慢性颈部疼痛妇女颈部反射点的评分间信度。

Forschende Komplementarmedizin Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-06-23 DOI:10.1159/000447506
Stefan Weinschenk, Richard Göllner, Markus W Hollmann, Lorenz Hotz, Susanne Picardi, Katharina Hubbert, Thomas Strowitzki, Thomas Meuser
{"title":"慢性颈部疼痛妇女颈部反射点的评分间信度。","authors":"Stefan Weinschenk,&nbsp;Richard Göllner,&nbsp;Markus W Hollmann,&nbsp;Lorenz Hotz,&nbsp;Susanne Picardi,&nbsp;Katharina Hubbert,&nbsp;Thomas Strowitzki,&nbsp;Thomas Meuser","doi":"10.1159/000447506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neck reflex points (NRP) are tender soft tissue areas of the cervical region that display reflectory changes in response to chronic inflammations of correlated regions in the visceral cranium. Six bilateral areas, NRP C0, C1, C2, C3, C4 and C7, are detectable by palpating the lateral neck. We investigated the inter-rater reliability of NRP to assess their potential clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>32 consecutive patients with chronic neck pain were examined for NRP tenderness by an experienced physician and an inexperienced medical student in a blinded design. A detailed description of the palpation technique is included in this section. Absence of pain was defined as pain index (PI) = 0, slight tenderness = 1, and marked pain = 2. Findings were evaluated either by pair-wise Cohen's kappa (ĸ) or by percentage of agreement (PA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Examiners identified 40% and 41% of positive NRP, respectively (PI > 0, physician: 155, student: 157) with a slight preference for the left side (1.2:1). The number of patients identified with >6 positive NRP by the examiners was similar (13 vs. 12 patients). ĸ values ranged from 0.52 to 0.95. The overall kappa was ĸ = 0.80 for the left and ĸ = 0.74 for the right side. PA varied from 78.1% to 96.9% with strongest agreement at NRP C0, NRP C2, and NRP C7. Inter-rater agreement was independent of patients' age, gender, body mass index and examiner's experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high reproducibility suggests the clinical relevance of NRP in women.</p>","PeriodicalId":51049,"journal":{"name":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000447506","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-Rater Reliability of Neck Reflex Points in Women with Chronic Neck Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Weinschenk,&nbsp;Richard Göllner,&nbsp;Markus W Hollmann,&nbsp;Lorenz Hotz,&nbsp;Susanne Picardi,&nbsp;Katharina Hubbert,&nbsp;Thomas Strowitzki,&nbsp;Thomas Meuser\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000447506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neck reflex points (NRP) are tender soft tissue areas of the cervical region that display reflectory changes in response to chronic inflammations of correlated regions in the visceral cranium. Six bilateral areas, NRP C0, C1, C2, C3, C4 and C7, are detectable by palpating the lateral neck. We investigated the inter-rater reliability of NRP to assess their potential clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>32 consecutive patients with chronic neck pain were examined for NRP tenderness by an experienced physician and an inexperienced medical student in a blinded design. A detailed description of the palpation technique is included in this section. Absence of pain was defined as pain index (PI) = 0, slight tenderness = 1, and marked pain = 2. Findings were evaluated either by pair-wise Cohen's kappa (ĸ) or by percentage of agreement (PA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Examiners identified 40% and 41% of positive NRP, respectively (PI > 0, physician: 155, student: 157) with a slight preference for the left side (1.2:1). The number of patients identified with >6 positive NRP by the examiners was similar (13 vs. 12 patients). ĸ values ranged from 0.52 to 0.95. The overall kappa was ĸ = 0.80 for the left and ĸ = 0.74 for the right side. PA varied from 78.1% to 96.9% with strongest agreement at NRP C0, NRP C2, and NRP C7. Inter-rater agreement was independent of patients' age, gender, body mass index and examiner's experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high reproducibility suggests the clinical relevance of NRP in women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forschende Komplementarmedizin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000447506\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forschende Komplementarmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000447506\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/6/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forschende Komplementarmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000447506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:颈部反射点(NRP)是颈部柔软的软组织区域,对内脏颅骨相关区域的慢性炎症反应表现出反射性变化。6个双侧区域,NRP C0, C1, C2, C3, C4和C7,可通过触诊外侧颈部检测到。我们调查了NRP的评分者间信度,以评估其潜在的临床相关性。方法:采用盲法设计,由一名经验丰富的医生和一名经验不足的医学生对32例慢性颈部疼痛患者进行NRP压痛检查。本节将详细介绍触诊技术。无疼痛定义为疼痛指数(PI) = 0,轻微压痛= 1,明显疼痛= 2。研究结果通过配对科恩kappa ()或同意百分比(PA)进行评估。结果:检查人员分别发现40%和41%的NRP阳性(PI > 0,医生:155,学生:157),并轻微倾向于左侧(1.2:1)。检查人员确定的>6个阳性NRP的患者数量相似(13例对12例)。取值范围为0.52 ~ 0.95。左侧总体kappa为 = 0.80,右侧总体kappa为 = 0.74。PA变化范围为78.1% ~ 96.9%,其中NRP C0、NRP C2和NRP C7的一致性最强。评分者之间的一致性与患者的年龄、性别、体重指数和审查员的经验无关。结论:高重复性提示NRP在女性中的临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inter-Rater Reliability of Neck Reflex Points in Women with Chronic Neck Pain.

Background: Neck reflex points (NRP) are tender soft tissue areas of the cervical region that display reflectory changes in response to chronic inflammations of correlated regions in the visceral cranium. Six bilateral areas, NRP C0, C1, C2, C3, C4 and C7, are detectable by palpating the lateral neck. We investigated the inter-rater reliability of NRP to assess their potential clinical relevance.

Methods: 32 consecutive patients with chronic neck pain were examined for NRP tenderness by an experienced physician and an inexperienced medical student in a blinded design. A detailed description of the palpation technique is included in this section. Absence of pain was defined as pain index (PI) = 0, slight tenderness = 1, and marked pain = 2. Findings were evaluated either by pair-wise Cohen's kappa (ĸ) or by percentage of agreement (PA).

Results: Examiners identified 40% and 41% of positive NRP, respectively (PI > 0, physician: 155, student: 157) with a slight preference for the left side (1.2:1). The number of patients identified with >6 positive NRP by the examiners was similar (13 vs. 12 patients). ĸ values ranged from 0.52 to 0.95. The overall kappa was ĸ = 0.80 for the left and ĸ = 0.74 for the right side. PA varied from 78.1% to 96.9% with strongest agreement at NRP C0, NRP C2, and NRP C7. Inter-rater agreement was independent of patients' age, gender, body mass index and examiner's experience.

Conclusion: The high reproducibility suggests the clinical relevance of NRP in women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forschende Komplementarmedizin
Forschende Komplementarmedizin 医学-全科医学与补充医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信