元研究指标很重要:关于文章“去四苯那嗪和四苯那嗪治疗亨廷顿病的间接耐受性比较”的信。

Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders Pub Date : 2017-11-22 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40734-017-0067-x
Filipe B Rodrigues, Gonçalo S Duarte, João Costa, Joaquim J Ferreira, Edward J Wild
{"title":"元研究指标很重要:关于文章“去四苯那嗪和四苯那嗪治疗亨廷顿病的间接耐受性比较”的信。","authors":"Filipe B Rodrigues,&nbsp;Gonçalo S Duarte,&nbsp;João Costa,&nbsp;Joaquim J Ferreira,&nbsp;Edward J Wild","doi":"10.1186/s40734-017-0067-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Here we discuss the report by Claassen and colleagues describing an indirect treatment comparison between tetrabenazine and deutetrabenazine for chorea in Huntington's disease using individual patient data. We note the potential for discrepancies in apparently statistically significant findings, due to the rank reversal phenomenon. We provide some cautionary observations and suggestions concerning the limitations of indirect comparisons and the low likelihood that good quality evidence will become available to guide clinical decision comparing these two agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":15374,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders","volume":"4 ","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40734-017-0067-x","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-research metrics matter: letter regarding article \\\"indirect tolerability comparison of Deutetrabenazine and Tetrabenazine for Huntington disease\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Filipe B Rodrigues,&nbsp;Gonçalo S Duarte,&nbsp;João Costa,&nbsp;Joaquim J Ferreira,&nbsp;Edward J Wild\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40734-017-0067-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Here we discuss the report by Claassen and colleagues describing an indirect treatment comparison between tetrabenazine and deutetrabenazine for chorea in Huntington's disease using individual patient data. We note the potential for discrepancies in apparently statistically significant findings, due to the rank reversal phenomenon. We provide some cautionary observations and suggestions concerning the limitations of indirect comparisons and the low likelihood that good quality evidence will become available to guide clinical decision comparing these two agents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40734-017-0067-x\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40734-017-0067-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40734-017-0067-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

在此,我们讨论了Claassen及其同事的报告,该报告描述了四苯那嗪和去四苯那嗪对亨廷顿舞蹈病舞蹈病的间接治疗比较,使用了个体患者的数据。我们注意到,由于秩反转现象,在明显的统计显著性发现中存在差异的可能性。我们就间接比较的局限性和获得高质量证据来指导比较这两种药物的临床决策的可能性较低提供了一些谨慎的观察和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meta-research metrics matter: letter regarding article "indirect tolerability comparison of Deutetrabenazine and Tetrabenazine for Huntington disease".

Here we discuss the report by Claassen and colleagues describing an indirect treatment comparison between tetrabenazine and deutetrabenazine for chorea in Huntington's disease using individual patient data. We note the potential for discrepancies in apparently statistically significant findings, due to the rank reversal phenomenon. We provide some cautionary observations and suggestions concerning the limitations of indirect comparisons and the low likelihood that good quality evidence will become available to guide clinical decision comparing these two agents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信