葡萄赤霉素调节蛋白引起的食物依赖性运动引起的过敏反应一例。

IF 4.5
Takae Kobayashi, Naoshi Shimojo, Masashi Nakamura, Kayoko Matsunaga, Joon Nakata, Kazunori Tagami, Keiko Momma, Hiroshi Narita, Yasuto Kondo
{"title":"葡萄赤霉素调节蛋白引起的食物依赖性运动引起的过敏反应一例。","authors":"Takae Kobayashi,&nbsp;Naoshi Shimojo,&nbsp;Masashi Nakamura,&nbsp;Kayoko Matsunaga,&nbsp;Joon Nakata,&nbsp;Kazunori Tagami,&nbsp;Keiko Momma,&nbsp;Hiroshi Narita,&nbsp;Yasuto Kondo","doi":"10.1111/pai.13850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To the Editor, Increasing incidences of anaphylaxis caused by fruits have recently been reported.1 Reports on peaches and apples causing immediate hypersensitive reactions and fooddependent exerciseinduced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) are noted; however, reports on grapes are limited.2,3 While gibberellinregulated protein (GRP) has been identified as an allergen that induces severe allergic reactions in some fruits and is present in grapes,4 its involvement in grape allergy is unknown. Here, we report a case of FDEIA due to grapes with positive results in the skin prick test (SPT) and enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with purified grape GRP, and demonstrated the crossantigenicity of grape and peach GRPs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of FDEIA caused by grape GRP. An 11yearold boy presented with abdominal pain, respiratory distress, and systemic urticaria after eating grapes, followed by playing soccer for 30 min, was brought to our emergency room and admitted after an intramuscular adrenaline injection. He had a history of atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, and peach allergy since the age of 9 years when he developed systemic urticaria after ingesting one raw peach. According to the Japanese Guidelines for Food Allergy, an oral food challenge (OFC) was performed where 600 g of grapes was negative. On another day, the exercise provocation test (treadmill test, the standard Bruce protocol) was negative for intake of 300 g of grapes and exercise for 15 min. On yet another day, the exercise provocation test was conducted again with the combination of 10 mg/kg (0.28 g) acetylsalicylic acid followed by 350 g of grapes 30 min later and 15 min of exercise 30 min after that. Eye redness, pruritus at the tips of the extremities, and a rash over the entire face appeared within 2 min. After 5 min, he had facial edema and developed respiratory distress (Figure S1). Adrenaline was administered intramuscularly in the left vastus lateralis, and his symptoms improved notably. Thus, he was diagnosed with FDEIA secondary to grapes. He was discharged after treatment and counseling, and had no recurrences thereafter. His specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) titers were measured using ImmunoCAP® (Thermo Fisher Diagnostics, Inc.). The sIgE titers were positive for rPru p 7 (4.24 UA/ml), peach (1.5 UA/ml), apple (0.79 UA/ml), cedar (41.2 UA/ml), and cypress (19.2 UA/ml). It was positive for alder (5.55 UA/ml) but negative for rPru p 1, 3, and 4 (<0.10 UA/ml). These results strongly suggested the involvement of GRP, which was proven by introducing purified grape GRP. This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Fujita Health University (approval number: HM21417). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's parents for this study. Detailed information on the materials and methods used is provided in the online supplement. Grape and peach GRPs were purified using monoclonal antibodies obtained against peach GRP.5 On sodium dodecyl sulfate– polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDSPAGE), grape GRP showed a band that was consistent with its expected size (Figure S2A) and was confirmed by mass spectrometric analysis (51.1% sequence coverage) (Figure S2B). The SPT revealed positive reactions of the patient to both purified peach and grape GRPs, and negative reactions to lipid transfer protein (LTP), pathogenesisrelated class 10 (PR10) proteins, and profilin (Table 1). LTP was reported to be the causative antigen","PeriodicalId":520742,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"e13850"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A case of food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis due to grape gibberellin-regulated protein.\",\"authors\":\"Takae Kobayashi,&nbsp;Naoshi Shimojo,&nbsp;Masashi Nakamura,&nbsp;Kayoko Matsunaga,&nbsp;Joon Nakata,&nbsp;Kazunori Tagami,&nbsp;Keiko Momma,&nbsp;Hiroshi Narita,&nbsp;Yasuto Kondo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pai.13850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To the Editor, Increasing incidences of anaphylaxis caused by fruits have recently been reported.1 Reports on peaches and apples causing immediate hypersensitive reactions and fooddependent exerciseinduced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) are noted; however, reports on grapes are limited.2,3 While gibberellinregulated protein (GRP) has been identified as an allergen that induces severe allergic reactions in some fruits and is present in grapes,4 its involvement in grape allergy is unknown. Here, we report a case of FDEIA due to grapes with positive results in the skin prick test (SPT) and enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with purified grape GRP, and demonstrated the crossantigenicity of grape and peach GRPs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of FDEIA caused by grape GRP. An 11yearold boy presented with abdominal pain, respiratory distress, and systemic urticaria after eating grapes, followed by playing soccer for 30 min, was brought to our emergency room and admitted after an intramuscular adrenaline injection. He had a history of atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, and peach allergy since the age of 9 years when he developed systemic urticaria after ingesting one raw peach. According to the Japanese Guidelines for Food Allergy, an oral food challenge (OFC) was performed where 600 g of grapes was negative. On another day, the exercise provocation test (treadmill test, the standard Bruce protocol) was negative for intake of 300 g of grapes and exercise for 15 min. On yet another day, the exercise provocation test was conducted again with the combination of 10 mg/kg (0.28 g) acetylsalicylic acid followed by 350 g of grapes 30 min later and 15 min of exercise 30 min after that. Eye redness, pruritus at the tips of the extremities, and a rash over the entire face appeared within 2 min. After 5 min, he had facial edema and developed respiratory distress (Figure S1). Adrenaline was administered intramuscularly in the left vastus lateralis, and his symptoms improved notably. Thus, he was diagnosed with FDEIA secondary to grapes. He was discharged after treatment and counseling, and had no recurrences thereafter. His specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) titers were measured using ImmunoCAP® (Thermo Fisher Diagnostics, Inc.). The sIgE titers were positive for rPru p 7 (4.24 UA/ml), peach (1.5 UA/ml), apple (0.79 UA/ml), cedar (41.2 UA/ml), and cypress (19.2 UA/ml). It was positive for alder (5.55 UA/ml) but negative for rPru p 1, 3, and 4 (<0.10 UA/ml). These results strongly suggested the involvement of GRP, which was proven by introducing purified grape GRP. This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Fujita Health University (approval number: HM21417). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's parents for this study. Detailed information on the materials and methods used is provided in the online supplement. Grape and peach GRPs were purified using monoclonal antibodies obtained against peach GRP.5 On sodium dodecyl sulfate– polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDSPAGE), grape GRP showed a band that was consistent with its expected size (Figure S2A) and was confirmed by mass spectrometric analysis (51.1% sequence coverage) (Figure S2B). The SPT revealed positive reactions of the patient to both purified peach and grape GRPs, and negative reactions to lipid transfer protein (LTP), pathogenesisrelated class 10 (PR10) proteins, and profilin (Table 1). LTP was reported to be the causative antigen\",\"PeriodicalId\":520742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e13850\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.13850\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.13850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A case of food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis due to grape gibberellin-regulated protein.
To the Editor, Increasing incidences of anaphylaxis caused by fruits have recently been reported.1 Reports on peaches and apples causing immediate hypersensitive reactions and fooddependent exerciseinduced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) are noted; however, reports on grapes are limited.2,3 While gibberellinregulated protein (GRP) has been identified as an allergen that induces severe allergic reactions in some fruits and is present in grapes,4 its involvement in grape allergy is unknown. Here, we report a case of FDEIA due to grapes with positive results in the skin prick test (SPT) and enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with purified grape GRP, and demonstrated the crossantigenicity of grape and peach GRPs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of FDEIA caused by grape GRP. An 11yearold boy presented with abdominal pain, respiratory distress, and systemic urticaria after eating grapes, followed by playing soccer for 30 min, was brought to our emergency room and admitted after an intramuscular adrenaline injection. He had a history of atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, and peach allergy since the age of 9 years when he developed systemic urticaria after ingesting one raw peach. According to the Japanese Guidelines for Food Allergy, an oral food challenge (OFC) was performed where 600 g of grapes was negative. On another day, the exercise provocation test (treadmill test, the standard Bruce protocol) was negative for intake of 300 g of grapes and exercise for 15 min. On yet another day, the exercise provocation test was conducted again with the combination of 10 mg/kg (0.28 g) acetylsalicylic acid followed by 350 g of grapes 30 min later and 15 min of exercise 30 min after that. Eye redness, pruritus at the tips of the extremities, and a rash over the entire face appeared within 2 min. After 5 min, he had facial edema and developed respiratory distress (Figure S1). Adrenaline was administered intramuscularly in the left vastus lateralis, and his symptoms improved notably. Thus, he was diagnosed with FDEIA secondary to grapes. He was discharged after treatment and counseling, and had no recurrences thereafter. His specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) titers were measured using ImmunoCAP® (Thermo Fisher Diagnostics, Inc.). The sIgE titers were positive for rPru p 7 (4.24 UA/ml), peach (1.5 UA/ml), apple (0.79 UA/ml), cedar (41.2 UA/ml), and cypress (19.2 UA/ml). It was positive for alder (5.55 UA/ml) but negative for rPru p 1, 3, and 4 (<0.10 UA/ml). These results strongly suggested the involvement of GRP, which was proven by introducing purified grape GRP. This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Fujita Health University (approval number: HM21417). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's parents for this study. Detailed information on the materials and methods used is provided in the online supplement. Grape and peach GRPs were purified using monoclonal antibodies obtained against peach GRP.5 On sodium dodecyl sulfate– polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDSPAGE), grape GRP showed a band that was consistent with its expected size (Figure S2A) and was confirmed by mass spectrometric analysis (51.1% sequence coverage) (Figure S2B). The SPT revealed positive reactions of the patient to both purified peach and grape GRPs, and negative reactions to lipid transfer protein (LTP), pathogenesisrelated class 10 (PR10) proteins, and profilin (Table 1). LTP was reported to be the causative antigen
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信