血流介导的扩张在评估冠心病中的作用:一项荟萃分析。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-09-28 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/7967324
Xiaoyong Xiao, Xian Li, Xiaohua Xiao, Jingjing Wang, Dehong Liu, Zhe Deng
{"title":"血流介导的扩张在评估冠心病中的作用:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Xiaoyong Xiao,&nbsp;Xian Li,&nbsp;Xiaohua Xiao,&nbsp;Jingjing Wang,&nbsp;Dehong Liu,&nbsp;Zhe Deng","doi":"10.1155/2022/7967324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endothelial dysfunction may contribute to the increased morbidity and mortality associated with coronary heart disease (CHD). Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) is the most popular noninvasive method for vascular endothelial function evaluation. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between FMD and CHD. We searched the publications listed in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases. Stata 14 software was used to analyze the data. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to calculate FMD levels, and the effect sizes were expressed with a 95% confidence interval (CI). I<sup>2</sup> statistics were used to evaluate statistical heterogeneity. In this meta-analysis, 9 studies enrolled a total number of 943 participants, including 534 (56.63%) patients with CHD and 409 controls (43.37%). We found that patients with CHD showed a significantly lower FMD than the controls (SMD -0.706%; 95% CI: -0.985, -0.427; <i>P</i>=0.001) with high heterogeneity. In addition, funnel plot analysis suggested asymmetry that could be evidence of publication bias. But sensitivity analyses show that there were no influential studies. This meta-analysis provides evidence that patients with CHD show a significantly lower FMD than controls and highlights the literature on FMD as a hallmark in CHD diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":9494,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"7967324"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9534706/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flow-Mediated Dilatation in the Assessment of Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyong Xiao,&nbsp;Xian Li,&nbsp;Xiaohua Xiao,&nbsp;Jingjing Wang,&nbsp;Dehong Liu,&nbsp;Zhe Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/7967324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Endothelial dysfunction may contribute to the increased morbidity and mortality associated with coronary heart disease (CHD). Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) is the most popular noninvasive method for vascular endothelial function evaluation. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between FMD and CHD. We searched the publications listed in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases. Stata 14 software was used to analyze the data. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to calculate FMD levels, and the effect sizes were expressed with a 95% confidence interval (CI). I<sup>2</sup> statistics were used to evaluate statistical heterogeneity. In this meta-analysis, 9 studies enrolled a total number of 943 participants, including 534 (56.63%) patients with CHD and 409 controls (43.37%). We found that patients with CHD showed a significantly lower FMD than the controls (SMD -0.706%; 95% CI: -0.985, -0.427; <i>P</i>=0.001) with high heterogeneity. In addition, funnel plot analysis suggested asymmetry that could be evidence of publication bias. But sensitivity analyses show that there were no influential studies. This meta-analysis provides evidence that patients with CHD show a significantly lower FMD than controls and highlights the literature on FMD as a hallmark in CHD diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"7967324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9534706/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7967324\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7967324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内皮功能障碍可能与冠心病(CHD)相关的发病率和死亡率增加有关。血流介导扩张(FMD)是血管内皮功能评估中最常用的无创方法。本荟萃分析旨在调查口蹄疫与冠心病之间的关系。我们检索了PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和Embase数据库中列出的出版物。采用Stata 14软件对数据进行分析。采用标准化平均差(SMD)计算口蹄疫水平,效应量用95%置信区间(CI)表示。采用I2统计量评价统计异质性。在本荟萃分析中,9项研究共纳入943名参与者,其中534名(56.63%)冠心病患者和409名对照组(43.37%)。我们发现冠心病患者的FMD明显低于对照组(SMD -0.706%;95% ci: -0.985, -0.427;P=0.001),异质性高。此外,漏斗图分析表明,不对称可能是发表偏倚的证据。但敏感性分析表明,没有有影响力的研究。这项荟萃分析提供了证据,表明冠心病患者的FMD明显低于对照组,并强调了FMD作为冠心病疾病标志的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Flow-Mediated Dilatation in the Assessment of Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Flow-Mediated Dilatation in the Assessment of Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Flow-Mediated Dilatation in the Assessment of Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Flow-Mediated Dilatation in the Assessment of Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Endothelial dysfunction may contribute to the increased morbidity and mortality associated with coronary heart disease (CHD). Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) is the most popular noninvasive method for vascular endothelial function evaluation. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between FMD and CHD. We searched the publications listed in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases. Stata 14 software was used to analyze the data. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to calculate FMD levels, and the effect sizes were expressed with a 95% confidence interval (CI). I2 statistics were used to evaluate statistical heterogeneity. In this meta-analysis, 9 studies enrolled a total number of 943 participants, including 534 (56.63%) patients with CHD and 409 controls (43.37%). We found that patients with CHD showed a significantly lower FMD than the controls (SMD -0.706%; 95% CI: -0.985, -0.427; P=0.001) with high heterogeneity. In addition, funnel plot analysis suggested asymmetry that could be evidence of publication bias. But sensitivity analyses show that there were no influential studies. This meta-analysis provides evidence that patients with CHD show a significantly lower FMD than controls and highlights the literature on FMD as a hallmark in CHD diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology Research and Practice
Cardiology Research and Practice Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies that focus on the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The journal welcomes submissions related to systemic hypertension, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信