肝硬化患者中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率与自发性细菌性腹膜炎:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2022-09-27 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/8604060
Seyed Arsalan Seyedi, Seyed Ali Nabipoorashrafi, Jairo Hernandez, Andrew Nguyen, Brandon Lucke-Wold, Shima Nourigheimasi, Shokoufeh Khanzadeh
{"title":"肝硬化患者中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率与自发性细菌性腹膜炎:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Seyed Arsalan Seyedi,&nbsp;Seyed Ali Nabipoorashrafi,&nbsp;Jairo Hernandez,&nbsp;Andrew Nguyen,&nbsp;Brandon Lucke-Wold,&nbsp;Shima Nourigheimasi,&nbsp;Shokoufeh Khanzadeh","doi":"10.1155/2022/8604060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was analyzing published studies on the role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in infection and spatially spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) among cirrhotic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched until May 24, 2022. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 14 studies included in our study, six studies were on infection with 2786 hospitalized cirrhotic patients, of whom 934 developed an infection. Other studies were on SBP with 1573 cirrhotic patients with ascites, of whom 557 developed SBP. The pooled results showed that there was no difference in NLR levels between hospitalized cirrhotic patients who developed infection compared to those who did not (random-effects model: SMD = 0.63, 95% CI = -0.01-1.27, <i>p</i>=0.054). However, cirrhotic patients with ascites who developed SBP had elevated levels of NLR compared to those who did not (random-effects model: SMD = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.52-1.57,<i>p</i> < 0.001). This difference remained significant in prospective studies (SMD = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.51-1.38,<i>p</i> < 0.001) but not in retrospective studies (SMD = 1.37, 95% CI = -0.56-3.29,<i>p</i>=0.165), in the subgroup analysis according to the study design. The pooled sensitivity of NLR was 92.07% (95% CI = 74.85%-97.84%) and the pooled specificity was 72.58% (95% CI = 57.72%-83.69%). The pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, DOR of NLR were 3.35(95%CI = 2.06-5.46), 0.10 (95%CI = 0.03-0.38), and 30.78 (95%CI = 7.01-135.04), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results support NLR to be a valid biomarker that can be readily integrated into clinical settings to help in the prevention and prediction of SBP among cirrhotic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48755,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"8604060"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532151/pdf/","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis among Cirrhotic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Seyed Arsalan Seyedi,&nbsp;Seyed Ali Nabipoorashrafi,&nbsp;Jairo Hernandez,&nbsp;Andrew Nguyen,&nbsp;Brandon Lucke-Wold,&nbsp;Shima Nourigheimasi,&nbsp;Shokoufeh Khanzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/8604060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was analyzing published studies on the role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in infection and spatially spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) among cirrhotic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched until May 24, 2022. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for quality assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 14 studies included in our study, six studies were on infection with 2786 hospitalized cirrhotic patients, of whom 934 developed an infection. Other studies were on SBP with 1573 cirrhotic patients with ascites, of whom 557 developed SBP. The pooled results showed that there was no difference in NLR levels between hospitalized cirrhotic patients who developed infection compared to those who did not (random-effects model: SMD = 0.63, 95% CI = -0.01-1.27, <i>p</i>=0.054). However, cirrhotic patients with ascites who developed SBP had elevated levels of NLR compared to those who did not (random-effects model: SMD = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.52-1.57,<i>p</i> < 0.001). This difference remained significant in prospective studies (SMD = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.51-1.38,<i>p</i> < 0.001) but not in retrospective studies (SMD = 1.37, 95% CI = -0.56-3.29,<i>p</i>=0.165), in the subgroup analysis according to the study design. The pooled sensitivity of NLR was 92.07% (95% CI = 74.85%-97.84%) and the pooled specificity was 72.58% (95% CI = 57.72%-83.69%). The pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, DOR of NLR were 3.35(95%CI = 2.06-5.46), 0.10 (95%CI = 0.03-0.38), and 30.78 (95%CI = 7.01-135.04), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results support NLR to be a valid biomarker that can be readily integrated into clinical settings to help in the prevention and prediction of SBP among cirrhotic patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8604060\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9532151/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8604060\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8604060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是分析已发表的关于中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)在肝硬化患者感染和空间自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)中的作用的研究。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus至2022年5月24日。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行质量评估。结果:在纳入我们研究的14项研究中,6项研究涉及2786名住院肝硬化患者的感染,其中934人发生感染。其他研究对1573例肝硬化腹水患者的收缩压进行了研究,其中557例发生了收缩压。合并结果显示,发生感染的住院肝硬化患者与未发生感染的住院肝硬化患者的NLR水平无差异(随机效应模型:SMD = 0.63, 95% CI = -0.01-1.27, p=0.054)。然而,与未发生SBP的肝硬化腹水患者相比,发生SBP的患者NLR水平升高(随机效应模型:SMD = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.52-1.57,p < 0.001)。这种差异在前瞻性研究(SMD = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.51-1.38,p < 0.001)中仍然显著,但在回顾性研究(SMD = 1.37, 95% CI = -0.56-3.29,p=0.165)中,根据研究设计进行亚组分析时,这种差异不显著。NLR的合并敏感性为92.07% (95% CI = 74.85% ~ 97.84%),合并特异性为72.58% (95% CI = 57.72% ~ 83.69%)。NLR的合并阳性似然比为3.35(95%CI = 2.06 ~ 5.46),阴性似然比为0.10 (95%CI = 0.03 ~ 0.38), DOR为30.78 (95%CI = 7.01 ~ 135.04)。结论:我们的研究结果支持NLR是一种有效的生物标志物,可以很容易地整合到临床环境中,帮助预防和预测肝硬化患者的收缩压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis among Cirrhotic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis among Cirrhotic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis among Cirrhotic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis among Cirrhotic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was analyzing published studies on the role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in infection and spatially spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) among cirrhotic patients.

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched until May 24, 2022. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for quality assessment.

Results: Of 14 studies included in our study, six studies were on infection with 2786 hospitalized cirrhotic patients, of whom 934 developed an infection. Other studies were on SBP with 1573 cirrhotic patients with ascites, of whom 557 developed SBP. The pooled results showed that there was no difference in NLR levels between hospitalized cirrhotic patients who developed infection compared to those who did not (random-effects model: SMD = 0.63, 95% CI = -0.01-1.27, p=0.054). However, cirrhotic patients with ascites who developed SBP had elevated levels of NLR compared to those who did not (random-effects model: SMD = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.52-1.57,p < 0.001). This difference remained significant in prospective studies (SMD = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.51-1.38,p < 0.001) but not in retrospective studies (SMD = 1.37, 95% CI = -0.56-3.29,p=0.165), in the subgroup analysis according to the study design. The pooled sensitivity of NLR was 92.07% (95% CI = 74.85%-97.84%) and the pooled specificity was 72.58% (95% CI = 57.72%-83.69%). The pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, DOR of NLR were 3.35(95%CI = 2.06-5.46), 0.10 (95%CI = 0.03-0.38), and 30.78 (95%CI = 7.01-135.04), respectively.

Conclusion: Our results support NLR to be a valid biomarker that can be readily integrated into clinical settings to help in the prevention and prediction of SBP among cirrhotic patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of gastroenterology and liver disease - medicine and surgery. The Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is sponsored by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信