(范围)时间为1.9±0.6和2.6±0.9 (P = 0.02), 3.5(1.6-7.6)和4.8 (2.2-13.0)(P = 0.10), 40.3(28.0-77.8)和33.2 (5.2-41.3)(P = 0.15), 71.2(45.7-202.3)和39.9(35.9-45.9)分钟(P = 0.05)。在15分钟内,AM组和BM组分别有6 / 11(54.5%)和0 / 11(0%)成功定位。所有鸟类的心率和呼吸率均在可接受的临床限度内。与肌注AM相比,肌注AM可显著加快镇静作用的起效,显著延长平卧时间,显著提高镇静峰值,并提高x线片定位的成功率。肌注AM对鸡产生临床有效的镇静作用,但无明显的心肺作用。
Effects of Intramuscular Alfaxalone and Midazolam Compared With Midazolam and Butorphanol in Rhode Island Red Hens (Gallus gallus domesticus).
Chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) often undergo veterinary procedures requiring sedation; however, there is little published research evaluating the efficacy of sedation protocols in this species. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of intramuscular alfaxalone and midazolam compared with intramuscular butorphanol and midazolam in chickens. In a complete crossover study, 11 healthy adult hens were randomly administered midazolam 2.5 mg/kg IM combined with either alfaxalone 15 mg/kg IM (AM, n = 11) or butorphanol 3 mg/kg IM (BM, n = 11), with a 35-day washout period between groups. Time to first effects, recumbency, standing, and recovery were recorded. Physiologic parameters and sedation scores were recorded every 5 minutes by 2 blinded investigators. Fifteen minutes after injection, positioning for sham whole body radiographs was attempted. At 30 minutes, flumazenil 0.05 mg/kg IM was administered to all hens. Peak total sedation score was significantly higher for AM compared with BM (P < 0.001). Mean ± SD or median (range) time to initial effects, recumbency, standing, and recovery in AM and BM were 1.9 ± 0.6 and 2.6 ± 0.9 (P = 0.02), 3.5 (1.6-7.6) and 4.8 (2.2-13.0) (P = 0.10), 40.3 (28.0-77.8) and 33.2 (5.2-41.3) (P = 0.15), and 71.2 (45.7-202.3) and 39.9 (35.9-45.9) minutes (P = 0.05), respectively. Radiographic positioning was successful in 6 of 11 (54.5%) and 0 of 11 (0%) birds in the AM and BM groups at 15 minutes, respectively. Heart and respiratory rates remained within acceptable clinical limits for all birds. Intramuscular AM resulted in significantly faster onset of sedative effects, significantly longer duration of recumbency, significantly higher peak sedation, and improved success of radiographic positioning compared with intramuscular BM. Intramuscular AM produces clinically effective sedation in chickens without clinically significant cardiorespiratory effects.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery is an international journal of the medicine and surgery of both captive and wild birds. Published materials include scientific articles, case reports, editorials, abstracts, new research, and book reviews.