文化的本质:人类和其他动物文化能力进化和扩展的八级模型。

IF 1.6 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Miriam Noël Haidle, Michael Bolus, Mark Collard, Nicholas Conard, Duilio Garofoli, Marlize Lombard, April Nowell, Claudio Tennie, Andrew Whiten
{"title":"文化的本质:人类和其他动物文化能力进化和扩展的八级模型。","authors":"Miriam Noël Haidle,&nbsp;Michael Bolus,&nbsp;Mark Collard,&nbsp;Nicholas Conard,&nbsp;Duilio Garofoli,&nbsp;Marlize Lombard,&nbsp;April Nowell,&nbsp;Claudio Tennie,&nbsp;Andrew Whiten","doi":"10.4436/JASS.93011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tracing the evolution of human culture through time is arguably one of the most controversial and complex scholarly endeavors, and a broad evolutionary analysis of how symbolic, linguistic, and cultural capacities emerged and developed in our species is lacking. Here we present a model that, in broad terms, aims to explain the evolution and portray the expansion of human cultural capacities (the EECC model), that can be used as a point of departure for further multidisciplinary discussion and more detailed investigation. The EECC model is designed to be flexible, and can be refined to accommodate future archaeological, paleoanthropological, genetic or evolutionary psychology/behavioral analyses and discoveries. Our proposed concept of cultural behavior differentiates between empirically traceable behavioral performances and behavioral capacities that are theoretical constructs. Based largely on archaeological data (the 'black box' that most directly opens up hominin cultural evolution), and on the extension of observable problem-solution distances, we identify eight grades of cultural capacity. Each of these grades is considered within evolutionary-biological and historical-social trajectories. Importantly, the model does not imply an inevitable progression, but focuses on expansion of cultural capacities based on the integration of earlier achievements. We conclude that there is not a single cultural capacity or a single set of abilities that enabled human culture; rather, several grades of cultural capacity in animals and hominins expanded during our evolution to shape who we are today. </p>","PeriodicalId":48668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Sciences","volume":"93 ","pages":"43-70"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"74","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Nature of Culture: an eight-grade model for the evolution and expansion of cultural capacities in hominins and other animals.\",\"authors\":\"Miriam Noël Haidle,&nbsp;Michael Bolus,&nbsp;Mark Collard,&nbsp;Nicholas Conard,&nbsp;Duilio Garofoli,&nbsp;Marlize Lombard,&nbsp;April Nowell,&nbsp;Claudio Tennie,&nbsp;Andrew Whiten\",\"doi\":\"10.4436/JASS.93011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tracing the evolution of human culture through time is arguably one of the most controversial and complex scholarly endeavors, and a broad evolutionary analysis of how symbolic, linguistic, and cultural capacities emerged and developed in our species is lacking. Here we present a model that, in broad terms, aims to explain the evolution and portray the expansion of human cultural capacities (the EECC model), that can be used as a point of departure for further multidisciplinary discussion and more detailed investigation. The EECC model is designed to be flexible, and can be refined to accommodate future archaeological, paleoanthropological, genetic or evolutionary psychology/behavioral analyses and discoveries. Our proposed concept of cultural behavior differentiates between empirically traceable behavioral performances and behavioral capacities that are theoretical constructs. Based largely on archaeological data (the 'black box' that most directly opens up hominin cultural evolution), and on the extension of observable problem-solution distances, we identify eight grades of cultural capacity. Each of these grades is considered within evolutionary-biological and historical-social trajectories. Importantly, the model does not imply an inevitable progression, but focuses on expansion of cultural capacities based on the integration of earlier achievements. We conclude that there is not a single cultural capacity or a single set of abilities that enabled human culture; rather, several grades of cultural capacity in animals and hominins expanded during our evolution to shape who we are today. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anthropological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"93 \",\"pages\":\"43-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"74\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anthropological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4436/JASS.93011\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4436/JASS.93011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 74

摘要

追踪人类文化的演变可以说是最具争议和最复杂的学术努力之一,而对我们物种中符号、语言和文化能力如何出现和发展的广泛进化分析是缺乏的。在这里,我们提出了一个模型,从广义上讲,旨在解释人类文化能力的演变和描绘人类文化能力的扩展(EECC模型),这可以作为进一步多学科讨论和更详细调查的出发点。EECC模型的设计是灵活的,可以改进以适应未来的考古学、古人类学、遗传或进化心理学/行为分析和发现。我们提出的文化行为概念区分了经验可追溯的行为表现和理论建构的行为能力。在很大程度上基于考古数据(最直接揭示人类文化进化的“黑箱”),并根据可观察到的问题解决距离的扩展,我们确定了文化能力的八个等级。这些等级中的每一个都是在进化-生物和历史-社会轨迹中考虑的。重要的是,该模式并不意味着必然的进步,而是侧重于在整合早期成就的基础上扩大文化能力。我们的结论是,并不是单一的文化能力或单一的一套能力造就了人类文化;相反,在我们的进化过程中,动物和人类的几个等级的文化能力扩大了,塑造了我们今天的样子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Nature of Culture: an eight-grade model for the evolution and expansion of cultural capacities in hominins and other animals.

Tracing the evolution of human culture through time is arguably one of the most controversial and complex scholarly endeavors, and a broad evolutionary analysis of how symbolic, linguistic, and cultural capacities emerged and developed in our species is lacking. Here we present a model that, in broad terms, aims to explain the evolution and portray the expansion of human cultural capacities (the EECC model), that can be used as a point of departure for further multidisciplinary discussion and more detailed investigation. The EECC model is designed to be flexible, and can be refined to accommodate future archaeological, paleoanthropological, genetic or evolutionary psychology/behavioral analyses and discoveries. Our proposed concept of cultural behavior differentiates between empirically traceable behavioral performances and behavioral capacities that are theoretical constructs. Based largely on archaeological data (the 'black box' that most directly opens up hominin cultural evolution), and on the extension of observable problem-solution distances, we identify eight grades of cultural capacity. Each of these grades is considered within evolutionary-biological and historical-social trajectories. Importantly, the model does not imply an inevitable progression, but focuses on expansion of cultural capacities based on the integration of earlier achievements. We conclude that there is not a single cultural capacity or a single set of abilities that enabled human culture; rather, several grades of cultural capacity in animals and hominins expanded during our evolution to shape who we are today.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Anthropological Sciences
Journal of Anthropological Sciences Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anthropological Sciences (JASs) publishes reviews, original papers and notes concerning human paleontology, prehistory, biology and genetics of extinct and extant populations. Particular attention is paid to the significance of Anthropology as an interdisciplinary field of research. Only papers in English can be considered for publication. All contributions are revised by the editorial board together with the panel of referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信