治疗性乳房成形术的当前实践:英国肿瘤乳房外科医生的调查。

IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
International Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-03-23 DOI:10.1155/2016/1947876
Shweta Aggarwal, Sekhar Marla, Donald Nyanhongo, Sita Kotecha, Narendra Nath Basu
{"title":"治疗性乳房成形术的当前实践:英国肿瘤乳房外科医生的调查。","authors":"Shweta Aggarwal,&nbsp;Sekhar Marla,&nbsp;Donald Nyanhongo,&nbsp;Sita Kotecha,&nbsp;Narendra Nath Basu","doi":"10.1155/2016/1947876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Therapeutic mammaplasty (TM) is a useful technique in the armamentarium of the oncoplastic breast surgeon (OBS). There is limited guidance on patient selection, technique, coding, and management of involved margins. The practices of OBS in England remain unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Questionnaires were sent to all OBS involved with the Training Interface Group. We assessed the number of TM cases performed per surgeon, criteria for patient selection, pedicle preference, contralateral symmetrisation, use of routine preoperative MRI, management of involved margins, and clinical coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We had an overall response rate of 43%. The most common skin resection technique utilised was wise pattern followed by vertical scar. Superior-medial pedicle was preferred by the majority of surgeons (62%) followed by inferior pedicle (34%). Twenty percent of surgeons would always proceed to a mastectomy following an involved margin, whereas the majority would offer reexcision based on several parameters. The main absolute contraindication to TM was tumour to breast ratio >50%. One in five surgeons would not perform TM in smokers and patients with multifocal disease.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is a wide variation in the practice of TM amongst OBS. Further research and guidance would be useful to standardise practice, particularly management of involved margins and coding for optimal reimbursement.</p>","PeriodicalId":45960,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/1947876","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Practice of Therapeutic Mammaplasty: A Survey of Oncoplastic Breast Surgeons in England.\",\"authors\":\"Shweta Aggarwal,&nbsp;Sekhar Marla,&nbsp;Donald Nyanhongo,&nbsp;Sita Kotecha,&nbsp;Narendra Nath Basu\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2016/1947876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Therapeutic mammaplasty (TM) is a useful technique in the armamentarium of the oncoplastic breast surgeon (OBS). There is limited guidance on patient selection, technique, coding, and management of involved margins. The practices of OBS in England remain unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Questionnaires were sent to all OBS involved with the Training Interface Group. We assessed the number of TM cases performed per surgeon, criteria for patient selection, pedicle preference, contralateral symmetrisation, use of routine preoperative MRI, management of involved margins, and clinical coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We had an overall response rate of 43%. The most common skin resection technique utilised was wise pattern followed by vertical scar. Superior-medial pedicle was preferred by the majority of surgeons (62%) followed by inferior pedicle (34%). Twenty percent of surgeons would always proceed to a mastectomy following an involved margin, whereas the majority would offer reexcision based on several parameters. The main absolute contraindication to TM was tumour to breast ratio >50%. One in five surgeons would not perform TM in smokers and patients with multifocal disease.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is a wide variation in the practice of TM amongst OBS. Further research and guidance would be useful to standardise practice, particularly management of involved margins and coding for optimal reimbursement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/1947876\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1947876\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/3/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1947876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

简介:治疗性乳房成形术(TM)是乳腺肿瘤外科医生(OBS)的一项有用的技术。在患者选择、技术、编码和受病灶边缘管理方面的指导有限。OBS在英国的做法尚不为人所知。方法:对参与培训界面组的所有在线商学院进行问卷调查。我们评估了每位外科医生的TM病例数量、患者选择标准、椎弓根偏好、对侧对称性、常规术前MRI的使用、受病灶边缘的处理和临床编码。结果:总有效率为43%。最常用的皮肤切除技术是智慧模式,其次是垂直疤痕。大多数外科医生(62%)选择上内侧椎弓根,其次是下椎弓根(34%)。20%的外科医生总是在乳房边缘受累后进行乳房切除术,而大多数医生会根据几个参数进行再切除。TM的主要绝对禁忌症是肿瘤与乳房的比例大于50%。五分之一的外科医生不愿为吸烟者和多灶性疾病患者实施TM手术。讨论:OBS之间的TM实践有很大的差异。进一步的研究和指导将有助于使实践标准化,特别是对所涉差额的管理和最佳补偿的编码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Current Practice of Therapeutic Mammaplasty: A Survey of Oncoplastic Breast Surgeons in England.

Current Practice of Therapeutic Mammaplasty: A Survey of Oncoplastic Breast Surgeons in England.

Current Practice of Therapeutic Mammaplasty: A Survey of Oncoplastic Breast Surgeons in England.

Current Practice of Therapeutic Mammaplasty: A Survey of Oncoplastic Breast Surgeons in England.

Introduction: Therapeutic mammaplasty (TM) is a useful technique in the armamentarium of the oncoplastic breast surgeon (OBS). There is limited guidance on patient selection, technique, coding, and management of involved margins. The practices of OBS in England remain unknown.

Methods: Questionnaires were sent to all OBS involved with the Training Interface Group. We assessed the number of TM cases performed per surgeon, criteria for patient selection, pedicle preference, contralateral symmetrisation, use of routine preoperative MRI, management of involved margins, and clinical coding.

Results: We had an overall response rate of 43%. The most common skin resection technique utilised was wise pattern followed by vertical scar. Superior-medial pedicle was preferred by the majority of surgeons (62%) followed by inferior pedicle (34%). Twenty percent of surgeons would always proceed to a mastectomy following an involved margin, whereas the majority would offer reexcision based on several parameters. The main absolute contraindication to TM was tumour to breast ratio >50%. One in five surgeons would not perform TM in smokers and patients with multifocal disease.

Discussion: There is a wide variation in the practice of TM amongst OBS. Further research and guidance would be useful to standardise practice, particularly management of involved margins and coding for optimal reimbursement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Surgical Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of surgical oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信