{"title":"喷砂或磨砂修复的老化堆填复合材料的硅化效果:体外研究。","authors":"Huda Hashim, Manal Hussain Abd-Alla","doi":"10.2147/CCIDE.S381235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure the repair shear bond strength (SBS) of an aged bulk-fill composite after different mechanical (diamond bur vs sandblasting) and chemical (universal adhesive with or without a previous silanization) surface treatments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Bulk-fill composite (Filtek One Bulk Fill, 3M ESPE) was used to construct seventy-two specimens aged through 10,000 thermal cycles. The specimens were allocated into two groups (n = 36 each) according to the mechanical roughening: Db, treated with a diamond bur, and Sb, treated by sandblasting. Each group was further subdivided into three subgroups (n = 12 each) according to the chemical conditioning: Db-only and Sb-only, unconditioned specimens; Db-U and Sb-U, specimens were conditioned with silane-containing universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal adhesive, 3M ESPE); and Db-S-U and Sb-S-U, specimens were conditioned with a silane agent (Prosil, FGM) before employing the universal adhesive. The same composite material was used for repair. An additional reference group was constructed to measure the cohesive strengths of the bulk-fill composite. SBS testing was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min, and the failure modes were evaluated by stereomicroscope. The surface topography of resin composite after roughening was assessed by scanning electron microscopy. SBS data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA, Tukey's test and independent <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The significantly highest SBS was recorded in the reference group (P ≤ 0.05). Sb-only obtained significantly higher SBS than Db-only (P < 0.001). No significant difference in SBS was noted between Db-U and Sb-U or Db-S-U and Sb-S-U. Likewise, no significant difference was observed between the subgroups treated with or without silane (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sandblasted specimens demonstrated a higher repair SBS than the diamond bur-treated specimens. The use of an additional silanizing step before applying silane-containing universal adhesive did not enhance the SBS of the repaired composite.</p>","PeriodicalId":10445,"journal":{"name":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d3/e4/ccide-14-265.PMC9462518.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Silanizing Effectiveness on the Bond Strength of Aged Bulk-Fill Composite Repaired After Sandblasting or Bur Abrasion Treatments: An in vitro Study.\",\"authors\":\"Huda Hashim, Manal Hussain Abd-Alla\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CCIDE.S381235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure the repair shear bond strength (SBS) of an aged bulk-fill composite after different mechanical (diamond bur vs sandblasting) and chemical (universal adhesive with or without a previous silanization) surface treatments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Bulk-fill composite (Filtek One Bulk Fill, 3M ESPE) was used to construct seventy-two specimens aged through 10,000 thermal cycles. The specimens were allocated into two groups (n = 36 each) according to the mechanical roughening: Db, treated with a diamond bur, and Sb, treated by sandblasting. Each group was further subdivided into three subgroups (n = 12 each) according to the chemical conditioning: Db-only and Sb-only, unconditioned specimens; Db-U and Sb-U, specimens were conditioned with silane-containing universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal adhesive, 3M ESPE); and Db-S-U and Sb-S-U, specimens were conditioned with a silane agent (Prosil, FGM) before employing the universal adhesive. The same composite material was used for repair. An additional reference group was constructed to measure the cohesive strengths of the bulk-fill composite. SBS testing was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min, and the failure modes were evaluated by stereomicroscope. The surface topography of resin composite after roughening was assessed by scanning electron microscopy. SBS data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA, Tukey's test and independent <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The significantly highest SBS was recorded in the reference group (P ≤ 0.05). Sb-only obtained significantly higher SBS than Db-only (P < 0.001). No significant difference in SBS was noted between Db-U and Sb-U or Db-S-U and Sb-S-U. Likewise, no significant difference was observed between the subgroups treated with or without silane (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sandblasted specimens demonstrated a higher repair SBS than the diamond bur-treated specimens. The use of an additional silanizing step before applying silane-containing universal adhesive did not enhance the SBS of the repaired composite.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d3/e4/ccide-14-265.PMC9462518.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S381235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S381235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:测定老化体填料复合材料在经过不同机械(喷砂与金刚石)和化学(通用粘接或未进行硅化处理)表面处理后的修复剪切强度(SBS)。材料和方法:使用填充复合材料(Filtek One Bulk Fill, 3M ESPE)构建72个经过10,000次热循环老化的样品。根据机械粗化程度将试样分为两组,每组36个,分别用金刚石钎处理Db和喷砂处理Sb。每组按化学条件再细分为3个亚组(每组n = 12):无化学条件的b组和sb组;Db-U和Sb-U用含硅烷万能胶(Scotchbond万能胶,3M ESPE)处理;以及Db-S-U和Sb-S-U,在使用通用粘合剂之前,用硅烷剂(Prosil, FGM)对样品进行处理。采用相同的复合材料进行修复。另外建立了一个参照组来测量堆填复合材料的内聚强度。采用万能试验机,以1 mm/min的十字速度进行SBS试验,并用体视显微镜评估失效模式。用扫描电镜观察粗化后树脂复合材料的表面形貌。SBS资料采用方差分析、Tukey检验和独立t检验进行统计学分析。结果:参照组的SBS最高(P≤0.05)。单用sb组的SBS明显高于单用db组(P < 0.001)。b- u与Sb-U或b- s - u与Sb-S-U之间的SBS无显著差异。同样,添加或未添加硅烷的亚组间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。结论:喷砂处理的试样比金刚石毛刺处理的试样具有更高的修复SBS。在使用含硅烷万能胶之前使用额外的硅化步骤并没有提高修复复合材料的SBS。
Silanizing Effectiveness on the Bond Strength of Aged Bulk-Fill Composite Repaired After Sandblasting or Bur Abrasion Treatments: An in vitro Study.
Objective: To measure the repair shear bond strength (SBS) of an aged bulk-fill composite after different mechanical (diamond bur vs sandblasting) and chemical (universal adhesive with or without a previous silanization) surface treatments.
Materials and methods: Bulk-fill composite (Filtek One Bulk Fill, 3M ESPE) was used to construct seventy-two specimens aged through 10,000 thermal cycles. The specimens were allocated into two groups (n = 36 each) according to the mechanical roughening: Db, treated with a diamond bur, and Sb, treated by sandblasting. Each group was further subdivided into three subgroups (n = 12 each) according to the chemical conditioning: Db-only and Sb-only, unconditioned specimens; Db-U and Sb-U, specimens were conditioned with silane-containing universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal adhesive, 3M ESPE); and Db-S-U and Sb-S-U, specimens were conditioned with a silane agent (Prosil, FGM) before employing the universal adhesive. The same composite material was used for repair. An additional reference group was constructed to measure the cohesive strengths of the bulk-fill composite. SBS testing was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min, and the failure modes were evaluated by stereomicroscope. The surface topography of resin composite after roughening was assessed by scanning electron microscopy. SBS data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA, Tukey's test and independent t-test.
Results: The significantly highest SBS was recorded in the reference group (P ≤ 0.05). Sb-only obtained significantly higher SBS than Db-only (P < 0.001). No significant difference in SBS was noted between Db-U and Sb-U or Db-S-U and Sb-S-U. Likewise, no significant difference was observed between the subgroups treated with or without silane (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: The sandblasted specimens demonstrated a higher repair SBS than the diamond bur-treated specimens. The use of an additional silanizing step before applying silane-containing universal adhesive did not enhance the SBS of the repaired composite.