锥形束计算机断层扫描中千伏峰值和金属伪影还原工具对钛氧化锆和氧化锆种植体周围骨缺损检测的影响。

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Imaging Science in Dentistry Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-05 DOI:10.5624/isd.20220040
Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele, Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento, Ana Catarina Imbelloni-Vasconcelos, Luciano Augusto Cano Martins, Andrea Dos Anjos Pontual, Flávia Maria Moraes Ramos-Perez, Deborah Queiroz Freitas
{"title":"锥形束计算机断层扫描中千伏峰值和金属伪影还原工具对钛氧化锆和氧化锆种植体周围骨缺损检测的影响。","authors":"Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele,&nbsp;Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento,&nbsp;Ana Catarina Imbelloni-Vasconcelos,&nbsp;Luciano Augusto Cano Martins,&nbsp;Andrea Dos Anjos Pontual,&nbsp;Flávia Maria Moraes Ramos-Perez,&nbsp;Deborah Queiroz Freitas","doi":"10.5624/isd.20220040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the influence of kilovoltage-peak (kVp) and the metal artifact reduction (MAR) tool on the detection of buccal and lingual peri-implant dehiscence in the presence of titanium-zirconia (Ti-Zr) and zirconia (Zr) implants in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty implant sites were created in the posterior region of human mandibles, including control sites (without dehiscence) and experimental sites (with dehiscence). Individually, a Ti-Zr or Zr implant was placed in each implant site. CBCT scans were performed using a Picasso Trio device, with variation in the kVp setting (70 or 90 kVp) and whether the MAR tool was used. Three oral radiologists scored the detection of dehiscence using a 5-point scale. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated and compared by multi-way analysis of variance (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The kVp, cortical plate involved (buccal or lingual cortices), and MAR did not influence any diagnostic values (<i>P</i>>0.05). The material of the implant did not influence the ROC curve values (<i>P</i>>0.05). In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity were statistically significantly influenced by the implant material (<i>P</i><0.05) with Zr implants showing higher sensitivity values and lower specificity values than Ti-Zr implants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The detection of peri-implant dehiscence was not influenced by kVp, use of the MAR tool, or the cortical plate. Greater sensitivity and lower specificity were shown for the detection of peri-implant dehiscence in the presence of a Zr implant.</p>","PeriodicalId":51714,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/50/50/isd-52-267.PMC9530290.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of kilovoltage-peak and the metal artifact reduction tool in cone-beam computed tomography on the detection of bone defects around titanium-zirconia and zirconia implants.\",\"authors\":\"Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele,&nbsp;Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento,&nbsp;Ana Catarina Imbelloni-Vasconcelos,&nbsp;Luciano Augusto Cano Martins,&nbsp;Andrea Dos Anjos Pontual,&nbsp;Flávia Maria Moraes Ramos-Perez,&nbsp;Deborah Queiroz Freitas\",\"doi\":\"10.5624/isd.20220040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the influence of kilovoltage-peak (kVp) and the metal artifact reduction (MAR) tool on the detection of buccal and lingual peri-implant dehiscence in the presence of titanium-zirconia (Ti-Zr) and zirconia (Zr) implants in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty implant sites were created in the posterior region of human mandibles, including control sites (without dehiscence) and experimental sites (with dehiscence). Individually, a Ti-Zr or Zr implant was placed in each implant site. CBCT scans were performed using a Picasso Trio device, with variation in the kVp setting (70 or 90 kVp) and whether the MAR tool was used. Three oral radiologists scored the detection of dehiscence using a 5-point scale. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated and compared by multi-way analysis of variance (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The kVp, cortical plate involved (buccal or lingual cortices), and MAR did not influence any diagnostic values (<i>P</i>>0.05). The material of the implant did not influence the ROC curve values (<i>P</i>>0.05). In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity were statistically significantly influenced by the implant material (<i>P</i><0.05) with Zr implants showing higher sensitivity values and lower specificity values than Ti-Zr implants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The detection of peri-implant dehiscence was not influenced by kVp, use of the MAR tool, or the cortical plate. Greater sensitivity and lower specificity were shown for the detection of peri-implant dehiscence in the presence of a Zr implant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Imaging Science in Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/50/50/isd-52-267.PMC9530290.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Imaging Science in Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20220040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20220040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像中,在钛锆(Ti-Zr)和氧化锆(Zr)种植体存在的情况下,千伏峰值(kVp)和金属伪影还原(MAR)工具对颊部和舌部种植体周围破裂检测的影响。材料和方法:在人下颌骨后缘建立20个种植体位点,包括对照位点(无开裂)和实验位点(有开裂)。分别在每个种植部位放置Ti-Zr或Zr种植体。使用Picasso Trio装置进行CBCT扫描,不同的kVp设置(70或90 kVp)以及是否使用MAR工具。三名口腔放射科医生使用5分制对裂口检测进行评分。计算受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积、敏感性和特异性,采用多路方差分析进行比较(α=0.05)。结果:kVp、受累的皮质板(颊皮质或舌皮质)和MAR对诊断价值均无影响(P>0.05)。种植体材料对ROC曲线值无显著影响(P>0.05)。相比之下,种植体材料对敏感性和特异性的影响具有统计学意义(p)。结论:kVp、使用MAR工具或皮质钢板对种植体周围开裂的检测不受影响。更高的灵敏度和较低的特异性显示检测种植体周围裂开的存在的Zr种植体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Influence of kilovoltage-peak and the metal artifact reduction tool in cone-beam computed tomography on the detection of bone defects around titanium-zirconia and zirconia implants.

Influence of kilovoltage-peak and the metal artifact reduction tool in cone-beam computed tomography on the detection of bone defects around titanium-zirconia and zirconia implants.

Influence of kilovoltage-peak and the metal artifact reduction tool in cone-beam computed tomography on the detection of bone defects around titanium-zirconia and zirconia implants.

Influence of kilovoltage-peak and the metal artifact reduction tool in cone-beam computed tomography on the detection of bone defects around titanium-zirconia and zirconia implants.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the influence of kilovoltage-peak (kVp) and the metal artifact reduction (MAR) tool on the detection of buccal and lingual peri-implant dehiscence in the presence of titanium-zirconia (Ti-Zr) and zirconia (Zr) implants in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.

Materials and methods: Twenty implant sites were created in the posterior region of human mandibles, including control sites (without dehiscence) and experimental sites (with dehiscence). Individually, a Ti-Zr or Zr implant was placed in each implant site. CBCT scans were performed using a Picasso Trio device, with variation in the kVp setting (70 or 90 kVp) and whether the MAR tool was used. Three oral radiologists scored the detection of dehiscence using a 5-point scale. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated and compared by multi-way analysis of variance (α=0.05).

Results: The kVp, cortical plate involved (buccal or lingual cortices), and MAR did not influence any diagnostic values (P>0.05). The material of the implant did not influence the ROC curve values (P>0.05). In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity were statistically significantly influenced by the implant material (P<0.05) with Zr implants showing higher sensitivity values and lower specificity values than Ti-Zr implants.

Conclusion: The detection of peri-implant dehiscence was not influenced by kVp, use of the MAR tool, or the cortical plate. Greater sensitivity and lower specificity were shown for the detection of peri-implant dehiscence in the presence of a Zr implant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Imaging Science in Dentistry
Imaging Science in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信