COVID-19大流行期间的经验:对生物安全专业人员的调查。

David Gillum, Henry Wyneken, Jennifer Fletcher, Karl Nubbe, Kathleen M Vogel
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间的经验:对生物安全专业人员的调查。","authors":"David Gillum,&nbsp;Henry Wyneken,&nbsp;Jennifer Fletcher,&nbsp;Karl Nubbe,&nbsp;Kathleen M Vogel","doi":"10.1089/apb.2022.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Biosafety professionals were called to action during the COVID-19 pandemic. They were tasked with prescribing measures to keep workers and the community safe while often not having accurate information at their fingertips. Understanding biosafety professionals' experiences may help shape new approaches that could further advance preparedness and resilience goals for future pandemics. This article discusses the overall response efforts of the biosafety community.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The main objective of this article is to quantitatively and qualitatively interrogate the responses to an email survey sent to individuals with biosafety responsibilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. This article catalogues those responses and the different aspects in how biosafety professionals were involved in the pandemic. The focus of this research was on aggregate data and summarized results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 609 out of 654 respondents fully completed the survey, equating to a 93.1% completion rate. Respondents were individuals with varying levels of COVID-19-related responsibilities participating in emergency preparedness and planning, developing laboratory diagnostic capabilities, reviewing clinical trials, developing safety guidelines, writing return-to-work and quarantine procedures, and participating in press releases and communications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biosafety professionals played important roles during the COVID-19 pandemic, from developing safety protocols for laboratories to resourcing personal protective equipment during a global shortage. They experienced challenges when balancing their home/work lives. Some biosafety professionals were very involved in clinical trials and vaccination efforts, but most were not. Overall, there were significant differences in how biosafety professionals were involved in pandemic response efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":520561,"journal":{"name":"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association","volume":" ","pages":"127-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526473/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey of Biosafety Professionals.\",\"authors\":\"David Gillum,&nbsp;Henry Wyneken,&nbsp;Jennifer Fletcher,&nbsp;Karl Nubbe,&nbsp;Kathleen M Vogel\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/apb.2022.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Biosafety professionals were called to action during the COVID-19 pandemic. They were tasked with prescribing measures to keep workers and the community safe while often not having accurate information at their fingertips. Understanding biosafety professionals' experiences may help shape new approaches that could further advance preparedness and resilience goals for future pandemics. This article discusses the overall response efforts of the biosafety community.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The main objective of this article is to quantitatively and qualitatively interrogate the responses to an email survey sent to individuals with biosafety responsibilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. This article catalogues those responses and the different aspects in how biosafety professionals were involved in the pandemic. The focus of this research was on aggregate data and summarized results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 609 out of 654 respondents fully completed the survey, equating to a 93.1% completion rate. Respondents were individuals with varying levels of COVID-19-related responsibilities participating in emergency preparedness and planning, developing laboratory diagnostic capabilities, reviewing clinical trials, developing safety guidelines, writing return-to-work and quarantine procedures, and participating in press releases and communications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biosafety professionals played important roles during the COVID-19 pandemic, from developing safety protocols for laboratories to resourcing personal protective equipment during a global shortage. They experienced challenges when balancing their home/work lives. Some biosafety professionals were very involved in clinical trials and vaccination efforts, but most were not. Overall, there were significant differences in how biosafety professionals were involved in pandemic response efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"127-143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9526473/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/apb.2022.0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/apb.2022.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

导言:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,生物安全专业人员被呼吁采取行动。他们的任务是制定措施,以保证工人和社区的安全,而他们往往没有准确的信息。了解生物安全专业人员的经验可能有助于形成新的方法,从而进一步推进应对未来流行病的准备和复原力目标。本文讨论了生物安全界的总体应对努力。目的:本文的主要目的是定量和定性地询问对2019冠状病毒病大流行期间发送给负责生物安全的个人的电子邮件调查的回复。本文对这些应对措施以及生物安全专业人员如何参与大流行的不同方面进行了分类。本研究的重点是汇总数据和总结结果。结果:654名受访者中,有609人完全完成了调查,完成率为93.1%。受访者是承担不同程度与covid -19相关责任的个人,他们参与了应急准备和规划、发展实验室诊断能力、审查临床试验、制定安全指南、编写重返工作和隔离程序,以及参与新闻稿和沟通。结论:生物安全专业人员在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间发挥了重要作用,从制定实验室安全规程到在全球短缺期间为个人防护设备提供资源。他们在平衡家庭和工作生活时遇到了挑战。一些生物安全专业人员积极参与临床试验和疫苗接种工作,但大多数人没有。总体而言,生物安全专业人员参与大流行应对工作的方式存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey of Biosafety Professionals.

Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey of Biosafety Professionals.

Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey of Biosafety Professionals.

Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey of Biosafety Professionals.

Introduction: Biosafety professionals were called to action during the COVID-19 pandemic. They were tasked with prescribing measures to keep workers and the community safe while often not having accurate information at their fingertips. Understanding biosafety professionals' experiences may help shape new approaches that could further advance preparedness and resilience goals for future pandemics. This article discusses the overall response efforts of the biosafety community.

Objectives: The main objective of this article is to quantitatively and qualitatively interrogate the responses to an email survey sent to individuals with biosafety responsibilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. This article catalogues those responses and the different aspects in how biosafety professionals were involved in the pandemic. The focus of this research was on aggregate data and summarized results.

Results: A total of 609 out of 654 respondents fully completed the survey, equating to a 93.1% completion rate. Respondents were individuals with varying levels of COVID-19-related responsibilities participating in emergency preparedness and planning, developing laboratory diagnostic capabilities, reviewing clinical trials, developing safety guidelines, writing return-to-work and quarantine procedures, and participating in press releases and communications.

Conclusions: Biosafety professionals played important roles during the COVID-19 pandemic, from developing safety protocols for laboratories to resourcing personal protective equipment during a global shortage. They experienced challenges when balancing their home/work lives. Some biosafety professionals were very involved in clinical trials and vaccination efforts, but most were not. Overall, there were significant differences in how biosafety professionals were involved in pandemic response efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信