免疫和检查点抑制对阿莫地喹所致肝损伤的影响。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Alastair Mak, Alexander Johnston, Jack Uetrecht
{"title":"免疫和检查点抑制对阿莫地喹所致肝损伤的影响。","authors":"Alastair Mak,&nbsp;Alexander Johnston,&nbsp;Jack Uetrecht","doi":"10.1080/1547691X.2017.1290716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>If idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is immune-mediated, it is possible that an individual's prior exposure to antigens may affect their susceptibility to IDILI. An individual's repertoire of memory immune cells is shaped by every past exposure to antigens. Subsequent drug-induced adverse drug reactions may therefore involve an immune cell's cross reactivity between a prior antigen and resulting drug-modified proteins. Therefore in this experiment, mice were immunized with amodiaquine (AQ)-modified hepatic proteins to mimic a previous exposure; treated with a RIBI adjuvant and anti-CD40 antibodies to stimulate an immune response; and, treated with anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies prior to AQ treatment in order to overcome immune tolerance. This treatment led to greater liver injury than treatment with AQ alone. However, the mice did not develop serious liver injury. PD1<sup>-/-</sup> mice were then immunized and treated with AQ and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies so that immune tolerance would be impaired, both during immunization and also during AQ treatment. However, even this did not result in liver failure, and the liver injury was not significantly increased relative to un-immunized PD1<sup>-/-</sup> mice treated with anti-CTLA-4 and AQ. From these results we conclude that, although previous antigen exposure may affect the risk of IDILI, it appears that a very strong stimulus is required, and impairing immune tolerance remains the most effective method for producing an animal model of IDILI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunotoxicology","volume":"14 1","pages":"89-94"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1547691X.2017.1290716","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of immunization and checkpoint inhibition on amodiaquine-induced liver injury.\",\"authors\":\"Alastair Mak,&nbsp;Alexander Johnston,&nbsp;Jack Uetrecht\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1547691X.2017.1290716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>If idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is immune-mediated, it is possible that an individual's prior exposure to antigens may affect their susceptibility to IDILI. An individual's repertoire of memory immune cells is shaped by every past exposure to antigens. Subsequent drug-induced adverse drug reactions may therefore involve an immune cell's cross reactivity between a prior antigen and resulting drug-modified proteins. Therefore in this experiment, mice were immunized with amodiaquine (AQ)-modified hepatic proteins to mimic a previous exposure; treated with a RIBI adjuvant and anti-CD40 antibodies to stimulate an immune response; and, treated with anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies prior to AQ treatment in order to overcome immune tolerance. This treatment led to greater liver injury than treatment with AQ alone. However, the mice did not develop serious liver injury. PD1<sup>-/-</sup> mice were then immunized and treated with AQ and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies so that immune tolerance would be impaired, both during immunization and also during AQ treatment. However, even this did not result in liver failure, and the liver injury was not significantly increased relative to un-immunized PD1<sup>-/-</sup> mice treated with anti-CTLA-4 and AQ. From these results we conclude that, although previous antigen exposure may affect the risk of IDILI, it appears that a very strong stimulus is required, and impairing immune tolerance remains the most effective method for producing an animal model of IDILI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Immunotoxicology\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"89-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1547691X.2017.1290716\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Immunotoxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547691X.2017.1290716\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547691X.2017.1290716","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

如果特异性药物性肝损伤(IDILI)是免疫介导的,则个体先前暴露于抗原可能会影响其对IDILI的易感性。一个人的记忆免疫细胞库是由过去每次接触抗原形成的。因此,随后的药物引起的药物不良反应可能涉及免疫细胞在先前抗原和由此产生的药物修饰蛋白之间的交叉反应。因此,在本实验中,小鼠用阿莫地喹(AQ)修饰的肝脏蛋白免疫,以模拟先前的暴露;用RIBI佐剂和抗cd40抗体治疗以刺激免疫反应;在AQ治疗前用抗pd1和抗ctla -4抗体治疗,以克服免疫耐受。这种治疗比单独使用AQ治疗导致更大的肝损伤。然而,小鼠没有发生严重的肝损伤。然后用AQ和抗ctla -4抗体对PD1-/-小鼠进行免疫和处理,使免疫和AQ处理期间的免疫耐受均受到损害。然而,即使这样也没有导致肝功能衰竭,肝损伤也没有明显增加,相对于未免疫的PD1-/-小鼠,用抗ctla -4和AQ处理。从这些结果我们得出结论,尽管先前的抗原暴露可能会影响IDILI的风险,但似乎需要非常强的刺激,损害免疫耐受仍然是产生IDILI动物模型的最有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of immunization and checkpoint inhibition on amodiaquine-induced liver injury.

If idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is immune-mediated, it is possible that an individual's prior exposure to antigens may affect their susceptibility to IDILI. An individual's repertoire of memory immune cells is shaped by every past exposure to antigens. Subsequent drug-induced adverse drug reactions may therefore involve an immune cell's cross reactivity between a prior antigen and resulting drug-modified proteins. Therefore in this experiment, mice were immunized with amodiaquine (AQ)-modified hepatic proteins to mimic a previous exposure; treated with a RIBI adjuvant and anti-CD40 antibodies to stimulate an immune response; and, treated with anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies prior to AQ treatment in order to overcome immune tolerance. This treatment led to greater liver injury than treatment with AQ alone. However, the mice did not develop serious liver injury. PD1-/- mice were then immunized and treated with AQ and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies so that immune tolerance would be impaired, both during immunization and also during AQ treatment. However, even this did not result in liver failure, and the liver injury was not significantly increased relative to un-immunized PD1-/- mice treated with anti-CTLA-4 and AQ. From these results we conclude that, although previous antigen exposure may affect the risk of IDILI, it appears that a very strong stimulus is required, and impairing immune tolerance remains the most effective method for producing an animal model of IDILI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Immunotoxicology
Journal of Immunotoxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Immunotoxicology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides a needed singular forum for the international community of immunotoxicologists, immunologists, and toxicologists working in academia, government, consulting, and industry to both publish their original research and be made aware of the research findings of their colleagues in a timely manner. Research from many subdisciplines are presented in the journal, including the areas of molecular, developmental, pulmonary, regulatory, nutritional, mechanistic, wildlife, and environmental immunotoxicology, immunology, and toxicology. Original research articles as well as timely comprehensive reviews are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信