经口内窥镜下肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症时,右肩仰卧位与左侧卧位的安全性和有效性:一项大样本回顾性研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gastroenterology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-09-22 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/3202212
Nanjun Wang, Ningli Chai, Longsong Li, Yawei Bi, Shengzhen Liu, Wengang Zhang, Shasha Wang, Enqiang Linghu
{"title":"经口内窥镜下肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症时,右肩仰卧位与左侧卧位的安全性和有效性:一项大样本回顾性研究。","authors":"Nanjun Wang,&nbsp;Ningli Chai,&nbsp;Longsong Li,&nbsp;Yawei Bi,&nbsp;Shengzhen Liu,&nbsp;Wengang Zhang,&nbsp;Shasha Wang,&nbsp;Enqiang Linghu","doi":"10.1155/2022/3202212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The correct surgical position is very important in the treatment of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia, which can make the procedure safer and more efficient. Currently, there are two commonly used positions: the supine position with the right shoulder raised and the left lateral position. This study aims to evaluate the differences in the safety and efficacy of these two positions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of 702 patients with achalasia undergoing POEM from December 2010 to December 2020. These patients were divided into the supine position with the right shoulder raised group (<i>n</i> = 579) and the left lateral position group (<i>n</i> = 123). The efficacy of POEM and adverse events were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical characteristics were similar in both groups, and there were no significant differences between the two groups in the Eckardt score change, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) basal pressure or residual pressure after POEM (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). The mean operative time in the supine position with the right shoulder raised group was significantly shorter than that in the left lateral position group (43.5 min vs. 54.6 min, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In addition, the differences between the two groups in terms of gas-related complications, such as pneumoperitoneum, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema were statistically significant (all <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The efficacy of POEM was comparable between the two groups. However, the supine position with the right shoulder raised significantly reduced the operative time and the rate of procedure-related adverse events, especially gas-related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12597,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"3202212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9553715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Efficacy of the Supine Position with the Right Shoulder Raised versus the Left Lateral Position in Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia: A Large-Sample Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nanjun Wang,&nbsp;Ningli Chai,&nbsp;Longsong Li,&nbsp;Yawei Bi,&nbsp;Shengzhen Liu,&nbsp;Wengang Zhang,&nbsp;Shasha Wang,&nbsp;Enqiang Linghu\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/3202212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The correct surgical position is very important in the treatment of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia, which can make the procedure safer and more efficient. Currently, there are two commonly used positions: the supine position with the right shoulder raised and the left lateral position. This study aims to evaluate the differences in the safety and efficacy of these two positions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of 702 patients with achalasia undergoing POEM from December 2010 to December 2020. These patients were divided into the supine position with the right shoulder raised group (<i>n</i> = 579) and the left lateral position group (<i>n</i> = 123). The efficacy of POEM and adverse events were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical characteristics were similar in both groups, and there were no significant differences between the two groups in the Eckardt score change, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) basal pressure or residual pressure after POEM (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). The mean operative time in the supine position with the right shoulder raised group was significantly shorter than that in the left lateral position group (43.5 min vs. 54.6 min, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In addition, the differences between the two groups in terms of gas-related complications, such as pneumoperitoneum, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema were statistically significant (all <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The efficacy of POEM was comparable between the two groups. However, the supine position with the right shoulder raised significantly reduced the operative time and the rate of procedure-related adverse events, especially gas-related complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3202212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9553715/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3202212\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3202212","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在经口内窥镜下肌切开术(POEM)治疗贲门失弛缓症中,正确的手术体位非常重要,可以使手术更安全、更有效。目前常用的体位有两种:仰卧位,右肩抬高,左侧侧卧位。本研究旨在评价这两种体位在安全性和有效性上的差异。方法:2010年12月至2020年12月,我们对702例贲门失弛缓症患者进行了回顾性研究。将患者分为仰卧位右肩抬高组(n = 579)和左侧侧卧位组(n = 123)。对POEM的疗效及不良事件进行分析。结果:两组患者临床特征相似,POEM术后Eckardt评分变化、食管下括约肌(LES)基础压、残压差异均无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。仰卧位右肩抬高组平均手术时间明显短于左侧侧卧位组(分别为43.5 min和54.6 min, p < 0.001)。此外,两组在气腹、纵隔气肿、皮下气肿等气体相关并发症方面差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:两组间POEM的疗效具有可比性。然而,仰卧位右肩抬高明显减少了手术时间和手术相关不良事件的发生率,特别是与气体相关的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Safety and Efficacy of the Supine Position with the Right Shoulder Raised versus the Left Lateral Position in Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia: A Large-Sample Retrospective Study.

Safety and Efficacy of the Supine Position with the Right Shoulder Raised versus the Left Lateral Position in Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia: A Large-Sample Retrospective Study.

Safety and Efficacy of the Supine Position with the Right Shoulder Raised versus the Left Lateral Position in Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia: A Large-Sample Retrospective Study.

Background: The correct surgical position is very important in the treatment of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia, which can make the procedure safer and more efficient. Currently, there are two commonly used positions: the supine position with the right shoulder raised and the left lateral position. This study aims to evaluate the differences in the safety and efficacy of these two positions.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 702 patients with achalasia undergoing POEM from December 2010 to December 2020. These patients were divided into the supine position with the right shoulder raised group (n = 579) and the left lateral position group (n = 123). The efficacy of POEM and adverse events were analyzed.

Results: The clinical characteristics were similar in both groups, and there were no significant differences between the two groups in the Eckardt score change, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) basal pressure or residual pressure after POEM (all p > 0.05). The mean operative time in the supine position with the right shoulder raised group was significantly shorter than that in the left lateral position group (43.5 min vs. 54.6 min, respectively, p < 0.001). In addition, the differences between the two groups in terms of gas-related complications, such as pneumoperitoneum, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema were statistically significant (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The efficacy of POEM was comparable between the two groups. However, the supine position with the right shoulder raised significantly reduced the operative time and the rate of procedure-related adverse events, especially gas-related complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Gastroenterology Research and Practice GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal which publishes original research articles, review articles and clinical studies based on all areas of gastroenterology, hepatology, pancreas and biliary, and related cancers. The journal welcomes submissions on the physiology, pathophysiology, etiology, diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal diseases. The aim of the journal is to provide cutting edge research related to the field of gastroenterology, as well as digestive diseases and disorders. Topics of interest include: Management of pancreatic diseases Third space endoscopy Endoscopic resection Therapeutic endoscopy Therapeutic endosonography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信