治疗慢性腰痛的循证干预:个体化治疗方法的治疗选择。

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Pain Reports Pub Date : 2022-09-30 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001019
Matthew C Mauck, Aileen F Aylward, Chloe E Barton, Brandon Birckhead, Timothy Carey, Diane M Dalton, Aaron J Fields, Julie Fritz, Afton L Hassett, Anna Hoffmeyer, Sara B Jones, Samuel A McLean, Wolf E Mehling, Conor W O'Neill, Michael J Schneider, David A Williams, Patricia Zheng, Ajay D Wasan
{"title":"治疗慢性腰痛的循证干预:个体化治疗方法的治疗选择。","authors":"Matthew C Mauck,&nbsp;Aileen F Aylward,&nbsp;Chloe E Barton,&nbsp;Brandon Birckhead,&nbsp;Timothy Carey,&nbsp;Diane M Dalton,&nbsp;Aaron J Fields,&nbsp;Julie Fritz,&nbsp;Afton L Hassett,&nbsp;Anna Hoffmeyer,&nbsp;Sara B Jones,&nbsp;Samuel A McLean,&nbsp;Wolf E Mehling,&nbsp;Conor W O'Neill,&nbsp;Michael J Schneider,&nbsp;David A Williams,&nbsp;Patricia Zheng,&nbsp;Ajay D Wasan","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is highly prevalent in the United States and globally, resulting in functional impairment and lowered quality of life. While many treatments are available for cLBP, clinicians have little information about which specific treatment(s) will work best for individual patients or subgroups of patients. The Back Pain Research Consortium, part of the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-term<sup>SM</sup> (HEAL) Initiative, will conduct a collaborative clinical trial, which seeks to develop a personalized medicine algorithm to optimize patient and provider treatment selection for patients with cLBP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this article is to provide an update on evidence-based cLBP interventions and describe the process of reviewing and selecting interventions for inclusion in the clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A working group of cLBP experts reviewed and selected interventions for inclusion in the clinical trial. The primary evaluation measures were strength of evidence and magnitude of treatment effect. When available in the literature, duration of effect, onset time, carryover effect, multimodal efficacy, responder subgroups, and evidence for the mechanism of treatment effect or biomarkers were considered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The working group selected 4 leading, evidence-based treatments for cLBP to be tested in the clinical trial and for use in routine clinical treatment. These treatments include (1) duloxetine, (2) acceptance and commitment therapy, (3) a classification-based exercise and manual therapy intervention, and (4) a self-management approach. These interventions each had a moderate to high level of evidence to support a therapeutic effect and were from different therapeutic classes.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":" ","pages":"e1019"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/44/af/painreports-7-e1019.PMC9529058.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence-based interventions to treat chronic low back pain: treatment selection for a personalized medicine approach.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew C Mauck,&nbsp;Aileen F Aylward,&nbsp;Chloe E Barton,&nbsp;Brandon Birckhead,&nbsp;Timothy Carey,&nbsp;Diane M Dalton,&nbsp;Aaron J Fields,&nbsp;Julie Fritz,&nbsp;Afton L Hassett,&nbsp;Anna Hoffmeyer,&nbsp;Sara B Jones,&nbsp;Samuel A McLean,&nbsp;Wolf E Mehling,&nbsp;Conor W O'Neill,&nbsp;Michael J Schneider,&nbsp;David A Williams,&nbsp;Patricia Zheng,&nbsp;Ajay D Wasan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is highly prevalent in the United States and globally, resulting in functional impairment and lowered quality of life. While many treatments are available for cLBP, clinicians have little information about which specific treatment(s) will work best for individual patients or subgroups of patients. The Back Pain Research Consortium, part of the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-term<sup>SM</sup> (HEAL) Initiative, will conduct a collaborative clinical trial, which seeks to develop a personalized medicine algorithm to optimize patient and provider treatment selection for patients with cLBP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this article is to provide an update on evidence-based cLBP interventions and describe the process of reviewing and selecting interventions for inclusion in the clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A working group of cLBP experts reviewed and selected interventions for inclusion in the clinical trial. The primary evaluation measures were strength of evidence and magnitude of treatment effect. When available in the literature, duration of effect, onset time, carryover effect, multimodal efficacy, responder subgroups, and evidence for the mechanism of treatment effect or biomarkers were considered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The working group selected 4 leading, evidence-based treatments for cLBP to be tested in the clinical trial and for use in routine clinical treatment. These treatments include (1) duloxetine, (2) acceptance and commitment therapy, (3) a classification-based exercise and manual therapy intervention, and (4) a self-management approach. These interventions each had a moderate to high level of evidence to support a therapeutic effect and were from different therapeutic classes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1019\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/44/af/painreports-7-e1019.PMC9529058.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

慢性腰痛(cLBP)在美国和全球非常普遍,导致功能障碍和生活质量降低。虽然cLBP有许多治疗方法,但临床医生对哪种特定治疗方法对个体患者或亚组患者最有效知之甚少。作为美国国立卫生研究院帮助结束长期sm成瘾(HEAL)倡议的一部分,背部疼痛研究联盟将进行一项合作临床试验,旨在开发一种个性化的医学算法,以优化cLBP患者和提供者的治疗选择。目的:本文的主要目的是提供基于证据的cLBP干预措施的最新进展,并描述审查和选择纳入临床试验的干预措施的过程。方法:cLBP专家工作组审查并选择干预措施纳入临床试验。主要评价指标为证据强度和治疗效果大小。在文献中,考虑了作用持续时间、发病时间、延续效应、多模式疗效、应答者亚组以及治疗作用机制或生物标志物的证据。结论:工作组选择了4种领先的循证治疗cLBP的方法,在临床试验中进行试验,并用于常规临床治疗。这些治疗包括(1)度洛西汀,(2)接受和承诺治疗,(3)基于分类的练习和手工治疗干预,以及(4)自我管理方法。这些干预措施都有中等到高水平的证据来支持治疗效果,并且来自不同的治疗类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence-based interventions to treat chronic low back pain: treatment selection for a personalized medicine approach.

Introduction: Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is highly prevalent in the United States and globally, resulting in functional impairment and lowered quality of life. While many treatments are available for cLBP, clinicians have little information about which specific treatment(s) will work best for individual patients or subgroups of patients. The Back Pain Research Consortium, part of the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-termSM (HEAL) Initiative, will conduct a collaborative clinical trial, which seeks to develop a personalized medicine algorithm to optimize patient and provider treatment selection for patients with cLBP.

Objective: The primary objective of this article is to provide an update on evidence-based cLBP interventions and describe the process of reviewing and selecting interventions for inclusion in the clinical trial.

Methods: A working group of cLBP experts reviewed and selected interventions for inclusion in the clinical trial. The primary evaluation measures were strength of evidence and magnitude of treatment effect. When available in the literature, duration of effect, onset time, carryover effect, multimodal efficacy, responder subgroups, and evidence for the mechanism of treatment effect or biomarkers were considered.

Conclusion: The working group selected 4 leading, evidence-based treatments for cLBP to be tested in the clinical trial and for use in routine clinical treatment. These treatments include (1) duloxetine, (2) acceptance and commitment therapy, (3) a classification-based exercise and manual therapy intervention, and (4) a self-management approach. These interventions each had a moderate to high level of evidence to support a therapeutic effect and were from different therapeutic classes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信