根据需要有针对性地投放杀菌剂。

IF 9.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Annual review of phytopathology Pub Date : 2017-08-04 Epub Date: 2017-05-19 DOI:10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035357
Lise N Jørgensen, F van den Bosch, R P Oliver, T M Heick, N D Paveley
{"title":"根据需要有针对性地投放杀菌剂。","authors":"Lise N Jørgensen,&nbsp;F van den Bosch,&nbsp;R P Oliver,&nbsp;T M Heick,&nbsp;N D Paveley","doi":"10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fungicides should be used to the extent required to minimize economic costs of disease in a given field in a given season. The maximum number of treatments and maximum dose per treatment are set by fungicide manufacturers and regulators at a level that provides effective control under high disease pressure. Lower doses are economically optimal under low or moderate disease pressure, or where other control measures such as resistant cultivars constrain epidemics. Farmers in many countries often apply reduced doses, although they may still apply higher doses than the optimum to insure against losses in high disease seasons. Evidence supports reducing the number of treatments and reducing the applied dose to slow the evolution of fungicide resistance. The continuing research challenge is to improve prediction of future disease damage and account for the combined effect of integrated control measures to estimate the optimum number of treatments and the optimum dose needed to minimize economic costs. The theory for optimizing dose is well developed but requires translation into decision tools because the current basis for farmers' dose decisions is unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":8251,"journal":{"name":"Annual review of phytopathology","volume":"55 ","pages":"181-203"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035357","citationCount":"65","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Targeting Fungicide Inputs According to Need.\",\"authors\":\"Lise N Jørgensen,&nbsp;F van den Bosch,&nbsp;R P Oliver,&nbsp;T M Heick,&nbsp;N D Paveley\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Fungicides should be used to the extent required to minimize economic costs of disease in a given field in a given season. The maximum number of treatments and maximum dose per treatment are set by fungicide manufacturers and regulators at a level that provides effective control under high disease pressure. Lower doses are economically optimal under low or moderate disease pressure, or where other control measures such as resistant cultivars constrain epidemics. Farmers in many countries often apply reduced doses, although they may still apply higher doses than the optimum to insure against losses in high disease seasons. Evidence supports reducing the number of treatments and reducing the applied dose to slow the evolution of fungicide resistance. The continuing research challenge is to improve prediction of future disease damage and account for the combined effect of integrated control measures to estimate the optimum number of treatments and the optimum dose needed to minimize economic costs. The theory for optimizing dose is well developed but requires translation into decision tools because the current basis for farmers' dose decisions is unclear.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual review of phytopathology\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"181-203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035357\",\"citationCount\":\"65\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual review of phytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035357\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/5/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual review of phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035357","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

摘要

杀菌剂的使用应尽量减少某一特定季节某一特定田地的病害经济成本。最大处理次数和每次处理的最大剂量由杀菌剂制造商和监管机构确定,其水平可在高疾病压力下提供有效控制。在低或中等疾病压力下,或在抗病品种等其他控制措施抑制流行病的情况下,较低剂量在经济上是最佳的。许多国家的农民经常减少施用剂量,尽管他们可能仍然施用高于最佳剂量的剂量,以确保在高发季节免受损失。证据支持减少处理次数和减少施用剂量,以减缓杀菌剂耐药性的演变。持续的研究挑战是改进对未来疾病损害的预测,并考虑综合控制措施的综合效果,以估计最大限度降低经济成本所需的最佳治疗次数和最佳剂量。优化剂量的理论发展得很好,但需要转化为决策工具,因为目前农民决定剂量的基础尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Targeting Fungicide Inputs According to Need.

Fungicides should be used to the extent required to minimize economic costs of disease in a given field in a given season. The maximum number of treatments and maximum dose per treatment are set by fungicide manufacturers and regulators at a level that provides effective control under high disease pressure. Lower doses are economically optimal under low or moderate disease pressure, or where other control measures such as resistant cultivars constrain epidemics. Farmers in many countries often apply reduced doses, although they may still apply higher doses than the optimum to insure against losses in high disease seasons. Evidence supports reducing the number of treatments and reducing the applied dose to slow the evolution of fungicide resistance. The continuing research challenge is to improve prediction of future disease damage and account for the combined effect of integrated control measures to estimate the optimum number of treatments and the optimum dose needed to minimize economic costs. The theory for optimizing dose is well developed but requires translation into decision tools because the current basis for farmers' dose decisions is unclear.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annual review of phytopathology
Annual review of phytopathology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
1.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Phytopathology, established in 1963, covers major advancements in plant pathology, including plant disease diagnosis, pathogens, host-pathogen Interactions, epidemiology and ecology, breeding for resistance and plant disease management, and includes a special section on the development of concepts. The journal is now open access through Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open program, with articles published under a CC BY license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信