伊朗孕妇波斯语母乳喂养损耗预测工具的跨文化适应、有效性和可靠性

IF 0.4 4区 医学
Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal Pub Date : 2015-03-20 eCollection Date: 2015-03-01 DOI:10.5812/ircmj.26354
Forough Mortazavi, Seyed Abbas Mousavi, Reza Chaman, Ahmad Khosravi, Jill R Janke
{"title":"伊朗孕妇波斯语母乳喂养损耗预测工具的跨文化适应、有效性和可靠性","authors":"Forough Mortazavi,&nbsp;Seyed Abbas Mousavi,&nbsp;Reza Chaman,&nbsp;Ahmad Khosravi,&nbsp;Jill R Janke","doi":"10.5812/ircmj.26354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rate of exclusive breastfeeding in Iran is decreasing. The breastfeeding attrition prediction tools (BAPT) have been validated and used in predicting premature weaning.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to translate the BAPT into Farsi, assess its content validity, and examine its reliability and validity to identify exclusive breastfeeding discontinuation in Iran.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The BAPT was translated into Farsi and the content validity of the Farsi version of the BAPT was assessed. It was administered to 356 pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy, who were residents of a city in northeast of Iran. The structural integrity of the four-factor model was assessed in confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and item-subscale correlations. Validity was assessed using the known-group comparison (128 with vs. 228 without breastfeeding experience) and predictive validity (80 successes vs. 265 failures in exclusive breastfeeding).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The internal consistency of the whole instrument (49 items) was 0.775. CFA provided an acceptable fit to the a priori four-factor model (Chi-square/df = 1.8, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.049, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) = 0.064, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.911). The difference in means of breastfeeding control (BFC) between the participants with and without breastfeeding experience was significant (P < 0.001). In addition, the total score of BAPT and the score of Breast Feeding Control (BFC) subscale were higher in women who were on exclusive breastfeeding than women who were not, at four months postpartum (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study validated the Farsi version of BAPT. It is useful for researchers who want to use it in Iran to identify women at higher risks of Exclusive Breast Feeding (EBF) discontinuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14628,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"e26354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5812/ircmj.26354","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the farsi breastfeeding attrition prediction tools in Iranian pregnant women.\",\"authors\":\"Forough Mortazavi,&nbsp;Seyed Abbas Mousavi,&nbsp;Reza Chaman,&nbsp;Ahmad Khosravi,&nbsp;Jill R Janke\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/ircmj.26354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rate of exclusive breastfeeding in Iran is decreasing. The breastfeeding attrition prediction tools (BAPT) have been validated and used in predicting premature weaning.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to translate the BAPT into Farsi, assess its content validity, and examine its reliability and validity to identify exclusive breastfeeding discontinuation in Iran.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The BAPT was translated into Farsi and the content validity of the Farsi version of the BAPT was assessed. It was administered to 356 pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy, who were residents of a city in northeast of Iran. The structural integrity of the four-factor model was assessed in confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and item-subscale correlations. Validity was assessed using the known-group comparison (128 with vs. 228 without breastfeeding experience) and predictive validity (80 successes vs. 265 failures in exclusive breastfeeding).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The internal consistency of the whole instrument (49 items) was 0.775. CFA provided an acceptable fit to the a priori four-factor model (Chi-square/df = 1.8, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.049, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) = 0.064, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.911). The difference in means of breastfeeding control (BFC) between the participants with and without breastfeeding experience was significant (P < 0.001). In addition, the total score of BAPT and the score of Breast Feeding Control (BFC) subscale were higher in women who were on exclusive breastfeeding than women who were not, at four months postpartum (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study validated the Farsi version of BAPT. It is useful for researchers who want to use it in Iran to identify women at higher risks of Exclusive Breast Feeding (EBF) discontinuation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e26354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5812/ircmj.26354\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.26354\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.26354","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:伊朗纯母乳喂养率正在下降。母乳喂养磨损预测工具(BAPT)已被验证并用于预测过早断奶。目的:我们旨在将BAPT翻译成波斯语,评估其内容效度,并检验其在伊朗确定纯母乳喂养停止的信度和效度。材料与方法:将BAPT翻译成波斯语,评估BAPT波斯语版本的内容效度。该研究对356名怀孕晚期的孕妇进行了研究,她们都是伊朗东北部一个城市的居民。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)和探索性因子分析(EFA)对四因素模型的结构完整性进行评估。信度评估采用Cronbach's alpha系数和项目-子量表相关性。通过已知组比较(有母乳喂养经验的128人对没有母乳喂养经验的228人)和预测效度(纯母乳喂养的80人成功对265人失败)来评估有效性。结果:整个仪器(49项)的内部一致性为0.775。CFA为先验四因素模型提供了可接受的拟合(卡方/df = 1.8,近似均方根误差(RMSEA) = 0.049,标准化均方根残差(SRMR) = 0.064,比较拟合指数(CFI) = 0.911)。有和没有母乳喂养经历的参与者在母乳喂养控制手段(BFC)上的差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。产后4个月纯母乳喂养组的BAPT总分和母乳喂养控制量表(Breast Feeding Control, BFC)总分均高于非纯母乳喂养组(P < 0.05)。结论:本研究验证了波斯语版本的BAPT。对于想要在伊朗使用该方法的研究人员来说,它有助于确定停止纯母乳喂养(EBF)风险较高的妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cross cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the farsi breastfeeding attrition prediction tools in Iranian pregnant women.

Cross cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the farsi breastfeeding attrition prediction tools in Iranian pregnant women.

Background: The rate of exclusive breastfeeding in Iran is decreasing. The breastfeeding attrition prediction tools (BAPT) have been validated and used in predicting premature weaning.

Objectives: We aimed to translate the BAPT into Farsi, assess its content validity, and examine its reliability and validity to identify exclusive breastfeeding discontinuation in Iran.

Materials and methods: The BAPT was translated into Farsi and the content validity of the Farsi version of the BAPT was assessed. It was administered to 356 pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy, who were residents of a city in northeast of Iran. The structural integrity of the four-factor model was assessed in confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and item-subscale correlations. Validity was assessed using the known-group comparison (128 with vs. 228 without breastfeeding experience) and predictive validity (80 successes vs. 265 failures in exclusive breastfeeding).

Results: The internal consistency of the whole instrument (49 items) was 0.775. CFA provided an acceptable fit to the a priori four-factor model (Chi-square/df = 1.8, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.049, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) = 0.064, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.911). The difference in means of breastfeeding control (BFC) between the participants with and without breastfeeding experience was significant (P < 0.001). In addition, the total score of BAPT and the score of Breast Feeding Control (BFC) subscale were higher in women who were on exclusive breastfeeding than women who were not, at four months postpartum (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: This study validated the Farsi version of BAPT. It is useful for researchers who want to use it in Iran to identify women at higher risks of Exclusive Breast Feeding (EBF) discontinuation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal
Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal dealing with general Medicine and Surgery, Disaster Medicine and Health Policy. It is an official Journal of the Iranian Hospital Dubai and is published monthly. The Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal aims at publishing the high quality materials, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of Medicine and Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信