Heekyoung Jeong, Kyungdo Han, Soon Jib Yoo, Mee Kyoung Kim
{"title":"年轻人低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平、他汀类药物使用和心肌梗死风险","authors":"Heekyoung Jeong, Kyungdo Han, Soon Jib Yoo, Mee Kyoung Kim","doi":"10.12997/jla.2022.11.3.288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The consequences of blood lipid abnormalities for cardiovascular disease risk in young adults is unclear. Optimal lipid levels may also vary depending on whether a statin drug is taken. It aimed to determine whether the optimal lipid levels in young adults differ depending on statin use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a nationally representative database from the Korean National Health Insurance System, 6,350,400 participants aged 20-39 years who underwent a health examination between 2009-2012 were followed through to 2018. The primary outcome was incident myocardial infarction (MI). We assessed the associations between prespecified lipid levels and MI risk according to statin use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among participants not taking statins, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥120 mg/dL were significantly associated with MI risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-1.40) compared with statin nonusers with LDL-C <80 mg/dL. Statin users with LDL-C categories <80, 80-100, 100-120, and ≥120 mg/dL all had significantly higher MI risk compared with statin nonusers with LDL-C <80 mg/dL; these HRs (95% CIs) were 1.66 (1.39-1.99), 1.68 (1.36-2.09), 1.63 (1.31-2.02), and 2.32 (2.07-2.60), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Young adults taking statins have an increased MI risk compared with statin nonusers, even when they have similar LDL-C levels. Specific lipid targets may need to differ depending on statin use.</p>","PeriodicalId":16284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis","volume":"11 3","pages":"288-298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e9/fe/jla-11-288.PMC9515733.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level, Statin Use and Myocardial Infarction Risk in Young Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Heekyoung Jeong, Kyungdo Han, Soon Jib Yoo, Mee Kyoung Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.12997/jla.2022.11.3.288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The consequences of blood lipid abnormalities for cardiovascular disease risk in young adults is unclear. Optimal lipid levels may also vary depending on whether a statin drug is taken. It aimed to determine whether the optimal lipid levels in young adults differ depending on statin use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a nationally representative database from the Korean National Health Insurance System, 6,350,400 participants aged 20-39 years who underwent a health examination between 2009-2012 were followed through to 2018. The primary outcome was incident myocardial infarction (MI). We assessed the associations between prespecified lipid levels and MI risk according to statin use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among participants not taking statins, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥120 mg/dL were significantly associated with MI risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-1.40) compared with statin nonusers with LDL-C <80 mg/dL. Statin users with LDL-C categories <80, 80-100, 100-120, and ≥120 mg/dL all had significantly higher MI risk compared with statin nonusers with LDL-C <80 mg/dL; these HRs (95% CIs) were 1.66 (1.39-1.99), 1.68 (1.36-2.09), 1.63 (1.31-2.02), and 2.32 (2.07-2.60), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Young adults taking statins have an increased MI risk compared with statin nonusers, even when they have similar LDL-C levels. Specific lipid targets may need to differ depending on statin use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"288-298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e9/fe/jla-11-288.PMC9515733.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12997/jla.2022.11.3.288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12997/jla.2022.11.3.288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level, Statin Use and Myocardial Infarction Risk in Young Adults.
Objective: The consequences of blood lipid abnormalities for cardiovascular disease risk in young adults is unclear. Optimal lipid levels may also vary depending on whether a statin drug is taken. It aimed to determine whether the optimal lipid levels in young adults differ depending on statin use.
Methods: Using a nationally representative database from the Korean National Health Insurance System, 6,350,400 participants aged 20-39 years who underwent a health examination between 2009-2012 were followed through to 2018. The primary outcome was incident myocardial infarction (MI). We assessed the associations between prespecified lipid levels and MI risk according to statin use.
Results: Among participants not taking statins, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥120 mg/dL were significantly associated with MI risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-1.40) compared with statin nonusers with LDL-C <80 mg/dL. Statin users with LDL-C categories <80, 80-100, 100-120, and ≥120 mg/dL all had significantly higher MI risk compared with statin nonusers with LDL-C <80 mg/dL; these HRs (95% CIs) were 1.66 (1.39-1.99), 1.68 (1.36-2.09), 1.63 (1.31-2.02), and 2.32 (2.07-2.60), respectively.
Conclusion: Young adults taking statins have an increased MI risk compared with statin nonusers, even when they have similar LDL-C levels. Specific lipid targets may need to differ depending on statin use.