体格检查对腹前刺穿伤是否开腹的预测价值。

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
International journal of clinical and experimental medicine Pub Date : 2015-07-15 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01
Metin Yucel, Gurhan Bas, Adnan Ozpek, Fatih Basak, Abdullah Sisik, Aylin Acar, Buket Altun Ozdemir, Sema Yuksekdag, Orhan Alimoglu
{"title":"体格检查对腹前刺穿伤是否开腹的预测价值。","authors":"Metin Yucel,&nbsp;Gurhan Bas,&nbsp;Adnan Ozpek,&nbsp;Fatih Basak,&nbsp;Abdullah Sisik,&nbsp;Aylin Acar,&nbsp;Buket Altun Ozdemir,&nbsp;Sema Yuksekdag,&nbsp;Orhan Alimoglu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A selective conservative treatment for penetrating anterior abdominal stab injuries is an increasingly recognized approach. We analyzed patients who followed-up and treated for penetrating anterior abdominal stab injuries. The anterior region was defined as the area between the arcus costa at the top and the mid-axillary lines at the laterals and the inguinal ligaments and symphysis pubis at the bottom. An emergency laparotomy was performed on patients who were hemodynamically unstable or had symptoms of peritonitis or organ evisceration; the remaining patients were followed-up selectively and conservatively. A total of 175 patients with purely anterior abdominal injuries were included in the study. One hundred and sixty-five of the patients (94.29%) were males and 10 (5.71%) were females; the mean age of the cohort was 30.85 years (range: 14-69 years). While 16 patients (9%) were made an emergency laparotomy due to hemodynamic instability, peritonitis or evisceration, the remaining patients were hospitalized for observation. During the selective conservative follow-up, an early laparotomy was performed in 20 patients (12%), and a late laparotomy was performed in 13 patients (7%); the remaining 126 patients (72%) were discharged after non-operative follow-up. A laparotomy was performed on 49 patients (28%); the laparotomy was therapeutic for 42 patients (86%), non-therapeutic for 4 patients (8%), and negative for 3 patients (6%). A selective conservative approach based on physical examination and clinical follow-up in penetrating anterior abdominal stab injuries is an effective treatment approach. </p>","PeriodicalId":13892,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4565291/pdf/ijcem0008-11085.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The predictive value of physical examination in the decision of laparotomy in penetrating anterior abdominal stab injury.\",\"authors\":\"Metin Yucel,&nbsp;Gurhan Bas,&nbsp;Adnan Ozpek,&nbsp;Fatih Basak,&nbsp;Abdullah Sisik,&nbsp;Aylin Acar,&nbsp;Buket Altun Ozdemir,&nbsp;Sema Yuksekdag,&nbsp;Orhan Alimoglu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A selective conservative treatment for penetrating anterior abdominal stab injuries is an increasingly recognized approach. We analyzed patients who followed-up and treated for penetrating anterior abdominal stab injuries. The anterior region was defined as the area between the arcus costa at the top and the mid-axillary lines at the laterals and the inguinal ligaments and symphysis pubis at the bottom. An emergency laparotomy was performed on patients who were hemodynamically unstable or had symptoms of peritonitis or organ evisceration; the remaining patients were followed-up selectively and conservatively. A total of 175 patients with purely anterior abdominal injuries were included in the study. One hundred and sixty-five of the patients (94.29%) were males and 10 (5.71%) were females; the mean age of the cohort was 30.85 years (range: 14-69 years). While 16 patients (9%) were made an emergency laparotomy due to hemodynamic instability, peritonitis or evisceration, the remaining patients were hospitalized for observation. During the selective conservative follow-up, an early laparotomy was performed in 20 patients (12%), and a late laparotomy was performed in 13 patients (7%); the remaining 126 patients (72%) were discharged after non-operative follow-up. A laparotomy was performed on 49 patients (28%); the laparotomy was therapeutic for 42 patients (86%), non-therapeutic for 4 patients (8%), and negative for 3 patients (6%). A selective conservative approach based on physical examination and clinical follow-up in penetrating anterior abdominal stab injuries is an effective treatment approach. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4565291/pdf/ijcem0008-11085.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical and experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

选择性保守治疗穿透性腹前刺伤是越来越被认可的方法。我们分析了对穿透性腹前刺伤进行随访和治疗的患者。前区被定义为顶部的costa弧和外侧的腋中线以及底部的腹股沟韧带和耻骨联合之间的区域。对血流动力学不稳定或有腹膜炎或器官内脏切除症状的患者进行紧急剖腹手术;其余患者选择性保守随访。该研究共纳入175例单纯前腹部损伤患者。其中男性165例(94.29%),女性10例(5.71%);队列的平均年龄为30.85岁(范围:14-69岁)。16例(9%)患者因血流动力学不稳定、腹膜炎或内脏切除而紧急开腹,其余患者住院观察。在选择性保守随访中,早期开腹20例(12%),晚期开腹13例(7%);其余126例(72%)经非手术随访出院。49例(28%)患者行剖腹手术;开腹手术治疗42例(86%),非治疗4例(8%),阴性3例(6%)。在体格检查和临床随访的基础上,选择性保守治疗穿透性腹前刺伤是有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The predictive value of physical examination in the decision of laparotomy in penetrating anterior abdominal stab injury.

A selective conservative treatment for penetrating anterior abdominal stab injuries is an increasingly recognized approach. We analyzed patients who followed-up and treated for penetrating anterior abdominal stab injuries. The anterior region was defined as the area between the arcus costa at the top and the mid-axillary lines at the laterals and the inguinal ligaments and symphysis pubis at the bottom. An emergency laparotomy was performed on patients who were hemodynamically unstable or had symptoms of peritonitis or organ evisceration; the remaining patients were followed-up selectively and conservatively. A total of 175 patients with purely anterior abdominal injuries were included in the study. One hundred and sixty-five of the patients (94.29%) were males and 10 (5.71%) were females; the mean age of the cohort was 30.85 years (range: 14-69 years). While 16 patients (9%) were made an emergency laparotomy due to hemodynamic instability, peritonitis or evisceration, the remaining patients were hospitalized for observation. During the selective conservative follow-up, an early laparotomy was performed in 20 patients (12%), and a late laparotomy was performed in 13 patients (7%); the remaining 126 patients (72%) were discharged after non-operative follow-up. A laparotomy was performed on 49 patients (28%); the laparotomy was therapeutic for 42 patients (86%), non-therapeutic for 4 patients (8%), and negative for 3 patients (6%). A selective conservative approach based on physical examination and clinical follow-up in penetrating anterior abdominal stab injuries is an effective treatment approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信