经过全面的标准化和校准培训计划后,手工牙周探诊的可重复性。

Bryan P Fitzgerald, Charles E Hawley, Charles Q Harrold, J Steven Garrett, Alan M Polson, Thomas E Rams
{"title":"经过全面的标准化和校准培训计划后,手工牙周探诊的可重复性。","authors":"Bryan P Fitzgerald, Charles E Hawley, Charles Q Harrold, J Steven Garrett, Alan M Polson, Thomas E Rams","doi":"10.13188/2377-987X.1000063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical standardization and calibration training is recommended to increase the reproducibility of periodontal probing, but its impact on manual periodontal probing outcomes has received little attention. This study examined the reproducibility of manual periodontal probing performed by a periodontist after completion of a comprehensive standardization and calibration training program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A newly-educated periodontist was subjected to an individualized periodontal probing standardization and calibration training program involving approximately 24 total hours of lecture, bench-top, and clinical instruction/evaluation. Satisfactory completion of each portion of the training program required ≥ 95% intra-examiner agreement within 1 mm between initial and repeat measurements, and a ≥ 90% level of exact agreement with measurements by a \"gold standard\" examiner. The periodontist then evaluated bleeding on probing (BOP) and performed duplicate measurements of probing depth (PD) and the distance between the cementoenamel junction and gingival margin (CEJ-GM) with a manual periodontal probe on 567 periodontal sites exhibiting ≥ 5 mm PD with BOP in 39 adults. Clinical periodontal attachment level (CAL) was calculated for each site as (PD) - (CEJ-GM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra-examiner measurement error (the standard deviation for a single measurement) was found to be 0.21 mm for PD, 0.15 mm for CEJ-GM, and 0.26 mm for CAL. Replicate assessments of PD and CAL yielded excellent exact agreement kappa scores of 0.86 and 0.87, respectively. Greater intra-examiner measurement error was found at periodontal sites with more gingival inflammation as measured by higher BOP index scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate that a rigorous periodontal probing standardization and calibration training program facilitates acquisition of highly reproducible PD and CAL assessments in moderate to deep inflamed periodontal pockets with a manual periodontal probe. Similar formal hands-on training should be incorporated into dental education programs and clinical research studies to improve the diagnostic performance of manual periodontal probing of the periodontium.</p>","PeriodicalId":91029,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral biology (Northborough, Mass.)","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducibility of Manual Periodontal Probing Following a Comprehensive Standardization and Calibration Training Program.\",\"authors\":\"Bryan P Fitzgerald, Charles E Hawley, Charles Q Harrold, J Steven Garrett, Alan M Polson, Thomas E Rams\",\"doi\":\"10.13188/2377-987X.1000063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical standardization and calibration training is recommended to increase the reproducibility of periodontal probing, but its impact on manual periodontal probing outcomes has received little attention. This study examined the reproducibility of manual periodontal probing performed by a periodontist after completion of a comprehensive standardization and calibration training program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A newly-educated periodontist was subjected to an individualized periodontal probing standardization and calibration training program involving approximately 24 total hours of lecture, bench-top, and clinical instruction/evaluation. Satisfactory completion of each portion of the training program required ≥ 95% intra-examiner agreement within 1 mm between initial and repeat measurements, and a ≥ 90% level of exact agreement with measurements by a \\\"gold standard\\\" examiner. The periodontist then evaluated bleeding on probing (BOP) and performed duplicate measurements of probing depth (PD) and the distance between the cementoenamel junction and gingival margin (CEJ-GM) with a manual periodontal probe on 567 periodontal sites exhibiting ≥ 5 mm PD with BOP in 39 adults. Clinical periodontal attachment level (CAL) was calculated for each site as (PD) - (CEJ-GM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra-examiner measurement error (the standard deviation for a single measurement) was found to be 0.21 mm for PD, 0.15 mm for CEJ-GM, and 0.26 mm for CAL. Replicate assessments of PD and CAL yielded excellent exact agreement kappa scores of 0.86 and 0.87, respectively. Greater intra-examiner measurement error was found at periodontal sites with more gingival inflammation as measured by higher BOP index scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate that a rigorous periodontal probing standardization and calibration training program facilitates acquisition of highly reproducible PD and CAL assessments in moderate to deep inflamed periodontal pockets with a manual periodontal probe. Similar formal hands-on training should be incorporated into dental education programs and clinical research studies to improve the diagnostic performance of manual periodontal probing of the periodontium.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oral biology (Northborough, Mass.)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552317/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oral biology (Northborough, Mass.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13188/2377-987X.1000063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral biology (Northborough, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13188/2377-987X.1000063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床标准化和校准培训被推荐用于提高牙周探诊的可重复性,但其对人工牙周探诊结果的影响很少受到关注。本研究检查了牙周病医生在完成全面的标准化和校准培训计划后进行的手工牙周探诊的可重复性。方法:对一名刚接受牙周病教育的牙周病专家进行个性化的牙周探诊标准化和校准培训计划,包括大约24小时的讲座、台式教学和临床指导/评估。要圆满完成培训计划的每个部分,在初始测量和重复测量之间的1毫米范围内,审查员之间的一致性≥95%,并且与“金标准”审查员的测量结果的一致性≥90%。然后,牙周病医生评估探诊出血(BOP),并使用手动牙周探针对39名成人的567个牙周部位进行重复测量探诊深度(PD)和牙釉质交界处与牙龈边缘之间的距离(CEJ-GM),这些牙周部位的PD≥5 mm, BOP。临床牙周附着水平(CAL)按(PD) - (CEJ-GM)计算。结果:检查者内部测量误差(单次测量的标准差)发现PD为0.21 mm, CEJ-GM为0.15 mm, CAL为0.26 mm。PD和CAL的重复评估产生了非常精确的一致性kappa评分,分别为0.86和0.87。以较高的BOP指数评分测量,在牙龈炎症较多的牙周部位发现较大的检查人员测量误差。结论:这些研究结果表明,严格的牙周探测标准化和校准培训计划有助于在中度至深度炎症的牙周袋中使用手动牙周探针获得高度可重复性的PD和CAL评估。类似的正式实践培训应纳入牙科教育计划和临床研究,以提高牙周组织的手工牙周探诊的诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reproducibility of Manual Periodontal Probing Following a Comprehensive Standardization and Calibration Training Program.

Reproducibility of Manual Periodontal Probing Following a Comprehensive Standardization and Calibration Training Program.

Reproducibility of Manual Periodontal Probing Following a Comprehensive Standardization and Calibration Training Program.

Background: Clinical standardization and calibration training is recommended to increase the reproducibility of periodontal probing, but its impact on manual periodontal probing outcomes has received little attention. This study examined the reproducibility of manual periodontal probing performed by a periodontist after completion of a comprehensive standardization and calibration training program.

Methods: A newly-educated periodontist was subjected to an individualized periodontal probing standardization and calibration training program involving approximately 24 total hours of lecture, bench-top, and clinical instruction/evaluation. Satisfactory completion of each portion of the training program required ≥ 95% intra-examiner agreement within 1 mm between initial and repeat measurements, and a ≥ 90% level of exact agreement with measurements by a "gold standard" examiner. The periodontist then evaluated bleeding on probing (BOP) and performed duplicate measurements of probing depth (PD) and the distance between the cementoenamel junction and gingival margin (CEJ-GM) with a manual periodontal probe on 567 periodontal sites exhibiting ≥ 5 mm PD with BOP in 39 adults. Clinical periodontal attachment level (CAL) was calculated for each site as (PD) - (CEJ-GM).

Results: Intra-examiner measurement error (the standard deviation for a single measurement) was found to be 0.21 mm for PD, 0.15 mm for CEJ-GM, and 0.26 mm for CAL. Replicate assessments of PD and CAL yielded excellent exact agreement kappa scores of 0.86 and 0.87, respectively. Greater intra-examiner measurement error was found at periodontal sites with more gingival inflammation as measured by higher BOP index scores.

Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that a rigorous periodontal probing standardization and calibration training program facilitates acquisition of highly reproducible PD and CAL assessments in moderate to deep inflamed periodontal pockets with a manual periodontal probe. Similar formal hands-on training should be incorporated into dental education programs and clinical research studies to improve the diagnostic performance of manual periodontal probing of the periodontium.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信