原发性近距离治疗后生化复发前列腺癌的补救性近距离治疗。

IF 2.3 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Prostate Cancer Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-03-22 DOI:10.1155/2016/9561494
John M Lacy, William A Wilson, Raevti Bole, Li Chen, Ali S Meigooni, Randall G Rowland, William H St Clair
{"title":"原发性近距离治疗后生化复发前列腺癌的补救性近距离治疗。","authors":"John M Lacy,&nbsp;William A Wilson,&nbsp;Raevti Bole,&nbsp;Li Chen,&nbsp;Ali S Meigooni,&nbsp;Randall G Rowland,&nbsp;William H St Clair","doi":"10.1155/2016/9561494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose. In this study, we evaluated our experience with salvage brachytherapy after discovery of biochemical recurrence after a prior brachytherapy procedure. Methods and Materials. From 2001 through 2012 twenty-one patients treated by brachytherapy within University of Kentucky or from outside centers developed biochemical failure and had no evidence of metastases. Computed tomography (CT) scans were evaluated; patients who had an underseeded portion of their prostate were considered for reimplantation. Results. The majority of the patients in this study (61.9%) were low risk and median presalvage PSA was 3.49 (range 17.41-1.68). Mean follow-up was 61 months. At last follow-up after reseeding, 11/21 (52.4%) were free of biochemical recurrence. There was a trend towards decreased freedom from biochemical recurrence in low risk patients (p = 0.12). International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) increased at 3-month follow-up visits but decreased and were equivalent to baseline scores at 18 months. Conclusions. Salvage brachytherapy after primary brachytherapy is possible; however, in our experience the side-effect profile after the second brachytherapy procedure was higher than after the first brachytherapy procedure. In this cohort of patients we demonstrate that approximately 50% oncologic control, low risk patients appear to have better outcomes than others. </p>","PeriodicalId":20907,"journal":{"name":"Prostate Cancer","volume":"2016 ","pages":"9561494"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/9561494","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Salvage Brachytherapy for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer following Primary Brachytherapy.\",\"authors\":\"John M Lacy,&nbsp;William A Wilson,&nbsp;Raevti Bole,&nbsp;Li Chen,&nbsp;Ali S Meigooni,&nbsp;Randall G Rowland,&nbsp;William H St Clair\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2016/9561494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Purpose. In this study, we evaluated our experience with salvage brachytherapy after discovery of biochemical recurrence after a prior brachytherapy procedure. Methods and Materials. From 2001 through 2012 twenty-one patients treated by brachytherapy within University of Kentucky or from outside centers developed biochemical failure and had no evidence of metastases. Computed tomography (CT) scans were evaluated; patients who had an underseeded portion of their prostate were considered for reimplantation. Results. The majority of the patients in this study (61.9%) were low risk and median presalvage PSA was 3.49 (range 17.41-1.68). Mean follow-up was 61 months. At last follow-up after reseeding, 11/21 (52.4%) were free of biochemical recurrence. There was a trend towards decreased freedom from biochemical recurrence in low risk patients (p = 0.12). International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) increased at 3-month follow-up visits but decreased and were equivalent to baseline scores at 18 months. Conclusions. Salvage brachytherapy after primary brachytherapy is possible; however, in our experience the side-effect profile after the second brachytherapy procedure was higher than after the first brachytherapy procedure. In this cohort of patients we demonstrate that approximately 50% oncologic control, low risk patients appear to have better outcomes than others. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate Cancer\",\"volume\":\"2016 \",\"pages\":\"9561494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/9561494\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9561494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/3/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9561494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

目的。在这项研究中,我们评估了在先前近距离治疗后发现生化复发后补救性近距离治疗的经验。方法与材料。从2001年到2012年,在肯塔基大学或其他中心接受近距离治疗的21名患者出现生化失败,没有转移的证据。评估计算机断层扫描(CT);前列腺种子不足的患者可以考虑再植入术。结果。本研究中大多数患者(61.9%)为低危患者,中位摄前PSA为3.49(范围17.41-1.68)。平均随访61个月。复种后末次随访,11/21(52.4%)无生化复发。低危患者的生化复发自由度降低(p = 0.12)。国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)在随访3个月时上升,但在随访18个月时下降,与基线评分相当。结论。原发性近距离治疗后的补救性近距离治疗是可能的;然而,根据我们的经验,第二次近距离放疗后的副作用比第一次近距离放疗后的副作用要高。在这组患者中,我们证明了大约50%的肿瘤控制,低风险患者似乎比其他患者有更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Salvage Brachytherapy for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer following Primary Brachytherapy.

Salvage Brachytherapy for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer following Primary Brachytherapy.

Salvage Brachytherapy for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer following Primary Brachytherapy.

Salvage Brachytherapy for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer following Primary Brachytherapy.

Purpose. In this study, we evaluated our experience with salvage brachytherapy after discovery of biochemical recurrence after a prior brachytherapy procedure. Methods and Materials. From 2001 through 2012 twenty-one patients treated by brachytherapy within University of Kentucky or from outside centers developed biochemical failure and had no evidence of metastases. Computed tomography (CT) scans were evaluated; patients who had an underseeded portion of their prostate were considered for reimplantation. Results. The majority of the patients in this study (61.9%) were low risk and median presalvage PSA was 3.49 (range 17.41-1.68). Mean follow-up was 61 months. At last follow-up after reseeding, 11/21 (52.4%) were free of biochemical recurrence. There was a trend towards decreased freedom from biochemical recurrence in low risk patients (p = 0.12). International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) increased at 3-month follow-up visits but decreased and were equivalent to baseline scores at 18 months. Conclusions. Salvage brachytherapy after primary brachytherapy is possible; however, in our experience the side-effect profile after the second brachytherapy procedure was higher than after the first brachytherapy procedure. In this cohort of patients we demonstrate that approximately 50% oncologic control, low risk patients appear to have better outcomes than others.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Prostate Cancer is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a multidisciplinary platform for scientists, surgeons, oncologists and clinicians working on prostate cancer. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the diagnosis, surgery, radiotherapy, drug discovery and medical management of the disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信