痉挛对中风后安静站立时平衡控制的影响。

IF 1.8 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Stroke Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-09-14 DOI:10.1155/2017/6153714
Reza Rahimzadeh Khiabani, George Mochizuki, Farooq Ismail, Chris Boulias, Chetan P Phadke, William H Gage
{"title":"痉挛对中风后安静站立时平衡控制的影响。","authors":"Reza Rahimzadeh Khiabani,&nbsp;George Mochizuki,&nbsp;Farooq Ismail,&nbsp;Chris Boulias,&nbsp;Chetan P Phadke,&nbsp;William H Gage","doi":"10.1155/2017/6153714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Balance impairments, falls, and spasticity are common after stroke, but the effect of spasticity on balance control after stroke is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, twenty-seven participants with stroke were divided into two groups, based on ankle plantar flexor spasticity level. Fifteen individuals with high spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of ≥2) and 12 individuals with low spasticity (MAS score <2) completed quiet standing trials with eyes open and closed conditions. Balance control measures included centre of pressure (COP) root mean square (RMS), COP velocity, and COP mean power frequency (MPF) in anterior-posterior and mediolateral (ML) directions. Trunk sway was estimated using a wearable inertial measurement unit to measure trunk angle, trunk velocity, and trunk velocity frequency amplitude in pitch and roll directions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The high spasticity group demonstrated greater ML COP velocity, trunk roll velocity, trunk roll velocity frequency amplitude at 3.7 Hz, and trunk roll velocity frequency amplitude at 4.9 Hz, particularly in the eyes closed condition (<i>spasticity</i> by <i>vision</i> interaction). ML COP MPF was greater in the high spasticity group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals with high spasticity after stroke demonstrated greater impairment of balance control in the frontal plane, which was exacerbated when vision was removed.</p>","PeriodicalId":22054,"journal":{"name":"Stroke Research and Treatment","volume":"2017 ","pages":"6153714"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/6153714","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Spasticity on Balance Control during Quiet Standing in Persons after Stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Reza Rahimzadeh Khiabani,&nbsp;George Mochizuki,&nbsp;Farooq Ismail,&nbsp;Chris Boulias,&nbsp;Chetan P Phadke,&nbsp;William H Gage\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2017/6153714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Balance impairments, falls, and spasticity are common after stroke, but the effect of spasticity on balance control after stroke is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, twenty-seven participants with stroke were divided into two groups, based on ankle plantar flexor spasticity level. Fifteen individuals with high spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of ≥2) and 12 individuals with low spasticity (MAS score <2) completed quiet standing trials with eyes open and closed conditions. Balance control measures included centre of pressure (COP) root mean square (RMS), COP velocity, and COP mean power frequency (MPF) in anterior-posterior and mediolateral (ML) directions. Trunk sway was estimated using a wearable inertial measurement unit to measure trunk angle, trunk velocity, and trunk velocity frequency amplitude in pitch and roll directions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The high spasticity group demonstrated greater ML COP velocity, trunk roll velocity, trunk roll velocity frequency amplitude at 3.7 Hz, and trunk roll velocity frequency amplitude at 4.9 Hz, particularly in the eyes closed condition (<i>spasticity</i> by <i>vision</i> interaction). ML COP MPF was greater in the high spasticity group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals with high spasticity after stroke demonstrated greater impairment of balance control in the frontal plane, which was exacerbated when vision was removed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\"2017 \",\"pages\":\"6153714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/6153714\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6153714\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/9/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6153714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

背景:平衡障碍、跌倒和痉挛是卒中后常见的,但痉挛对卒中后平衡控制的影响尚不清楚。方法:在横断面研究中,27例卒中患者根据踝关节足底屈肌痉挛程度分为两组。高痉挛组15例(修正Ashworth量表(MAS)评分≥2),低痉挛组12例(MAS评分)结果:高痉挛组表现出更大的ML COP速度、躯干翻滚速度、躯干翻滚速度频率幅值3.7 Hz和躯干翻滚速度频率幅值4.9 Hz,特别是在闭眼状态下(视觉相互作用引起的痉挛)。高痉挛组ML COP MPF更大。结论:脑卒中后高度痉挛患者额叶平衡控制功能受损更严重,视力丧失后这种情况加重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Spasticity on Balance Control during Quiet Standing in Persons after Stroke.

Background: Balance impairments, falls, and spasticity are common after stroke, but the effect of spasticity on balance control after stroke is not well understood.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, twenty-seven participants with stroke were divided into two groups, based on ankle plantar flexor spasticity level. Fifteen individuals with high spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of ≥2) and 12 individuals with low spasticity (MAS score <2) completed quiet standing trials with eyes open and closed conditions. Balance control measures included centre of pressure (COP) root mean square (RMS), COP velocity, and COP mean power frequency (MPF) in anterior-posterior and mediolateral (ML) directions. Trunk sway was estimated using a wearable inertial measurement unit to measure trunk angle, trunk velocity, and trunk velocity frequency amplitude in pitch and roll directions.

Results: The high spasticity group demonstrated greater ML COP velocity, trunk roll velocity, trunk roll velocity frequency amplitude at 3.7 Hz, and trunk roll velocity frequency amplitude at 4.9 Hz, particularly in the eyes closed condition (spasticity by vision interaction). ML COP MPF was greater in the high spasticity group.

Conclusion: Individuals with high spasticity after stroke demonstrated greater impairment of balance control in the frontal plane, which was exacerbated when vision was removed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke Research and Treatment
Stroke Research and Treatment PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信