基于性别差异和支持向量机算法的外周血阿尔茨海默病诊断生物标志物的生物信息学分析。

IF 2.7 3区 生物学
Wencan Ji, Ke An, Canjun Wang, Shaohua Wang
{"title":"基于性别差异和支持向量机算法的外周血阿尔茨海默病诊断生物标志物的生物信息学分析。","authors":"Wencan Ji,&nbsp;Ke An,&nbsp;Canjun Wang,&nbsp;Shaohua Wang","doi":"10.1186/s41065-022-00252-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) varies based on gender. Due to the lack of early stage biomarkers, most of them are diagnosed at the terminal stage. This study aimed to explore sex-specific signaling pathways and identify diagnostic biomarkers of AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Microarray dataset for blood was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database of GSE63060 to conduct differentially expressed genes (DEGs) analysis by R software limma. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis and Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were conducted. Immune checkpoint gene expression was compared between females and males. Using CytoHubba, we identified hub genes in a protein-protein interaction network (PPI). Then, we evaluated their distinct effectiveness using unsupervised hierarchical clustering. Support vector machine (SVM) and ten-fold cross-validation were used to further verify these biomarkers. Lastly, we confirmed our findings by using another independent dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 37 female-specific DEGs and 27 male-specific DEGs were identified from GSE63060 datasets. Analyses of enrichment showed that female-specific DEGs primarily focused on energy metabolism, while male-specific DEGs mostly involved in immune regulation. Three immune-checkpoint-relevant genes dysregulated in males. In females, however, these eight genes were not differentially expressed. SNRPG, RPS27A, COX7A2, ATP5PO, LSM3, COX7C, PFDN5, HINT1, PSMA6, RPS3A and RPL31 were regarded as hub genes for females, while SNRPG, RPL31, COX7C, RPS27A, RPL35A, RPS3A, RPS20 and PFDN5 were regarded as hub genes for males. Thirteen hub genes mentioned above was significantly lower in both AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The diagnostic model of 15-marker panel (13 hub genes with sex and age) was developed. Both the training dataset and the independent validation dataset have area under the curve (AUC) with a high value (0.919, 95%CI 0.901-0.929 and 0.803, 95%CI 0.789-0.826). Based on GSEA for hub genes, they were associated with some aspects of AD pathogenesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DEGs in males and females contribute differently to AD pathogenesis. Algorithms combining blood-based biomarkers may improve AD diagnostic accuracy, but large validation studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12862,"journal":{"name":"Hereditas","volume":" ","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531459/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioinformatics analysis of diagnostic biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in peripheral blood based on sex differences and support vector machine algorithm.\",\"authors\":\"Wencan Ji,&nbsp;Ke An,&nbsp;Canjun Wang,&nbsp;Shaohua Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41065-022-00252-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) varies based on gender. Due to the lack of early stage biomarkers, most of them are diagnosed at the terminal stage. This study aimed to explore sex-specific signaling pathways and identify diagnostic biomarkers of AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Microarray dataset for blood was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database of GSE63060 to conduct differentially expressed genes (DEGs) analysis by R software limma. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis and Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were conducted. Immune checkpoint gene expression was compared between females and males. Using CytoHubba, we identified hub genes in a protein-protein interaction network (PPI). Then, we evaluated their distinct effectiveness using unsupervised hierarchical clustering. Support vector machine (SVM) and ten-fold cross-validation were used to further verify these biomarkers. Lastly, we confirmed our findings by using another independent dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 37 female-specific DEGs and 27 male-specific DEGs were identified from GSE63060 datasets. Analyses of enrichment showed that female-specific DEGs primarily focused on energy metabolism, while male-specific DEGs mostly involved in immune regulation. Three immune-checkpoint-relevant genes dysregulated in males. In females, however, these eight genes were not differentially expressed. SNRPG, RPS27A, COX7A2, ATP5PO, LSM3, COX7C, PFDN5, HINT1, PSMA6, RPS3A and RPL31 were regarded as hub genes for females, while SNRPG, RPL31, COX7C, RPS27A, RPL35A, RPS3A, RPS20 and PFDN5 were regarded as hub genes for males. Thirteen hub genes mentioned above was significantly lower in both AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The diagnostic model of 15-marker panel (13 hub genes with sex and age) was developed. Both the training dataset and the independent validation dataset have area under the curve (AUC) with a high value (0.919, 95%CI 0.901-0.929 and 0.803, 95%CI 0.789-0.826). Based on GSEA for hub genes, they were associated with some aspects of AD pathogenesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DEGs in males and females contribute differently to AD pathogenesis. Algorithms combining blood-based biomarkers may improve AD diagnostic accuracy, but large validation studies are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hereditas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531459/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hereditas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41065-022-00252-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hereditas","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41065-022-00252-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:阿尔茨海默病(AD)的患病率因性别而异。由于缺乏早期生物标志物,大多数患者在晚期才被诊断出来。本研究旨在探索性别特异性信号通路并确定AD的诊断生物标志物。方法:从GSE63060基因表达综合数据库(Gene Expression Omnibus, GEO)获取血液微阵列数据集,采用R软件limma进行差异表达基因(differential Expression genes, DEGs)分析。进行基因本体(GO)分析、京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)通路分析和基因集富集分析(GSEA)。比较免疫检查点基因在女性和男性之间的表达。利用CytoHubba,我们确定了蛋白相互作用网络(PPI)中的枢纽基因。然后,我们使用无监督分层聚类来评估它们的不同有效性。使用支持向量机(SVM)和十倍交叉验证进一步验证这些生物标志物。最后,我们通过使用另一个独立的数据集证实了我们的发现。结果:从GSE63060数据集中共鉴定出37个女性特异性deg和27个男性特异性deg。富集分析表明,女性特异性deg主要参与能量代谢,而男性特异性deg主要参与免疫调节。三个免疫检查点相关基因在男性中失调。然而,在雌性中,这8个基因没有差异表达。将SNRPG、RPS27A、COX7A2、ATP5PO、LSM3、COX7C、PFDN5、HINT1、PSMA6、RPS3A和RPL31作为女性的枢纽基因,将SNRPG、RPL31、COX7C、RPS27A、RPL35A、RPS3A、RPS20和PFDN5作为男性的枢纽基因。上述13个中枢基因在AD和轻度认知障碍(MCI)中均显著降低。建立了15标记面板(13个有性别和年龄的枢纽基因)诊断模型。训练数据集和独立验证数据集都有较高的曲线下面积(AUC) (0.919, 95%CI 0.901-0.929和0.803,95%CI 0.789-0.826)。基于枢纽基因的GSEA,它们与AD发病的某些方面有关。结论:男性和女性deg在AD发病中的作用不同。结合基于血液的生物标志物的算法可能提高阿尔茨海默病的诊断准确性,但需要大量的验证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bioinformatics analysis of diagnostic biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in peripheral blood based on sex differences and support vector machine algorithm.

Bioinformatics analysis of diagnostic biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in peripheral blood based on sex differences and support vector machine algorithm.

Bioinformatics analysis of diagnostic biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in peripheral blood based on sex differences and support vector machine algorithm.

Bioinformatics analysis of diagnostic biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in peripheral blood based on sex differences and support vector machine algorithm.

Background: The prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) varies based on gender. Due to the lack of early stage biomarkers, most of them are diagnosed at the terminal stage. This study aimed to explore sex-specific signaling pathways and identify diagnostic biomarkers of AD.

Methods: Microarray dataset for blood was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database of GSE63060 to conduct differentially expressed genes (DEGs) analysis by R software limma. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis and Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were conducted. Immune checkpoint gene expression was compared between females and males. Using CytoHubba, we identified hub genes in a protein-protein interaction network (PPI). Then, we evaluated their distinct effectiveness using unsupervised hierarchical clustering. Support vector machine (SVM) and ten-fold cross-validation were used to further verify these biomarkers. Lastly, we confirmed our findings by using another independent dataset.

Results: A total of 37 female-specific DEGs and 27 male-specific DEGs were identified from GSE63060 datasets. Analyses of enrichment showed that female-specific DEGs primarily focused on energy metabolism, while male-specific DEGs mostly involved in immune regulation. Three immune-checkpoint-relevant genes dysregulated in males. In females, however, these eight genes were not differentially expressed. SNRPG, RPS27A, COX7A2, ATP5PO, LSM3, COX7C, PFDN5, HINT1, PSMA6, RPS3A and RPL31 were regarded as hub genes for females, while SNRPG, RPL31, COX7C, RPS27A, RPL35A, RPS3A, RPS20 and PFDN5 were regarded as hub genes for males. Thirteen hub genes mentioned above was significantly lower in both AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The diagnostic model of 15-marker panel (13 hub genes with sex and age) was developed. Both the training dataset and the independent validation dataset have area under the curve (AUC) with a high value (0.919, 95%CI 0.901-0.929 and 0.803, 95%CI 0.789-0.826). Based on GSEA for hub genes, they were associated with some aspects of AD pathogenesis.

Conclusion: DEGs in males and females contribute differently to AD pathogenesis. Algorithms combining blood-based biomarkers may improve AD diagnostic accuracy, but large validation studies are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hereditas
Hereditas Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For almost a century, Hereditas has published original cutting-edge research and reviews. As the Official journal of the Mendelian Society of Lund, the journal welcomes research from across all areas of genetics and genomics. Topics of interest include human and medical genetics, animal and plant genetics, microbial genetics, agriculture and bioinformatics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信