英国短期和中期每日流量的神经预测:一种新颖的见解

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Francesco Granata, Fabio Di Nunno
{"title":"英国短期和中期每日流量的神经预测:一种新颖的见解","authors":"Francesco Granata,&nbsp;Fabio Di Nunno","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Predicting streamflows, which is crucial for flood defence and optimal management of water resources for drinking, irrigation, hydropower generation and ecosystem conservation, is a challenging task in most practical cases. The limitations of physically based models and the increasing availability of time series data on flow rates and other weather and climate variables of interest are increasingly driving the use of models based on Machine Learning algorithms. Of these, neural networks have proven to be among the best-performing prediction tools.</p><p>In this study, four types of neural networks, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBF-NN), Long Short-Term Memory Network (LSTM), and Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory Network (Bi-LSTM), were compared in the prediction of short-term (1–3 days ahead) and medium-term (7–15 days ahead) daily flow rates of six different rivers in the United Kingdom. The predictors consisted only of the lagged values of flow rates and daily cumulative precipitation. The optimal number of these and the hyperparameters of the different algorithms were selected according to a Bayesian optimization procedure.</p><p>The various algorithms demonstrated comparable and strong short-term forecasting abilities, with a slight inclination to underestimate the maximum flood flows. In particular, the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) for 1-day ahead forecasts ranged from 0.909 to 0.986, and the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) ranged from 3.36% to 13.94%. However, as the forecast horizon extended, a reduction in forecasting accuracy was identified, despite all models being able to predict the overall flow pattern, even up to 7–15 days ahead. Compared to LSTM- and Bi-LSTM-based models, RBF-NN-based models showed less of a tendency to underestimate flood peaks and overestimate low flows and could predict both with good accuracy. Additionally, the relative error distribution exhibited a general skew in all models. The findings of this study suggest that RBF-NNs are a powerful tool for obtaining accurate forecasts in both the short- and medium-term while requiring a limited number of parameters to be optimized, thus reducing the calculation time required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"624 ","pages":"Article 129888"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuroforecasting of daily streamflows in the UK for short- and medium-term horizons: A novel insight\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Granata,&nbsp;Fabio Di Nunno\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Predicting streamflows, which is crucial for flood defence and optimal management of water resources for drinking, irrigation, hydropower generation and ecosystem conservation, is a challenging task in most practical cases. The limitations of physically based models and the increasing availability of time series data on flow rates and other weather and climate variables of interest are increasingly driving the use of models based on Machine Learning algorithms. Of these, neural networks have proven to be among the best-performing prediction tools.</p><p>In this study, four types of neural networks, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBF-NN), Long Short-Term Memory Network (LSTM), and Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory Network (Bi-LSTM), were compared in the prediction of short-term (1–3 days ahead) and medium-term (7–15 days ahead) daily flow rates of six different rivers in the United Kingdom. The predictors consisted only of the lagged values of flow rates and daily cumulative precipitation. The optimal number of these and the hyperparameters of the different algorithms were selected according to a Bayesian optimization procedure.</p><p>The various algorithms demonstrated comparable and strong short-term forecasting abilities, with a slight inclination to underestimate the maximum flood flows. In particular, the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) for 1-day ahead forecasts ranged from 0.909 to 0.986, and the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) ranged from 3.36% to 13.94%. However, as the forecast horizon extended, a reduction in forecasting accuracy was identified, despite all models being able to predict the overall flow pattern, even up to 7–15 days ahead. Compared to LSTM- and Bi-LSTM-based models, RBF-NN-based models showed less of a tendency to underestimate flood peaks and overestimate low flows and could predict both with good accuracy. Additionally, the relative error distribution exhibited a general skew in all models. The findings of this study suggest that RBF-NNs are a powerful tool for obtaining accurate forecasts in both the short- and medium-term while requiring a limited number of parameters to be optimized, thus reducing the calculation time required.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"624 \",\"pages\":\"Article 129888\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169423008302\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169423008302","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

在大多数实际情况下,预测流量是一项具有挑战性的任务,它对防洪和饮用水、灌溉、水力发电和生态系统保护等水资源的优化管理至关重要。基于物理模型的局限性,以及关于流量和其他天气和气候变量的时间序列数据的日益可用性,越来越多地推动了基于机器学习算法的模型的使用。其中,神经网络已被证明是表现最好的预测工具之一。本研究比较了多层感知器(MLP)、径向基函数神经网络(RBF-NN)、长短期记忆网络(LSTM)和双向长短期记忆网络(Bi-LSTM)四种神经网络对英国6条不同河流短期(提前1-3天)和中期(提前7-15天)日流量的预测效果。预测因子仅包括流量和日累积降水量的滞后值。根据贝叶斯优化程序选择了这些参数的最优数量和不同算法的超参数。不同算法的短期预测能力具有可比性和较强,但有轻微低估最大洪水流量的倾向。其中,1天预报的决定系数(R2)在0.909 ~ 0.986之间,平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)在3.36% ~ 13.94%之间。然而,随着预测范围的扩大,尽管所有模型都能够预测整体流型,甚至提前7-15天,但预测精度却有所下降。与基于LSTM和bi -LSTM的模型相比,基于rbf - nn的模型低估洪峰和高估低流量的倾向较小,预测精度较高。此外,相对误差分布在所有模型中都表现出普遍的偏态。本研究结果表明,rbf -神经网络是一种强大的工具,可以在有限数量的参数优化的情况下获得准确的中短期预测,从而减少所需的计算时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuroforecasting of daily streamflows in the UK for short- and medium-term horizons: A novel insight

Predicting streamflows, which is crucial for flood defence and optimal management of water resources for drinking, irrigation, hydropower generation and ecosystem conservation, is a challenging task in most practical cases. The limitations of physically based models and the increasing availability of time series data on flow rates and other weather and climate variables of interest are increasingly driving the use of models based on Machine Learning algorithms. Of these, neural networks have proven to be among the best-performing prediction tools.

In this study, four types of neural networks, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBF-NN), Long Short-Term Memory Network (LSTM), and Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory Network (Bi-LSTM), were compared in the prediction of short-term (1–3 days ahead) and medium-term (7–15 days ahead) daily flow rates of six different rivers in the United Kingdom. The predictors consisted only of the lagged values of flow rates and daily cumulative precipitation. The optimal number of these and the hyperparameters of the different algorithms were selected according to a Bayesian optimization procedure.

The various algorithms demonstrated comparable and strong short-term forecasting abilities, with a slight inclination to underestimate the maximum flood flows. In particular, the coefficient of determination (R2) for 1-day ahead forecasts ranged from 0.909 to 0.986, and the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) ranged from 3.36% to 13.94%. However, as the forecast horizon extended, a reduction in forecasting accuracy was identified, despite all models being able to predict the overall flow pattern, even up to 7–15 days ahead. Compared to LSTM- and Bi-LSTM-based models, RBF-NN-based models showed less of a tendency to underestimate flood peaks and overestimate low flows and could predict both with good accuracy. Additionally, the relative error distribution exhibited a general skew in all models. The findings of this study suggest that RBF-NNs are a powerful tool for obtaining accurate forecasts in both the short- and medium-term while requiring a limited number of parameters to be optimized, thus reducing the calculation time required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信