Vetscan VS2分析仪和最常用的ALT/GTP试剂评估肝损伤。

Vatsalya Vatsalya, Diana Avila, Jane C Frimodig, Shirish S Barve, Craig J McClain, Leila Gobejishvili
{"title":"Vetscan VS2分析仪和最常用的ALT/GTP试剂评估肝损伤。","authors":"Vatsalya Vatsalya,&nbsp;Diana Avila,&nbsp;Jane C Frimodig,&nbsp;Shirish S Barve,&nbsp;Craig J McClain,&nbsp;Leila Gobejishvili","doi":"10.15406/ghoa.2016.04.00107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Liver injury is estimated by serum alanine aminotransferases (ALT) levels in experimental animal models. Laboratories use various techniques to measure ALT levels including assay reagents and chemistry analyzers. VetScan VS2 (VS2) is widely used in veterinary clinics and research laboratories for highly reproducible, convenient and effective testing. Alternatively, ALT liquid reagent is used by laboratories to estimate liver injury in animal studies. The aim of this study was to perform comparative analyses of data obtained from these two assays in two different animal models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we used two different mouse models and compared the ALT levels measured using VetScan VS2 chemistry analyzer and ALT liquid reagent. Immunohistochemical analysis of hepatic tissue was also performed to document liver pathology. The first model is a high fat diet feeding model that results in a mild hepatic steatosis (fat accumulation in the liver) without elevation of ALT levels. For a severe liver injury model, we employed a hepatotoxin-induced liver injury model (carbon tetrachloride, CCl4), which leads to the development of hepatic fibrosis and very high ALT levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VetScan VS2 and ALT reagent gave different values of ALT for all animal groups. However, linear regression analysis showed a significantly high association between ALT levels obtained by VS2 and ALT liquid reagent in a high-fat feeding model with no liver injury. For the CCl<sub>4</sub> induced liver injury model, serum dilution (5 and 10 times) was performed to obtain accurate results with ALT reagent. ALT levels acquired from both techniques showed a close association. Interestingly, this correlation was closer when serum was diluted 5 fold.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that both methods give similar results when evaluating liver injury in animal studies. However, the serum dilution factor is critical for severe liver injury assessment when using ALT reagent and requires some optimization. In this regard, VetScan VS2 is easier to use and gives comparable results.</p>","PeriodicalId":91483,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology & hepatology (Bartlesville, Okla.)","volume":"4 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890971/pdf/nihms-784052.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liver Injury Assessment by Vetscan VS2 Analyzer and Most Frequently Used ALT/GTP Reagent.\",\"authors\":\"Vatsalya Vatsalya,&nbsp;Diana Avila,&nbsp;Jane C Frimodig,&nbsp;Shirish S Barve,&nbsp;Craig J McClain,&nbsp;Leila Gobejishvili\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/ghoa.2016.04.00107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Liver injury is estimated by serum alanine aminotransferases (ALT) levels in experimental animal models. Laboratories use various techniques to measure ALT levels including assay reagents and chemistry analyzers. VetScan VS2 (VS2) is widely used in veterinary clinics and research laboratories for highly reproducible, convenient and effective testing. Alternatively, ALT liquid reagent is used by laboratories to estimate liver injury in animal studies. The aim of this study was to perform comparative analyses of data obtained from these two assays in two different animal models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we used two different mouse models and compared the ALT levels measured using VetScan VS2 chemistry analyzer and ALT liquid reagent. Immunohistochemical analysis of hepatic tissue was also performed to document liver pathology. The first model is a high fat diet feeding model that results in a mild hepatic steatosis (fat accumulation in the liver) without elevation of ALT levels. For a severe liver injury model, we employed a hepatotoxin-induced liver injury model (carbon tetrachloride, CCl4), which leads to the development of hepatic fibrosis and very high ALT levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VetScan VS2 and ALT reagent gave different values of ALT for all animal groups. However, linear regression analysis showed a significantly high association between ALT levels obtained by VS2 and ALT liquid reagent in a high-fat feeding model with no liver injury. For the CCl<sub>4</sub> induced liver injury model, serum dilution (5 and 10 times) was performed to obtain accurate results with ALT reagent. ALT levels acquired from both techniques showed a close association. Interestingly, this correlation was closer when serum was diluted 5 fold.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that both methods give similar results when evaluating liver injury in animal studies. However, the serum dilution factor is critical for severe liver injury assessment when using ALT reagent and requires some optimization. In this regard, VetScan VS2 is easier to use and gives comparable results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology & hepatology (Bartlesville, Okla.)\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890971/pdf/nihms-784052.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology & hepatology (Bartlesville, Okla.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/ghoa.2016.04.00107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/4/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology & hepatology (Bartlesville, Okla.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/ghoa.2016.04.00107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景与目的:在实验动物模型中,通过血清丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)水平来评估肝损伤。实验室使用各种技术来测量ALT水平,包括分析试剂和化学分析仪。VetScan VS2 (VS2)广泛应用于兽医诊所和研究实验室,具有高重复性、方便、有效的检测功能。另外,ALT液体试剂被实验室用来估计动物研究中的肝损伤。本研究的目的是在两种不同的动物模型中对这两种方法获得的数据进行比较分析。方法:采用两种不同的小鼠模型,比较VetScan VS2化学分析仪和ALT液体试剂测定的ALT水平。肝脏组织的免疫组织化学分析也进行了记录肝脏病理。第一种模型是高脂肪饲料喂养模型,导致轻度肝脂肪变性(肝脏脂肪堆积),ALT水平不升高。对于严重肝损伤模型,我们采用肝毒素诱导的肝损伤模型(四氯化碳,CCl4),导致肝纤维化的发展和非常高的ALT水平。结果:VetScan VS2和ALT试剂对各组动物的ALT测定值不同。然而,线性回归分析显示,在无肝损伤的高脂饲养模型中,VS2与ALT液体试剂获得的ALT水平有显著的高相关性。对于CCl4诱导的肝损伤模型,用ALT试剂进行血清稀释(5倍和10倍)以获得准确的结果。两种技术获得的ALT水平显示出密切的联系。有趣的是,当血清稀释5倍时,这种相关性更密切。结论:本研究表明,两种方法在评估动物肝损伤时的结果相似。然而,在使用ALT试剂时,血清稀释因子是评估严重肝损伤的关键,需要进行一些优化。在这方面,VetScan VS2更容易使用,并提供类似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Liver Injury Assessment by Vetscan VS2 Analyzer and Most Frequently Used ALT/GTP Reagent.

Liver Injury Assessment by Vetscan VS2 Analyzer and Most Frequently Used ALT/GTP Reagent.

Liver Injury Assessment by Vetscan VS2 Analyzer and Most Frequently Used ALT/GTP Reagent.

Liver Injury Assessment by Vetscan VS2 Analyzer and Most Frequently Used ALT/GTP Reagent.

Background and aim: Liver injury is estimated by serum alanine aminotransferases (ALT) levels in experimental animal models. Laboratories use various techniques to measure ALT levels including assay reagents and chemistry analyzers. VetScan VS2 (VS2) is widely used in veterinary clinics and research laboratories for highly reproducible, convenient and effective testing. Alternatively, ALT liquid reagent is used by laboratories to estimate liver injury in animal studies. The aim of this study was to perform comparative analyses of data obtained from these two assays in two different animal models.

Methods: In this study, we used two different mouse models and compared the ALT levels measured using VetScan VS2 chemistry analyzer and ALT liquid reagent. Immunohistochemical analysis of hepatic tissue was also performed to document liver pathology. The first model is a high fat diet feeding model that results in a mild hepatic steatosis (fat accumulation in the liver) without elevation of ALT levels. For a severe liver injury model, we employed a hepatotoxin-induced liver injury model (carbon tetrachloride, CCl4), which leads to the development of hepatic fibrosis and very high ALT levels.

Results: VetScan VS2 and ALT reagent gave different values of ALT for all animal groups. However, linear regression analysis showed a significantly high association between ALT levels obtained by VS2 and ALT liquid reagent in a high-fat feeding model with no liver injury. For the CCl4 induced liver injury model, serum dilution (5 and 10 times) was performed to obtain accurate results with ALT reagent. ALT levels acquired from both techniques showed a close association. Interestingly, this correlation was closer when serum was diluted 5 fold.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that both methods give similar results when evaluating liver injury in animal studies. However, the serum dilution factor is critical for severe liver injury assessment when using ALT reagent and requires some optimization. In this regard, VetScan VS2 is easier to use and gives comparable results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信