知觉不流畅Sans Forgetica字体研究词的识别。

Q2 Medicine
Lucy Cui, Jereth Liu
{"title":"知觉不流畅Sans Forgetica字体研究词的识别。","authors":"Lucy Cui,&nbsp;Jereth Liu","doi":"10.3390/vision6030052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The new Sans Forgetica (SF) typeface creates perceptual disfluency by breaking up parts of letters vertically, horizontally, or diagonally, thereby fragmentizing them. While patterns of fragmentization are consistent for each unique letter, they are not uniform across letters. With Gestalt principles such as good continuation and perceptual completion being more difficult to implement in these settings, viewers may need to depend on context clues to identify words. This may be a desirable difficulty and improve memory for those words. Here, we investigate whether SF improves recognition of studied words. In Experiment 1, participants studied words in Arial and SF and completed old-new recognition tests where words retained their study fonts. In Experiment 2, we investigated the potential for context reinstatement-testing studied words in their studied fonts or the other font. Hit rate and discrimination sensitivities (<i>d'</i>) were analyzed for both experiments. Participants had significantly better recognition (hit rate) in SF than in Arial (Exp 1) and significantly higher discrimination sensitivities (<i>d'</i>) when words were tested in SF than in Arial (Exp 2). However, further examination of these results (e.g., marginally more response bias with SF than with Arial in Exp 1) lead us to hold reservations for the benefit of SF on word memory and conjecture that SF, at best, plays a limited role in improving recognition of studied words.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501108/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font.\",\"authors\":\"Lucy Cui,&nbsp;Jereth Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/vision6030052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The new Sans Forgetica (SF) typeface creates perceptual disfluency by breaking up parts of letters vertically, horizontally, or diagonally, thereby fragmentizing them. While patterns of fragmentization are consistent for each unique letter, they are not uniform across letters. With Gestalt principles such as good continuation and perceptual completion being more difficult to implement in these settings, viewers may need to depend on context clues to identify words. This may be a desirable difficulty and improve memory for those words. Here, we investigate whether SF improves recognition of studied words. In Experiment 1, participants studied words in Arial and SF and completed old-new recognition tests where words retained their study fonts. In Experiment 2, we investigated the potential for context reinstatement-testing studied words in their studied fonts or the other font. Hit rate and discrimination sensitivities (<i>d'</i>) were analyzed for both experiments. Participants had significantly better recognition (hit rate) in SF than in Arial (Exp 1) and significantly higher discrimination sensitivities (<i>d'</i>) when words were tested in SF than in Arial (Exp 2). However, further examination of these results (e.g., marginally more response bias with SF than with Arial in Exp 1) lead us to hold reservations for the benefit of SF on word memory and conjecture that SF, at best, plays a limited role in improving recognition of studied words.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vision (Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9501108/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vision (Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/vision6030052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision (Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vision6030052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

新的Sans Forgetica (SF)字体通过将字母垂直、水平或对角线分开,从而使它们碎片化,从而产生感知上的不流畅性。虽然碎片化的模式对于每个独特的字母是一致的,但它们在字母之间并不统一。由于格式塔原则(如良好的延续和感知完成)在这些设置中更难实现,观众可能需要依赖上下文线索来识别单词。这可能是一个理想的难度,并提高记忆这些单词。在这里,我们研究SF是否提高了对所学习单词的识别。在实验1中,被试学习Arial和SF字体的单词,并在单词保留学习字体的情况下完成新旧识别测试。在实验2中,我们研究了上下文恢复的可能性——测试研究的单词在其研究的字体或其他字体中。分析了两个实验的命中率和识别灵敏度(d')。实验1中,受试者对SF的识别(命中率)明显优于Arial;实验2中,受试者对SF的识别敏感度(d')也明显高于Arial。然而,对这些结果的进一步检验(例如,在实验1中,SF的反应偏差略高于Arial)使我们对SF对单词记忆的好处持保留态度,并推测SF在提高所研究单词的识别方面最多发挥有限的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font.

Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font.

Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font.

Recognition of Studied Words in Perceptual Disfluent Sans Forgetica Font.

The new Sans Forgetica (SF) typeface creates perceptual disfluency by breaking up parts of letters vertically, horizontally, or diagonally, thereby fragmentizing them. While patterns of fragmentization are consistent for each unique letter, they are not uniform across letters. With Gestalt principles such as good continuation and perceptual completion being more difficult to implement in these settings, viewers may need to depend on context clues to identify words. This may be a desirable difficulty and improve memory for those words. Here, we investigate whether SF improves recognition of studied words. In Experiment 1, participants studied words in Arial and SF and completed old-new recognition tests where words retained their study fonts. In Experiment 2, we investigated the potential for context reinstatement-testing studied words in their studied fonts or the other font. Hit rate and discrimination sensitivities (d') were analyzed for both experiments. Participants had significantly better recognition (hit rate) in SF than in Arial (Exp 1) and significantly higher discrimination sensitivities (d') when words were tested in SF than in Arial (Exp 2). However, further examination of these results (e.g., marginally more response bias with SF than with Arial in Exp 1) lead us to hold reservations for the benefit of SF on word memory and conjecture that SF, at best, plays a limited role in improving recognition of studied words.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vision (Switzerland)
Vision (Switzerland) Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信