近距离放射治疗辅助手术切除小儿瘢痕疙瘩的初步经验。

Q3 Medicine
S Proaño Landázuri, J Redondo Sedano, E Martí Carrera, L Merino Mateo, A Gómez Sánchez, C Castellano Yáñez, J Pérez-Regadera, A Gómez Fraile, M Delgado Muñoz
{"title":"近距离放射治疗辅助手术切除小儿瘢痕疙瘩的初步经验。","authors":"S Proaño Landázuri,&nbsp;J Redondo Sedano,&nbsp;E Martí Carrera,&nbsp;L Merino Mateo,&nbsp;A Gómez Sánchez,&nbsp;C Castellano Yáñez,&nbsp;J Pérez-Regadera,&nbsp;A Gómez Fraile,&nbsp;M Delgado Muñoz","doi":"10.54847/cp.2022.04.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The treatment of keloid scars is based on multiple lines of therapy, with varying levels of efficacy(1), and there is currently no single treatment that guarantees cure and prevents recurrence. In the pediatric population, the treatments used are not standardized, and there is insufficient evidence to support efficacy and complications. The objective of this study was to analyze the patients who required brachytherapy as an adjuvant to surgical resection in recurrent keloid scars.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with keloids and undergoing adjuvant brachytherapy in our institution was carried out, while assessing efficacy and implementation in our treatment protocol for keloid scarring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After various therapeutic lines, 4 patients aged 9-17 years old with recurrent keloid scars around the ear and eligible for adjuvant brachytherapy - administered after surgical resection, in two sessions - were studied and followed up for up to 18-21 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite our limited experience in the use of adjuvant brachytherapy, the results obtained to date support its efficacy, as reported in the literature. We therefore consider its inclusion in the treatment of keloid scars that have recurred after other treatments to be appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":10316,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica","volume":"35 4","pages":"207-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial experience with brachytherapy treatment adjuvant to surgical resection of keloid scars in the pediatric population.\",\"authors\":\"S Proaño Landázuri,&nbsp;J Redondo Sedano,&nbsp;E Martí Carrera,&nbsp;L Merino Mateo,&nbsp;A Gómez Sánchez,&nbsp;C Castellano Yáñez,&nbsp;J Pérez-Regadera,&nbsp;A Gómez Fraile,&nbsp;M Delgado Muñoz\",\"doi\":\"10.54847/cp.2022.04.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The treatment of keloid scars is based on multiple lines of therapy, with varying levels of efficacy(1), and there is currently no single treatment that guarantees cure and prevents recurrence. In the pediatric population, the treatments used are not standardized, and there is insufficient evidence to support efficacy and complications. The objective of this study was to analyze the patients who required brachytherapy as an adjuvant to surgical resection in recurrent keloid scars.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with keloids and undergoing adjuvant brachytherapy in our institution was carried out, while assessing efficacy and implementation in our treatment protocol for keloid scarring.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After various therapeutic lines, 4 patients aged 9-17 years old with recurrent keloid scars around the ear and eligible for adjuvant brachytherapy - administered after surgical resection, in two sessions - were studied and followed up for up to 18-21 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite our limited experience in the use of adjuvant brachytherapy, the results obtained to date support its efficacy, as reported in the literature. We therefore consider its inclusion in the treatment of keloid scars that have recurred after other treatments to be appropriate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"207-211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54847/cp.2022.04.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54847/cp.2022.04.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:瘢痕疙瘩的治疗是基于多种治疗方法,疗效不同(1),目前还没有一种治疗方法可以保证治愈并防止复发。在儿科人群中,使用的治疗方法没有标准化,没有足够的证据支持疗效和并发症。本研究的目的是分析复发性瘢痕疙瘩需要近距离放疗辅助手术切除的患者。材料与方法:回顾性分析我院诊断为瘢痕疙瘩并接受辅助近距离放疗的患者,同时评估瘢痕疙瘩疤痕治疗方案的疗效和实施情况。结果:经过各种治疗方案,4例年龄9-17岁的复发性耳周瘢痕,符合近距离辅助治疗条件的患者(手术切除后,分两次给予)进行了研究,随访时间长达18-21个月。结论:尽管我们在使用辅助近距离放射治疗方面的经验有限,但根据文献报道,迄今为止获得的结果支持其疗效。因此,我们认为将其纳入其他治疗后复发的瘢痕疙瘩的治疗是适当的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initial experience with brachytherapy treatment adjuvant to surgical resection of keloid scars in the pediatric population.

Objectives: The treatment of keloid scars is based on multiple lines of therapy, with varying levels of efficacy(1), and there is currently no single treatment that guarantees cure and prevents recurrence. In the pediatric population, the treatments used are not standardized, and there is insufficient evidence to support efficacy and complications. The objective of this study was to analyze the patients who required brachytherapy as an adjuvant to surgical resection in recurrent keloid scars.

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with keloids and undergoing adjuvant brachytherapy in our institution was carried out, while assessing efficacy and implementation in our treatment protocol for keloid scarring.

Results: After various therapeutic lines, 4 patients aged 9-17 years old with recurrent keloid scars around the ear and eligible for adjuvant brachytherapy - administered after surgical resection, in two sessions - were studied and followed up for up to 18-21 months.

Conclusions: Despite our limited experience in the use of adjuvant brachytherapy, the results obtained to date support its efficacy, as reported in the literature. We therefore consider its inclusion in the treatment of keloid scars that have recurred after other treatments to be appropriate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信