南加州和波多黎各海岸海滩人源和非人源分离的粪肠球菌和粪肠球菌的毒力基因

IF 1.1 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Pathogens Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-04-10 DOI:10.1155/2016/3437214
Donna M Ferguson, Ginamary Negrón Talavera, Luis A Ríos Hernández, Stephen B Weisberg, Richard F Ambrose, Jennifer A Jay
{"title":"南加州和波多黎各海岸海滩人源和非人源分离的粪肠球菌和粪肠球菌的毒力基因","authors":"Donna M Ferguson,&nbsp;Ginamary Negrón Talavera,&nbsp;Luis A Ríos Hernández,&nbsp;Stephen B Weisberg,&nbsp;Richard F Ambrose,&nbsp;Jennifer A Jay","doi":"10.1155/2016/3437214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium are harmless to humans; however, strains harboring virulence genes, including esp, gelE, cylA, asa1, and hyl, have been associated with human infections. E. faecalis and E. faecium are present in beach waters worldwide, yet little is known about their virulence potential. Here, multiplex PCR was used to compare the distribution of virulence genes among E. faecalis and E. faecium isolated from beaches in Southern California and Puerto Rico to isolates from potential sources including humans, animals, birds, and plants. All five virulence genes were found in E. faecalis and E. faecium from beach water, mostly among E. faecalis. gelE was the most common among isolates from all source types. There was a lower incidence of asa1, esp, cylA, and hyl genes among isolates from beach water, sewage, septage, urban runoff, sea wrack, and eelgrass as compared to human isolates, indicating that virulent strains of E. faecalis and E. faecium may not be widely disseminated at beaches. A higher frequency of asa1 and esp among E. faecalis from dogs and of asa1 among birds (mostly seagull) suggests that further studies on the distribution and virulence potential of strains carrying these genes may be warranted. </p>","PeriodicalId":16788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathogens","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/3437214","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virulence Genes among Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Isolated from Coastal Beaches and Human and Nonhuman Sources in Southern California and Puerto Rico.\",\"authors\":\"Donna M Ferguson,&nbsp;Ginamary Negrón Talavera,&nbsp;Luis A Ríos Hernández,&nbsp;Stephen B Weisberg,&nbsp;Richard F Ambrose,&nbsp;Jennifer A Jay\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2016/3437214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Most Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium are harmless to humans; however, strains harboring virulence genes, including esp, gelE, cylA, asa1, and hyl, have been associated with human infections. E. faecalis and E. faecium are present in beach waters worldwide, yet little is known about their virulence potential. Here, multiplex PCR was used to compare the distribution of virulence genes among E. faecalis and E. faecium isolated from beaches in Southern California and Puerto Rico to isolates from potential sources including humans, animals, birds, and plants. All five virulence genes were found in E. faecalis and E. faecium from beach water, mostly among E. faecalis. gelE was the most common among isolates from all source types. There was a lower incidence of asa1, esp, cylA, and hyl genes among isolates from beach water, sewage, septage, urban runoff, sea wrack, and eelgrass as compared to human isolates, indicating that virulent strains of E. faecalis and E. faecium may not be widely disseminated at beaches. A higher frequency of asa1 and esp among E. faecalis from dogs and of asa1 among birds (mostly seagull) suggests that further studies on the distribution and virulence potential of strains carrying these genes may be warranted. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathogens\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/3437214\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathogens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3437214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/4/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3437214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

大多数粪肠球菌和粪肠球菌对人类无害;然而,含有毒力基因的菌株,包括esp、gelE、cylA、asa1和hyl,与人类感染有关。粪肠杆菌和粪肠杆菌存在于世界各地的海滩水域,但对其潜在的毒力知之甚少。本研究采用多重PCR方法比较了从南加州和波多黎各海滩分离的粪肠球菌和粪肠球菌与从人类、动物、鸟类和植物等潜在来源分离的粪肠球菌的毒力基因分布。5种毒力基因均在粪肠杆菌和滩水粪肠杆菌中发现,且以粪肠杆菌居多。gelE在所有源型分离物中最为常见。海滩水、污水、污水、城市径流、海难和大叶藻分离株中asa1、esp、cylA和hyl基因的发生率低于人类分离株,表明毒力强的粪肠杆菌和粪肠杆菌可能不会在海滩广泛传播。asa1在狗的粪肠杆菌和鸟类(主要是海鸥)中的较高频率表明,对携带这些基因的菌株的分布和毒性潜力的进一步研究可能是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Virulence Genes among Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Isolated from Coastal Beaches and Human and Nonhuman Sources in Southern California and Puerto Rico.

Virulence Genes among Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Isolated from Coastal Beaches and Human and Nonhuman Sources in Southern California and Puerto Rico.

Virulence Genes among Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Isolated from Coastal Beaches and Human and Nonhuman Sources in Southern California and Puerto Rico.

Most Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium are harmless to humans; however, strains harboring virulence genes, including esp, gelE, cylA, asa1, and hyl, have been associated with human infections. E. faecalis and E. faecium are present in beach waters worldwide, yet little is known about their virulence potential. Here, multiplex PCR was used to compare the distribution of virulence genes among E. faecalis and E. faecium isolated from beaches in Southern California and Puerto Rico to isolates from potential sources including humans, animals, birds, and plants. All five virulence genes were found in E. faecalis and E. faecium from beach water, mostly among E. faecalis. gelE was the most common among isolates from all source types. There was a lower incidence of asa1, esp, cylA, and hyl genes among isolates from beach water, sewage, septage, urban runoff, sea wrack, and eelgrass as compared to human isolates, indicating that virulent strains of E. faecalis and E. faecium may not be widely disseminated at beaches. A higher frequency of asa1 and esp among E. faecalis from dogs and of asa1 among birds (mostly seagull) suggests that further studies on the distribution and virulence potential of strains carrying these genes may be warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathogens
Journal of Pathogens MICROBIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信