左氧氟沙星体外抗下呼吸道病原菌活性研究。

Soma Sarkar, Atreyi Chakraborty, Mallika Sengupta, Sougata Ghosh, Subhasish Mukhopadhyay, Manideepa SenGupta
{"title":"左氧氟沙星体外抗下呼吸道病原菌活性研究。","authors":"Soma Sarkar,&nbsp;Atreyi Chakraborty,&nbsp;Mallika Sengupta,&nbsp;Sougata Ghosh,&nbsp;Subhasish Mukhopadhyay,&nbsp;Manideepa SenGupta","doi":"10.4103/0976-0105.160749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considerable morbidity and mortality are associated with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) that put a considerable strain on the health budget. Selection of appropriate antibiotics as empirical therapy maximizes positive patient outcomes, and that depends on regular surveillance of infective agents and their antibiograms, which vary according to the geographical areas.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim was to study the drug susceptibility pattern of the isolated pathogens of the respiratory tract infections.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Retrospective study for a period of 1-year 3 months from January 2013 to March 2014 at a Tertiary Care Hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eleven hundred and eighty-four sputum samples from both outdoor and indoor patients with symptoms of LRTI were processed, and antibiotic sensitivity test was done to commonly used antibiotics. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 502 quality sputum samples, 312 (62.15%) samples showed growth of pathogenic bacteria. The most common pathogens were Klebsiella spp. (38.14%), Moraxella spp. (16.02%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (14.10%), Pseudomonas spp. (9.93%), S. aureus (9.29%). It was found that the overall susceptibility pattern was <50% for amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefuroxime, cotrimoxazole and erythromycin whereas for cefotaxime, cefixime, and cefoperazone-sulbactum it was 60.08%, 51.59%, 69.04%, respectively. The susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and levofloxacin were 66.67%, 70.19% and 83.33%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Klebsiella spp. was the most common LRTI pathogen. There was limited activity of amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefuroxime, cotrimoxazole and erythromycin for the treatment of LRTI whereas levofloxacin, (being an oral drug with good compliance) had good activity against respiratory pathogens and could be used for empiric treatment in LRTI.</p>","PeriodicalId":15046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","volume":"6 3","pages":"89-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/73/b5/JBCP-6-89.PMC4513337.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro activity of levofloxacin against lower respiratory tract pathogens.\",\"authors\":\"Soma Sarkar,&nbsp;Atreyi Chakraborty,&nbsp;Mallika Sengupta,&nbsp;Sougata Ghosh,&nbsp;Subhasish Mukhopadhyay,&nbsp;Manideepa SenGupta\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/0976-0105.160749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considerable morbidity and mortality are associated with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) that put a considerable strain on the health budget. Selection of appropriate antibiotics as empirical therapy maximizes positive patient outcomes, and that depends on regular surveillance of infective agents and their antibiograms, which vary according to the geographical areas.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim was to study the drug susceptibility pattern of the isolated pathogens of the respiratory tract infections.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Retrospective study for a period of 1-year 3 months from January 2013 to March 2014 at a Tertiary Care Hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eleven hundred and eighty-four sputum samples from both outdoor and indoor patients with symptoms of LRTI were processed, and antibiotic sensitivity test was done to commonly used antibiotics. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 502 quality sputum samples, 312 (62.15%) samples showed growth of pathogenic bacteria. The most common pathogens were Klebsiella spp. (38.14%), Moraxella spp. (16.02%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (14.10%), Pseudomonas spp. (9.93%), S. aureus (9.29%). It was found that the overall susceptibility pattern was <50% for amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefuroxime, cotrimoxazole and erythromycin whereas for cefotaxime, cefixime, and cefoperazone-sulbactum it was 60.08%, 51.59%, 69.04%, respectively. The susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and levofloxacin were 66.67%, 70.19% and 83.33%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Klebsiella spp. was the most common LRTI pathogen. There was limited activity of amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefuroxime, cotrimoxazole and erythromycin for the treatment of LRTI whereas levofloxacin, (being an oral drug with good compliance) had good activity against respiratory pathogens and could be used for empiric treatment in LRTI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"89-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/73/b5/JBCP-6-89.PMC4513337.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.160749\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.160749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:相当大的发病率和死亡率与下呼吸道感染(LRTIs)有关,这给卫生预算带来了相当大的压力。选择适当的抗生素作为经验性治疗可最大限度地提高患者的积极结果,这取决于对感染因子及其抗生素谱的定期监测,这些监测因地理区域而异。目的:研究分离的呼吸道感染病原菌的药敏规律。背景和设计:2013年1月至2014年3月在某三级医院进行为期1年3个月的回顾性研究。材料与方法:对1184例有下呼吸道感染症状的室外和室内患者的痰液标本进行处理,并对常用抗生素进行抗生素敏感性试验。采用描述性统计方法对数据进行分析。结果:502份优质痰标本中有312份(62.15%)检出致病菌。常见病原菌为克雷伯氏菌(38.14%)、莫拉氏菌(16.02%)、肺炎链球菌(14.10%)、假单胞菌(9.93%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(9.29%)。结论:克雷伯氏菌是最常见的下呼吸道感染病原菌。阿莫西林、阿莫西林-克拉维酸、头孢呋辛、复方新诺明和红霉素对下呼吸道感染的治疗效果有限,而左氧氟沙星作为一种口服药物,对呼吸道病原体的治疗效果较好,可用于下呼吸道感染的经治性治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

In vitro activity of levofloxacin against lower respiratory tract pathogens.

In vitro activity of levofloxacin against lower respiratory tract pathogens.

In vitro activity of levofloxacin against lower respiratory tract pathogens.

In vitro activity of levofloxacin against lower respiratory tract pathogens.

Background: Considerable morbidity and mortality are associated with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) that put a considerable strain on the health budget. Selection of appropriate antibiotics as empirical therapy maximizes positive patient outcomes, and that depends on regular surveillance of infective agents and their antibiograms, which vary according to the geographical areas.

Aim: The aim was to study the drug susceptibility pattern of the isolated pathogens of the respiratory tract infections.

Settings and design: Retrospective study for a period of 1-year 3 months from January 2013 to March 2014 at a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Materials and methods: Eleven hundred and eighty-four sputum samples from both outdoor and indoor patients with symptoms of LRTI were processed, and antibiotic sensitivity test was done to commonly used antibiotics. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the data.

Results: Among 502 quality sputum samples, 312 (62.15%) samples showed growth of pathogenic bacteria. The most common pathogens were Klebsiella spp. (38.14%), Moraxella spp. (16.02%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (14.10%), Pseudomonas spp. (9.93%), S. aureus (9.29%). It was found that the overall susceptibility pattern was <50% for amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefuroxime, cotrimoxazole and erythromycin whereas for cefotaxime, cefixime, and cefoperazone-sulbactum it was 60.08%, 51.59%, 69.04%, respectively. The susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and levofloxacin were 66.67%, 70.19% and 83.33%, respectively.

Conclusion: Klebsiella spp. was the most common LRTI pathogen. There was limited activity of amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefuroxime, cotrimoxazole and erythromycin for the treatment of LRTI whereas levofloxacin, (being an oral drug with good compliance) had good activity against respiratory pathogens and could be used for empiric treatment in LRTI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信