Jane E Huggins, Ramses E Alcaide-Aguirre, Katya Hill
{"title":"文本生成对P300脑机接口性能的影响。","authors":"Jane E Huggins, Ramses E Alcaide-Aguirre, Katya Hill","doi":"10.1080/2326263X.2016.1203629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are intended to provide independent communication for those with the most severe physical impairments. However, development and testing of BCIs is typically conducted with copy-spelling of provided text, which models only a small portion of a functional communication task. This study was designed to determine how BCI performance is affected by novel text generation. We used a within-subject single-session study design in which subjects used a BCI to perform copy-spelling of provided text and to generate self-composed text to describe a picture. Additional off-line analysis was performed to identify changes in the event-related potentials that the BCI detects and to examine the effects of training the BCI classifier on task-specific data. Accuracy was reduced during the picture description task; (<i>t</i>(8)=2.59 <i>p</i>=0.0321). Creating the classifier using self-generated text data significantly improved accuracy on these data; (<i>t</i>(7)=-2.68, <i>p</i>=0.0317), but did not bring performance up to the level achieved during copy-spelling. Thus, this study shows that the task for which the BCI is used makes a difference in BCI accuracy. Task-specific BCI classifiers are a first step to counteract this effect, but additional study is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":45112,"journal":{"name":"Brain-Computer Interfaces","volume":"3 2","pages":"112-120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2326263X.2016.1203629","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of text generation on P300 brain-computer interface performance.\",\"authors\":\"Jane E Huggins, Ramses E Alcaide-Aguirre, Katya Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2326263X.2016.1203629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are intended to provide independent communication for those with the most severe physical impairments. However, development and testing of BCIs is typically conducted with copy-spelling of provided text, which models only a small portion of a functional communication task. This study was designed to determine how BCI performance is affected by novel text generation. We used a within-subject single-session study design in which subjects used a BCI to perform copy-spelling of provided text and to generate self-composed text to describe a picture. Additional off-line analysis was performed to identify changes in the event-related potentials that the BCI detects and to examine the effects of training the BCI classifier on task-specific data. Accuracy was reduced during the picture description task; (<i>t</i>(8)=2.59 <i>p</i>=0.0321). Creating the classifier using self-generated text data significantly improved accuracy on these data; (<i>t</i>(7)=-2.68, <i>p</i>=0.0317), but did not bring performance up to the level achieved during copy-spelling. Thus, this study shows that the task for which the BCI is used makes a difference in BCI accuracy. Task-specific BCI classifiers are a first step to counteract this effect, but additional study is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain-Computer Interfaces\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"112-120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2326263X.2016.1203629\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain-Computer Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2016.1203629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/7/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain-Computer Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2016.1203629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
脑机接口(bci)旨在为那些有最严重身体缺陷的人提供独立的交流。然而,bci的开发和测试通常是通过提供文本的复制拼写来进行的,这只对功能性通信任务的一小部分进行了建模。本研究旨在确定新文本生成对脑机接口性能的影响。我们采用了受试者内部的单次研究设计,其中受试者使用脑机接口(BCI)对提供的文本进行复制拼写,并生成自组成的文本来描述图片。另外还进行了离线分析,以确定BCI检测到的事件相关电位的变化,并检查训练BCI分类器对特定任务数据的影响。在图像描述任务中,准确率降低;(t (8) = 2.59 p = 0.0321)。使用自生成文本数据创建分类器显著提高了这些数据的准确性;(t(7)=-2.68, p=0.0317),但并没有使性能达到复制拼写时的水平。因此,本研究表明,使用脑机接口的任务对脑机接口的准确性有影响。特定于任务的BCI分类器是抵消这种影响的第一步,但还需要进一步的研究。
Effects of text generation on P300 brain-computer interface performance.
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are intended to provide independent communication for those with the most severe physical impairments. However, development and testing of BCIs is typically conducted with copy-spelling of provided text, which models only a small portion of a functional communication task. This study was designed to determine how BCI performance is affected by novel text generation. We used a within-subject single-session study design in which subjects used a BCI to perform copy-spelling of provided text and to generate self-composed text to describe a picture. Additional off-line analysis was performed to identify changes in the event-related potentials that the BCI detects and to examine the effects of training the BCI classifier on task-specific data. Accuracy was reduced during the picture description task; (t(8)=2.59 p=0.0321). Creating the classifier using self-generated text data significantly improved accuracy on these data; (t(7)=-2.68, p=0.0317), but did not bring performance up to the level achieved during copy-spelling. Thus, this study shows that the task for which the BCI is used makes a difference in BCI accuracy. Task-specific BCI classifiers are a first step to counteract this effect, but additional study is needed.