{"title":"两种共生藻类光合碳向海葵转移的研究。","authors":"H P Engebretson, G Muller-Parker","doi":"10.2307/1542998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The intertidal sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima contains two symbiotic algae, zoochlorellae and zooxanthellae, in the Northern Puget Sound region. Possible nutritional advantages to hosting one algal symbiont over the other were explored by comparing the photosynthetic and carbon translocation rates of both symbionts under different environmental conditions. Each alga translocated 30% of photosynthetically fixed carbon in freshly collected anemones, although zoochlorellae fixed and translocated less carbon than zooxanthellae. The total amount of carbon translocated to the host was equivalent because densities of zoochlorellae were two to three times greater than were densities of zooxanthellae. In A. elegantissima maintained under high and low irradiance (100 and 10 {mu}mol photons/m2/s) at 20{deg}C and 13{deg}C for 21 days, both algae fixed and translocated carbon at greater rates at 20{deg}C (translocation rates: 0.38 pg C /zoochlorella/h; 1.12 pg C /zooxanthella/h) than at 13{deg}C (translocation rates: 0.06 pg C /zoochlorella/h; 0.37 pg C /zooxanthella/h). However, zoochlorellate anemones received 3.5 times less carbon at 20{deg}C than at 13{deg}C because the higher temperature caused a significant reduction in the density of zoochlorellae. Environmental variables, like temperature, that influence the densities of the two symbionts will affect their relative nutritional contribution to the host. Whether these differences in carbon translocation rates of the two algal symbionts affect the ecology of their anemone host awaits further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":153307,"journal":{"name":"The Biological bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"72-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1542998","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translocation of Photosynthetic Carbon From Two Algal Symbionts to the Sea Anemone Anthopleura elegantissima.\",\"authors\":\"H P Engebretson, G Muller-Parker\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1542998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The intertidal sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima contains two symbiotic algae, zoochlorellae and zooxanthellae, in the Northern Puget Sound region. Possible nutritional advantages to hosting one algal symbiont over the other were explored by comparing the photosynthetic and carbon translocation rates of both symbionts under different environmental conditions. Each alga translocated 30% of photosynthetically fixed carbon in freshly collected anemones, although zoochlorellae fixed and translocated less carbon than zooxanthellae. The total amount of carbon translocated to the host was equivalent because densities of zoochlorellae were two to three times greater than were densities of zooxanthellae. In A. elegantissima maintained under high and low irradiance (100 and 10 {mu}mol photons/m2/s) at 20{deg}C and 13{deg}C for 21 days, both algae fixed and translocated carbon at greater rates at 20{deg}C (translocation rates: 0.38 pg C /zoochlorella/h; 1.12 pg C /zooxanthella/h) than at 13{deg}C (translocation rates: 0.06 pg C /zoochlorella/h; 0.37 pg C /zooxanthella/h). However, zoochlorellate anemones received 3.5 times less carbon at 20{deg}C than at 13{deg}C because the higher temperature caused a significant reduction in the density of zoochlorellae. Environmental variables, like temperature, that influence the densities of the two symbionts will affect their relative nutritional contribution to the host. Whether these differences in carbon translocation rates of the two algal symbionts affect the ecology of their anemone host awaits further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":153307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Biological bulletin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"72-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1542998\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Biological bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1542998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Biological bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1542998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39
摘要
在普吉特海湾北部地区,潮间带海葵Anthopleura elegantissima含有两种共生藻类,小球藻和虫黄藻。通过比较两种共生体在不同环境条件下的光合作用和碳转运速率,探讨了一种共生体比另一种共生体可能具有的营养优势。每种藻类在新鲜收集的海葵中转运30%的光合固定碳,尽管小球藻比虫黄藻固定和转运的碳少。由于小球藻的密度是虫黄藻密度的两到三倍,因此向寄主转移的碳总量是相等的。在20℃和13℃的高、低辐射(100和10 {mu}mol光子/m2/s)下维持21天的A. elegantissima中,藻类在20℃下固定和转运碳的速率都更高(转运速率:0.38 pg C /zoochlorella/h;1.12 pg C /虫黄藻/h)比13{℃}C时(易位率:0.06 pg C /虫黄藻/h;0.37 pg C /虫黄菌/h)。然而,绿藻海葵在20°C时吸收的碳比在13°C时少3.5倍,因为较高的温度导致绿藻的密度显著降低。影响两种共生体密度的环境变量,如温度,将影响它们对宿主的相对营养贡献。这两种藻类共生体碳转运速率的差异是否会影响其海葵宿主的生态,还有待进一步研究。
Translocation of Photosynthetic Carbon From Two Algal Symbionts to the Sea Anemone Anthopleura elegantissima.
The intertidal sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima contains two symbiotic algae, zoochlorellae and zooxanthellae, in the Northern Puget Sound region. Possible nutritional advantages to hosting one algal symbiont over the other were explored by comparing the photosynthetic and carbon translocation rates of both symbionts under different environmental conditions. Each alga translocated 30% of photosynthetically fixed carbon in freshly collected anemones, although zoochlorellae fixed and translocated less carbon than zooxanthellae. The total amount of carbon translocated to the host was equivalent because densities of zoochlorellae were two to three times greater than were densities of zooxanthellae. In A. elegantissima maintained under high and low irradiance (100 and 10 {mu}mol photons/m2/s) at 20{deg}C and 13{deg}C for 21 days, both algae fixed and translocated carbon at greater rates at 20{deg}C (translocation rates: 0.38 pg C /zoochlorella/h; 1.12 pg C /zooxanthella/h) than at 13{deg}C (translocation rates: 0.06 pg C /zoochlorella/h; 0.37 pg C /zooxanthella/h). However, zoochlorellate anemones received 3.5 times less carbon at 20{deg}C than at 13{deg}C because the higher temperature caused a significant reduction in the density of zoochlorellae. Environmental variables, like temperature, that influence the densities of the two symbionts will affect their relative nutritional contribution to the host. Whether these differences in carbon translocation rates of the two algal symbionts affect the ecology of their anemone host awaits further investigation.