Ashley M Florence, Joshua Fogel, Makayla Mozey, Shachi Dave, Heidi O'Dell, Mary Fatehi
{"title":"为有宫颈发育不良风险的患者接种治疗性人类乳头瘤病毒疫苗。","authors":"Ashley M Florence, Joshua Fogel, Makayla Mozey, Shachi Dave, Heidi O'Dell, Mary Fatehi","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.22.05141-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shared decision making between patients and their healthcare providers is recommended for use of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil 9 (9v-HPV) in women ages 27-45 years. We studied HPV vaccination as a treatment modality for patients undergoing colposcopy older than age 26 years who tested positive for high-risk subtypes of HPV (HR-HPV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study (N.=155) was performed for patients that were evaluated for cervical dysplasia who tested positive for HR-HPV and received the 9v-HPV vaccine prior to repeat cervical cancer screening with co-testing. Demographic information, risk factors for cervical dysplasia, and treatment outcomes were assessed for response to vaccination as treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeat co-testing was negative for HR-HPV in 76 patients (49%) and was positive in 79 patients (51%). A greater percentage of Hispanic patients cleared the virus and Black patients had a greater percentage of persistent HR-HPV on repeat co-testing (P=0.047). When comparing those who cleared the virus and those who had persistent HR-HPV, there were no differences observed for associated risk factors for dysplasia, HPV subtype, cytology or colposcopy results, vaccine dosing interval, or total number of vaccine doses received.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the HPV vaccine is effective for prevention of infection by high-risk strains of HPV, it remains unclear whether 9v-HPV vaccine should be recommended as a treatment option in exposed patients beyond age 26. We recommend healthcare providers discuss usefulness of 9v-HPV vaccine with their unvaccinated patients 27 years and older at risk for cervical dysplasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic human papilloma virus vaccination in patients at risk for cervical dysplasia.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley M Florence, Joshua Fogel, Makayla Mozey, Shachi Dave, Heidi O'Dell, Mary Fatehi\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-606X.22.05141-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shared decision making between patients and their healthcare providers is recommended for use of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil 9 (9v-HPV) in women ages 27-45 years. We studied HPV vaccination as a treatment modality for patients undergoing colposcopy older than age 26 years who tested positive for high-risk subtypes of HPV (HR-HPV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study (N.=155) was performed for patients that were evaluated for cervical dysplasia who tested positive for HR-HPV and received the 9v-HPV vaccine prior to repeat cervical cancer screening with co-testing. Demographic information, risk factors for cervical dysplasia, and treatment outcomes were assessed for response to vaccination as treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeat co-testing was negative for HR-HPV in 76 patients (49%) and was positive in 79 patients (51%). A greater percentage of Hispanic patients cleared the virus and Black patients had a greater percentage of persistent HR-HPV on repeat co-testing (P=0.047). When comparing those who cleared the virus and those who had persistent HR-HPV, there were no differences observed for associated risk factors for dysplasia, HPV subtype, cytology or colposcopy results, vaccine dosing interval, or total number of vaccine doses received.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the HPV vaccine is effective for prevention of infection by high-risk strains of HPV, it remains unclear whether 9v-HPV vaccine should be recommended as a treatment option in exposed patients beyond age 26. We recommend healthcare providers discuss usefulness of 9v-HPV vaccine with their unvaccinated patients 27 years and older at risk for cervical dysplasia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.22.05141-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.22.05141-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Therapeutic human papilloma virus vaccination in patients at risk for cervical dysplasia.
Background: Shared decision making between patients and their healthcare providers is recommended for use of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil 9 (9v-HPV) in women ages 27-45 years. We studied HPV vaccination as a treatment modality for patients undergoing colposcopy older than age 26 years who tested positive for high-risk subtypes of HPV (HR-HPV).
Methods: A retrospective study (N.=155) was performed for patients that were evaluated for cervical dysplasia who tested positive for HR-HPV and received the 9v-HPV vaccine prior to repeat cervical cancer screening with co-testing. Demographic information, risk factors for cervical dysplasia, and treatment outcomes were assessed for response to vaccination as treatment.
Results: Repeat co-testing was negative for HR-HPV in 76 patients (49%) and was positive in 79 patients (51%). A greater percentage of Hispanic patients cleared the virus and Black patients had a greater percentage of persistent HR-HPV on repeat co-testing (P=0.047). When comparing those who cleared the virus and those who had persistent HR-HPV, there were no differences observed for associated risk factors for dysplasia, HPV subtype, cytology or colposcopy results, vaccine dosing interval, or total number of vaccine doses received.
Conclusions: While the HPV vaccine is effective for prevention of infection by high-risk strains of HPV, it remains unclear whether 9v-HPV vaccine should be recommended as a treatment option in exposed patients beyond age 26. We recommend healthcare providers discuss usefulness of 9v-HPV vaccine with their unvaccinated patients 27 years and older at risk for cervical dysplasia.