Jean Gibb, Jimmy Chitsulo, Chifundo Chipungu, Mackenzie Chivwara, Alan Schooley, Risa M Hoffman
{"title":"支持质量数据系统:马拉维利隆圭一家大型诊所早期实施常规病毒载量监测的经验教训。","authors":"Jean Gibb, Jimmy Chitsulo, Chifundo Chipungu, Mackenzie Chivwara, Alan Schooley, Risa M Hoffman","doi":"10.14302/issn.2324-7339.jcrhap-17-1468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Successful viral load programs rely on the presence of data systems and high quality of patient data. Using a cohort of 49 patients at Partners in Hope, a large, urban HIV clinic in Malawi, we performed a quality improvement assessment of a new viral load program with a focus on accuracy of data collected from patients as well as adherence to Malawi HIV Guidelines in regard to response to elevated viral loads (≥1,000 copies/mL). Data were obtained from three parallel medical record systems to investigate the proportion of patients with a repeat viral load and whether the three data systems agreed in regard to sociodemographic and clinical data. Fewer than 30% of patients had a repeat viral load within six months, as recommended in the Malawi HIV Guidelines. There were significant problems with data agreement across the three parallel databases used for care. Date of birth was consistent for 55.1% (N=27) of patients, while a different date of birth was noted in all three sources for 10.2% of pateints (N=1). For 65.3% (N=32), the viral load from the laboratory did not match the recorded viral load in the electronic or paper record. Scale-up of viral load monitoring must be accompanied by the development of data systems that support workflow from sample collection to lab and back to provider. Education of providers and strategies for data collection with minimal errors can facilitate scale-up of high quality programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":90584,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical research in HIV AIDS and prevention","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502771/pdf/nihms869857.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting Quality Data Systems: Lessons Learned from Early Implementation of Routine Viral Load Monitoring at a Large Clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi.\",\"authors\":\"Jean Gibb, Jimmy Chitsulo, Chifundo Chipungu, Mackenzie Chivwara, Alan Schooley, Risa M Hoffman\",\"doi\":\"10.14302/issn.2324-7339.jcrhap-17-1468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Successful viral load programs rely on the presence of data systems and high quality of patient data. Using a cohort of 49 patients at Partners in Hope, a large, urban HIV clinic in Malawi, we performed a quality improvement assessment of a new viral load program with a focus on accuracy of data collected from patients as well as adherence to Malawi HIV Guidelines in regard to response to elevated viral loads (≥1,000 copies/mL). Data were obtained from three parallel medical record systems to investigate the proportion of patients with a repeat viral load and whether the three data systems agreed in regard to sociodemographic and clinical data. Fewer than 30% of patients had a repeat viral load within six months, as recommended in the Malawi HIV Guidelines. There were significant problems with data agreement across the three parallel databases used for care. Date of birth was consistent for 55.1% (N=27) of patients, while a different date of birth was noted in all three sources for 10.2% of pateints (N=1). For 65.3% (N=32), the viral load from the laboratory did not match the recorded viral load in the electronic or paper record. Scale-up of viral load monitoring must be accompanied by the development of data systems that support workflow from sample collection to lab and back to provider. Education of providers and strategies for data collection with minimal errors can facilitate scale-up of high quality programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical research in HIV AIDS and prevention\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502771/pdf/nihms869857.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical research in HIV AIDS and prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2324-7339.jcrhap-17-1468\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/3/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical research in HIV AIDS and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2324-7339.jcrhap-17-1468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
成功的病毒载量计划依赖于数据系统的存在和高质量的患者数据。我们在马拉维的一家大型城市HIV诊所“希望伙伴”(Partners in Hope)对49名患者进行了队列研究,对一项新的病毒载量计划进行了质量改进评估,重点关注从患者收集的数据的准确性,以及对马拉维HIV指南关于病毒载量升高(≥1000拷贝/mL)的反应的依从性。数据来自三个平行的医疗记录系统,以调查重复病毒载量患者的比例,以及三个数据系统在社会人口统计学和临床数据方面是否一致。根据《马拉维艾滋病毒指南》的建议,不到30%的患者在6个月内出现重复病毒载量。用于护理的三个并行数据库的数据一致性存在显著问题。55.1% (N=27)患者的出生日期一致,10.2% (N=1)患者的出生日期在所有三个来源中都不同。65.3% (N=32)的实验室病毒载量与电子或纸质记录中记录的病毒载量不匹配。病毒载量监测的扩大必须伴随着数据系统的发展,支持从样本收集到实验室和返回到供应商的工作流程。对提供者的教育和以最小错误收集数据的策略可以促进高质量计划的扩大。
Supporting Quality Data Systems: Lessons Learned from Early Implementation of Routine Viral Load Monitoring at a Large Clinic in Lilongwe, Malawi.
Successful viral load programs rely on the presence of data systems and high quality of patient data. Using a cohort of 49 patients at Partners in Hope, a large, urban HIV clinic in Malawi, we performed a quality improvement assessment of a new viral load program with a focus on accuracy of data collected from patients as well as adherence to Malawi HIV Guidelines in regard to response to elevated viral loads (≥1,000 copies/mL). Data were obtained from three parallel medical record systems to investigate the proportion of patients with a repeat viral load and whether the three data systems agreed in regard to sociodemographic and clinical data. Fewer than 30% of patients had a repeat viral load within six months, as recommended in the Malawi HIV Guidelines. There were significant problems with data agreement across the three parallel databases used for care. Date of birth was consistent for 55.1% (N=27) of patients, while a different date of birth was noted in all three sources for 10.2% of pateints (N=1). For 65.3% (N=32), the viral load from the laboratory did not match the recorded viral load in the electronic or paper record. Scale-up of viral load monitoring must be accompanied by the development of data systems that support workflow from sample collection to lab and back to provider. Education of providers and strategies for data collection with minimal errors can facilitate scale-up of high quality programs.