BECCS作为巴西低碳能源系统减缓气候变化的备选方案:估计千兆吨规模二氧化碳储存的潜力和效果

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Tjerk Lap , René Benders , Floor van der Hilst , André Faaij
{"title":"BECCS作为巴西低碳能源系统减缓气候变化的备选方案:估计千兆吨规模二氧化碳储存的潜力和效果","authors":"Tjerk Lap ,&nbsp;René Benders ,&nbsp;Floor van der Hilst ,&nbsp;André Faaij","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) can lead to negative emissions, and is seen as an important option to decarbonize energy systems. Its potential decarbonization contribution depends on low-carbon resource availability, its ability to meet end-use demand and the geological storage potential to safely trap CO<sub>2</sub>. Here an energy system model is used to assess the BECCS decarbonization potential in Brazil, considering uncertainty in low-carbon biomass resources, and storage potential, injection rates and costs of CO<sub>2</sub> storage, assessed in eight scenarios. A spatial explicit analysis is done to make improved estimates on the storage potential, injection rates, and costs for CO<sub>2</sub> storage in the Rio Bonito saline aquifer of the Paraná basin.</p><p>Although there are large differences in storage potential (12–117 Gt CO<sub>2</sub>) and costs (on average 5–15 $/t CO<sub>2</sub>), the accumulated volume of CO<sub>2</sub> stored between 2010 and 2050 is 2.9 Gt CO<sub>2</sub> for all scenarios, with injection rates around 240 Mt CO<sub>2</sub> in 2050. This shows that BECCS is a cost-competitive option to decarbonize the Brazilian energy system, even under pessimistic estimates of CO<sub>2</sub> storage potential and costs, and low biomass availability. The cheapest sink locations are selected, in the high development scenario. When CCS development is low, injection rates are the limiting factor. Locations are selected with the highest injection rates, even though sometimes more expensive. When CO<sub>2</sub> storage is limited, total system costs increase, mainly because decarbonization of the industry and freight transport sector relies on more expensive decarbonization options such as green hydrogen.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 103945"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BECCS as climate mitigation option in a Brazilian low carbon energy system: Estimating potential and effect of gigatonne scale CO2 storage\",\"authors\":\"Tjerk Lap ,&nbsp;René Benders ,&nbsp;Floor van der Hilst ,&nbsp;André Faaij\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) can lead to negative emissions, and is seen as an important option to decarbonize energy systems. Its potential decarbonization contribution depends on low-carbon resource availability, its ability to meet end-use demand and the geological storage potential to safely trap CO<sub>2</sub>. Here an energy system model is used to assess the BECCS decarbonization potential in Brazil, considering uncertainty in low-carbon biomass resources, and storage potential, injection rates and costs of CO<sub>2</sub> storage, assessed in eight scenarios. A spatial explicit analysis is done to make improved estimates on the storage potential, injection rates, and costs for CO<sub>2</sub> storage in the Rio Bonito saline aquifer of the Paraná basin.</p><p>Although there are large differences in storage potential (12–117 Gt CO<sub>2</sub>) and costs (on average 5–15 $/t CO<sub>2</sub>), the accumulated volume of CO<sub>2</sub> stored between 2010 and 2050 is 2.9 Gt CO<sub>2</sub> for all scenarios, with injection rates around 240 Mt CO<sub>2</sub> in 2050. This shows that BECCS is a cost-competitive option to decarbonize the Brazilian energy system, even under pessimistic estimates of CO<sub>2</sub> storage potential and costs, and low biomass availability. The cheapest sink locations are selected, in the high development scenario. When CCS development is low, injection rates are the limiting factor. Locations are selected with the highest injection rates, even though sometimes more expensive. When CO<sub>2</sub> storage is limited, total system costs increase, mainly because decarbonization of the industry and freight transport sector relies on more expensive decarbonization options such as green hydrogen.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103945\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583623001159\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583623001159","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

具有碳捕获和储存(BECCS)的生物能源可导致负排放,并被视为使能源系统脱碳的重要选择。其潜在的脱碳贡献取决于低碳资源的可得性、满足最终用途需求的能力以及安全捕获二氧化碳的地质储存潜力。本文采用能源系统模型评估了巴西BECCS脱碳潜力,考虑了低碳生物质资源的不确定性,以及8种情景下的储存潜力、注入率和二氧化碳储存成本。通过空间显式分析,对paran盆地Rio Bonito盐水含水层的CO2储存潜力、注入速率和成本进行了改进估计。尽管在储存潜力(12 - 117gt CO2)和成本(平均5-15美元/t CO2)方面存在很大差异,但在2010年至2050年期间,所有情景的累积二氧化碳储存量为2.9 Gt CO2, 2050年的注入速率约为2.4亿吨CO2。这表明,即使在对二氧化碳储存潜力和成本的悲观估计以及低生物量可用性的情况下,BECCS也是巴西能源系统脱碳的一种具有成本竞争力的选择。在高开发场景中,选择最便宜的汇位置。当CCS发展较低时,注入速度是限制因素。选择注射速率最高的地点,即使有时更昂贵。当二氧化碳储存有限时,总系统成本增加,主要是因为工业和货运部门的脱碳依赖于更昂贵的脱碳选择,如绿色氢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BECCS as climate mitigation option in a Brazilian low carbon energy system: Estimating potential and effect of gigatonne scale CO2 storage

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) can lead to negative emissions, and is seen as an important option to decarbonize energy systems. Its potential decarbonization contribution depends on low-carbon resource availability, its ability to meet end-use demand and the geological storage potential to safely trap CO2. Here an energy system model is used to assess the BECCS decarbonization potential in Brazil, considering uncertainty in low-carbon biomass resources, and storage potential, injection rates and costs of CO2 storage, assessed in eight scenarios. A spatial explicit analysis is done to make improved estimates on the storage potential, injection rates, and costs for CO2 storage in the Rio Bonito saline aquifer of the Paraná basin.

Although there are large differences in storage potential (12–117 Gt CO2) and costs (on average 5–15 $/t CO2), the accumulated volume of CO2 stored between 2010 and 2050 is 2.9 Gt CO2 for all scenarios, with injection rates around 240 Mt CO2 in 2050. This shows that BECCS is a cost-competitive option to decarbonize the Brazilian energy system, even under pessimistic estimates of CO2 storage potential and costs, and low biomass availability. The cheapest sink locations are selected, in the high development scenario. When CCS development is low, injection rates are the limiting factor. Locations are selected with the highest injection rates, even though sometimes more expensive. When CO2 storage is limited, total system costs increase, mainly because decarbonization of the industry and freight transport sector relies on more expensive decarbonization options such as green hydrogen.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信