补充益生菌对 2-5 岁儿童乳酸菌、双歧杆菌和短链脂肪酸总量的影响

Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease Pub Date : 2017-03-10 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1080/16512235.2017.1298340
R Hemalatha, A C Ouwehand, M T Saarinen, U V Prasad, K Swetha, V Bhaskar
{"title":"补充益生菌对 2-5 岁儿童乳酸菌、双歧杆菌和短链脂肪酸总量的影响","authors":"R Hemalatha, A C Ouwehand, M T Saarinen, U V Prasad, K Swetha, V Bhaskar","doi":"10.1080/16512235.2017.1298340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>​<b>Background</b>: Consumption of <i>Lactobacillus paracasei</i> Lpc-37 or <i>Bifidobacterium lactis</i> HN019 by 2-5-year-old children was found to reduce risk for diarrhoea and fever during the rainy season. <b>Objective</b>: Can changes in faecal short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) or branched chain fatty acids (BCFAs) explain the observed positive influence of probiotics and their role on nutritional status and diarrhoea risk? <b>Design</b>: Faecal samples were analysed for SCFAs and BCFAs and correlated to <i>Bifidobacterium</i> and <i>Lactobacillus</i> levels; both at the start and after nine months' consumption of either of the two probiotic strains, or placebo. <b>Results</b>: No differences in SCFAs, BCFAs, <i>Lactobacillus</i> or <i>Bifidobacterium</i> levels were found between boys and girls. Severely underweight children were observed to have the highest <i>Lactobacillus</i> levels. Probiotic intervention was found to be associated with higher levels of selected SCFAs and BCFAs in subjects who had experienced diarrhoea. Treatment with either of the probiotics led to changes in SCFAs and BCFAs. SCFAs, acetate, propionate and butyrate, were found to correlate with each other. Likewise, BCFAs isobutyrate, 2-methylbutyrate and isovalerate correlated with each other. After the intervention, <i>L. paracasei</i> Lpc-37 correlated positively with total <i>Bifidobacterium</i> counts and isovalerate levels. <i>B. lactis</i> HN019 counts were found to correlate positively with total bacterial counts and negatively with propionate levels. <b>Conclusions</b>: ​Nutritional status was associated with higher levels of faecal lactobacilli; the meaning of this requires further investigation. The intervention with the two probiotics was observed to influence the levels of faecal SCFAs and BCFAs and there is a differential response in those who developed diarrhoea and those who did not. It is, however, not clear to what extent this is a mechanism that explains the earlier observed effect the strains had on diarrhoea risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":18568,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease","volume":"28 1","pages":"1298340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5443088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of probiotic supplementation on total lactobacilli, bifidobacteria and short chain fatty acids in 2-5-year-old children.\",\"authors\":\"R Hemalatha, A C Ouwehand, M T Saarinen, U V Prasad, K Swetha, V Bhaskar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16512235.2017.1298340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>​<b>Background</b>: Consumption of <i>Lactobacillus paracasei</i> Lpc-37 or <i>Bifidobacterium lactis</i> HN019 by 2-5-year-old children was found to reduce risk for diarrhoea and fever during the rainy season. <b>Objective</b>: Can changes in faecal short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) or branched chain fatty acids (BCFAs) explain the observed positive influence of probiotics and their role on nutritional status and diarrhoea risk? <b>Design</b>: Faecal samples were analysed for SCFAs and BCFAs and correlated to <i>Bifidobacterium</i> and <i>Lactobacillus</i> levels; both at the start and after nine months' consumption of either of the two probiotic strains, or placebo. <b>Results</b>: No differences in SCFAs, BCFAs, <i>Lactobacillus</i> or <i>Bifidobacterium</i> levels were found between boys and girls. Severely underweight children were observed to have the highest <i>Lactobacillus</i> levels. Probiotic intervention was found to be associated with higher levels of selected SCFAs and BCFAs in subjects who had experienced diarrhoea. Treatment with either of the probiotics led to changes in SCFAs and BCFAs. SCFAs, acetate, propionate and butyrate, were found to correlate with each other. Likewise, BCFAs isobutyrate, 2-methylbutyrate and isovalerate correlated with each other. After the intervention, <i>L. paracasei</i> Lpc-37 correlated positively with total <i>Bifidobacterium</i> counts and isovalerate levels. <i>B. lactis</i> HN019 counts were found to correlate positively with total bacterial counts and negatively with propionate levels. <b>Conclusions</b>: ​Nutritional status was associated with higher levels of faecal lactobacilli; the meaning of this requires further investigation. The intervention with the two probiotics was observed to influence the levels of faecal SCFAs and BCFAs and there is a differential response in those who developed diarrhoea and those who did not. It is, however, not clear to what extent this is a mechanism that explains the earlier observed effect the strains had on diarrhoea risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"1298340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5443088/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16512235.2017.1298340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16512235.2017.1298340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究发现,2-5 岁儿童食用副干酪乳杆菌 Lpc-37 或乳双歧杆菌 HN019 可降低雨季腹泻和发烧的风险。目的粪便中短链脂肪酸(SCFAs)或支链脂肪酸(BCFAs)的变化能否解释所观察到的益生菌的积极影响及其对营养状况和腹泻风险的作用?设计:对粪便样本中的 SCFAs 和 BCFAs 进行分析,并将其与双歧杆菌和乳酸杆菌的水平联系起来;在开始时和服用两种益生菌菌株或安慰剂九个月后均进行分析。结果显示男孩和女孩的 SCFAs、BCFAs、乳酸杆菌或双歧杆菌水平没有差异。据观察,严重体重不足儿童的乳酸杆菌含量最高。研究发现,益生菌干预与腹泻受试者体内某些 SCFAs 和 BCFAs 含量较高有关。任何一种益生菌的治疗都会导致 SCFAs 和 BCFAs 的变化。研究发现,SCFAs、乙酸盐、丙酸盐和丁酸盐相互关联。同样,BCFAs 异丁酸酯、2-甲基丁酸酯和异戊酸酯也相互关联。干预后,副杆菌 Lpc-37 与双歧杆菌总数和异戊酸水平呈正相关。乳酸杆菌 HN019 的数量与细菌总数呈正相关,而与丙酸水平呈负相关。结论营养状况与较高的粪便乳酸菌水平有关;其意义需要进一步研究。据观察,两种益生菌的干预会影响粪便中 SCFAs 和 BCFAs 的水平,而且出现腹泻的人和未出现腹泻的人的反应不同。不过,目前还不清楚这在多大程度上是一种机制,可以解释之前观察到的菌株对腹泻风险的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of probiotic supplementation on total lactobacilli, bifidobacteria and short chain fatty acids in 2-5-year-old children.

Effect of probiotic supplementation on total lactobacilli, bifidobacteria and short chain fatty acids in 2-5-year-old children.

Background: Consumption of Lactobacillus paracasei Lpc-37 or Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 by 2-5-year-old children was found to reduce risk for diarrhoea and fever during the rainy season. Objective: Can changes in faecal short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) or branched chain fatty acids (BCFAs) explain the observed positive influence of probiotics and their role on nutritional status and diarrhoea risk? Design: Faecal samples were analysed for SCFAs and BCFAs and correlated to Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus levels; both at the start and after nine months' consumption of either of the two probiotic strains, or placebo. Results: No differences in SCFAs, BCFAs, Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium levels were found between boys and girls. Severely underweight children were observed to have the highest Lactobacillus levels. Probiotic intervention was found to be associated with higher levels of selected SCFAs and BCFAs in subjects who had experienced diarrhoea. Treatment with either of the probiotics led to changes in SCFAs and BCFAs. SCFAs, acetate, propionate and butyrate, were found to correlate with each other. Likewise, BCFAs isobutyrate, 2-methylbutyrate and isovalerate correlated with each other. After the intervention, L. paracasei Lpc-37 correlated positively with total Bifidobacterium counts and isovalerate levels. B. lactis HN019 counts were found to correlate positively with total bacterial counts and negatively with propionate levels. Conclusions: ​Nutritional status was associated with higher levels of faecal lactobacilli; the meaning of this requires further investigation. The intervention with the two probiotics was observed to influence the levels of faecal SCFAs and BCFAs and there is a differential response in those who developed diarrhoea and those who did not. It is, however, not clear to what extent this is a mechanism that explains the earlier observed effect the strains had on diarrhoea risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信